• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项支持患者参与初级卫生保健研究的培训计划:协同设计、实施与评估研究

A Training Program to Support Patient Engagement in Primary Health Care Research: Co-Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.

作者信息

Terry Amanda L, Bayliss Lorraine, Meredith Leslie, Law Eugene, Van Hoorn Rob, Regan Sandra

机构信息

Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada, 1 519-661-2111 ext 20049, 1 519-858-5029.

Transdisciplinary Understanding and Training on Research-Primary Health Care (TUTOR-PHC) Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2025 Jun 5;17:e65485. doi: 10.2196/65485.

DOI:10.2196/65485
PMID:40472265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12161618/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement in research represents an evolution in how new knowledge is being created. Individuals and teams seeking to conduct research in this way want to learn how to best approach this aspect. Specialized training is required to ensure that these individuals and groups have the knowledge and skills to engage with and accomplish these goals. We developed a training program, called Patient-Oriented Research Training & Learning - Primary Health Care (PORTL-PHC), to address this need.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper was to describe key learning needs and knowledge gaps regarding patient-oriented research in primary health care, as well as the design, implementation, and evaluation of the PORTL-PHC program.

METHODS

First, we completed a needs assessment to determine the learning needs of the program's target groups (including patient partners, policy makers, health care practitioners, and researchers). Second, building on the results of the needs assessment, the development and implementation of the program followed a series of iterative steps, including user testing of the program's content and format. Third, we conducted an evaluation with two components: (1) program registrants were asked to respond to questions as they progressed through the training content that explored what aspects of the content users found the most useful, suggestions for improvement, and any difficulties navigating the learning platform; and (2) program registrants were administered a questionnaire in three waves (January 2020, July 2020, and September 2021) 6 months after they had completed the program, that asked them to rate their gains in different areas of knowledge and skills regarding patient-oriented research on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

There were 205 learners who participated in the program from January 2018 to January 2022. The target audience was reached with registrants from all groups; the majority of learners were from Canada (194/205, 95%). A total of 6 main areas of knowledge needs were identified from the needs assessment, and the program was iteratively developed and refined to address these needs and our learning objectives. Suggestions for improvement received from the first component of the evaluation were used to enhance and refine the program. Of the 88 learners who had completed the program at the time of the evaluation questionnaire administration, 28 responded to our request to complete an evaluation. The results indicate that PORTL-PHC increased knowledge of patient-oriented PHC research (overall mean score of 4.36, SD .56). Learners gained skills and knowledge in identifying patient priorities in PHC (mean 4.27, SD .63), understanding the methods of patient engagement (mean 4.32, SD .65), and skills for engagement in patient-oriented research (mean 4.41, SD .50). The majority of respondents (23/28, 82%) indicated that they intended to use the information from the PORTL-PHC training program in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the PORTL-PHC program, we are training a new cadre of interested individuals who are committed to patient engagement in research to improve the provision of primary health care, and thus, patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

患者参与研究代表了新知识产生方式的一种演变。寻求以这种方式开展研究的个人和团队希望了解如何最好地处理这一方面。需要专门培训以确保这些个人和团体具备参与并实现这些目标的知识和技能。我们开发了一个名为“以患者为导向的研究培训与学习——初级卫生保健”(PORTL-PHC)的培训项目来满足这一需求。

目的

本文的目的是描述关于初级卫生保健中以患者为导向的研究的关键学习需求和知识差距,以及PORTL-PHC项目的设计、实施和评估。

方法

首先,我们完成了一项需求评估,以确定该项目目标群体(包括患者合作伙伴、政策制定者、医疗保健从业者和研究人员)的学习需求。其次,基于需求评估的结果,该项目的开发和实施遵循了一系列迭代步骤,包括对项目内容和形式进行用户测试。第三,我们进行了一项包含两个部分的评估:(1)要求项目注册者在学习培训内容的过程中回答问题,这些问题探讨了用户认为内容中最有用的方面、改进建议以及在学习平台上遇到的任何困难;(2)在项目注册者完成项目6个月后(2020年1月、2020年7月和2021年9月)分三轮向他们发放问卷,要求他们使用5点李克特量表对在以患者为导向的研究的不同知识和技能领域的收获进行评分。

结果

2018年1月至2022年1月期间有205名学习者参加了该项目。所有群体的注册者都覆盖到了目标受众;大多数学习者来自加拿大(194/205,95%)。从需求评估中总共确定了6个主要知识需求领域,并且该项目经过反复开发和完善以满足这些需求和我们的学习目标。从评估的第一部分收到的改进建议被用于加强和完善该项目。在进行评估问卷调查时已完成项目的88名学习者中,有28人回应了我们完成评估的请求。结果表明,PORTL-PHC增加了对以患者为导向的初级卫生保健研究的了解(总体平均分为4.36,标准差为0.56)。学习者在确定初级卫生保健中的患者优先事项(平均分为4.27,标准差为0.63)、理解患者参与的方法(平均分为4.32,标准差为0.65)以及参与以患者为导向的研究的技能(平均分为4.41,标准差为0.50)方面获得了技能和知识。大多数受访者(23/28,82%)表示他们打算在未来使用PORTL-PHC培训项目中的信息。

结论

通过PORTL-PHC项目,我们正在培训一批新的有兴趣的人员,他们致力于让患者参与研究以改善初级卫生保健的提供,从而改善患者的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a5/12161618/47619bda3cfd/jopm-v17-e65485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a5/12161618/461ebaef7855/jopm-v17-e65485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a5/12161618/47619bda3cfd/jopm-v17-e65485-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a5/12161618/461ebaef7855/jopm-v17-e65485-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a5/12161618/47619bda3cfd/jopm-v17-e65485-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Training Program to Support Patient Engagement in Primary Health Care Research: Co-Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.一项支持患者参与初级卫生保健研究的培训计划:协同设计、实施与评估研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Jun 5;17:e65485. doi: 10.2196/65485.
2
Program Report: KidneyPRO, a Web-based Training Module for Patient Engagement in Kidney Research.项目报告:KidneyPRO,一个用于患者参与肾脏研究的基于网络的培训模块。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Dec 21;7:2054358120979255. doi: 10.1177/2054358120979255. eCollection 2020.
3
Complex skills are required for new primary health care researchers: a training program responds.新的基层医疗研究人员需要掌握复杂的技能:一个培训计划做出了回应。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03620-3.
4
Enhancing patient-oriented research training: participant perceptions of an online course.加强以患者为导向的研究培训:参与者对一门在线课程的看法
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 6;10(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00629-4.
5
Evaluation of the partners in research course: a patient and researcher co-created course to build capacity in patient-oriented research.研究课程中合作伙伴的评估:一门由患者和研究人员共同创建的课程,旨在培养以患者为导向的研究能力。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00316-8.
6
7
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
9
Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.青少年参与研究:探索神经发育障碍青少年的培训需求。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.
10
Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.面向研究人员、患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者的健康领域以患者为导向的研究能力(PORCH):一项范围综述的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 10;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement in Health Research: An Exploratory Study Using Multiple Survey Tools.衡量患者参与健康研究的影响:一项使用多种调查工具的探索性研究。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 2;7(2):177-187. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad045. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers.未来患者参与研究的方向:加拿大患者伙伴和学术研究人员的参与式研讨会。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 14;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01106-w.
3
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation.
系列:公众参与研究。第 4 部分:最大限度地提高公众参与研究实施的好处。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2243037. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2243037.
4
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 1: The fundamentals of public engagement with research.系列:研究的公众参与。第 1 部分:研究的公众参与基础。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2232111. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2232111.
5
Patient Engagement in Health Research: Perspectives from Patient Participants.患者参与健康研究:患者参与者的观点。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 26;30(3):2770-2780. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030210.
6
Patient and public involvement in research: a review of practical resources for young investigators.患者及公众参与研究:青年研究者实用资源综述
BMC Rheumatol. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41927-023-00327-w.
7
Training and capacity development in patient-oriented research: Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit (OSSU) initiatives.以患者为导向的研究中的培训与能力发展:安大略省战略卫生研究基金支持单位(OSSU)的举措。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Feb 25;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00415-8.
8
Our role in making the Canadian health care system one of the world's best: How family medicine and primary care can transform-and bring the rest of the system with us.我们在使加拿大医疗保健系统成为世界最佳之一方面所发挥的作用:家庭医学和初级保健如何实现变革并带动整个系统一同进步。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 Jan;69(1):11-16. doi: 10.46747/cfp.690111.
9
Codevelopment and usability testing of Patient Engagement 101: a Patient-Oriented Research Curriculum in Child Health e-learning module for health care professionals, researchers and trainees.患者参与 101 的共同开发和可用性测试:针对医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和受训者的儿童健康电子学习模块中的以患者为中心的研究课程。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Oct 4;10(4):E872-E881. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210336. Print 2022 Oct-Dec.
10
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences.患者参与加拿大卫生研究院战略导向研究项目资助研究的活动及影响:对学术研究人员和患者合作伙伴经历的横断面调查
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 29;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4.