Jany Nina
Department of Social Work, Social Policy and Global Development, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Soc Justice Res. 2021;34(3):317-341. doi: 10.1007/s11211-021-00372-1. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
This article disentangles and explores some commonly made assumptions about . Based on the conceptual framework of the multiprinciple approach of justice, it presents the results of an in-depth analysis of (e)valuation patterns of distributive justice in Cuban state-socialism. The analysis mainly focuses on ideational conceptions of distributive justice , but it also accounts for distribution outcomes and resulting (in)equalities . The results of the comparative case study of the Cuban framework of institutions and political leaders' views in two periods of time, the early 1960s and the 2010s, point to (e)valuation patterns that are generally labelled as , such as the allocation rules of outcome equality and (non-functional) needs. However, contrary to common assumptions about egalitarian state-socialist ideologies, the results also point to several other patterns including equity rules as well as functional and productivist allocation rules. I argue that many of these (e)valuation patterns, in their connection to the discursive storyline of the Cuban are indeed compatible with
本文梳理并探讨了一些关于……的常见假设。基于正义多原则方法的概念框架，本文呈现了对古巴国家社会主义中分配正义（评估）模式进行深入分析的结果。该分析主要聚焦于分配正义的观念概念，但也考虑了分配结果以及由此产生的（不）平等。对古巴制度框架以及政治领导人在20世纪60年代初和2010年代这两个时期观点的比较案例研究结果，指向了通常被标记为……的评估模式，比如结果平等和（非功能性）需求的分配规则。然而，与关于平等主义国家社会主义意识形态的常见假设相反，结果还指向了其他几种模式，包括公平规则以及功能性和生产主义分配规则。我认为，这些评估模式中的许多，在与古巴……的话语脉络相联系时，确实与……兼容。
