Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168, Roma, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2022 Jan;127(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01421-0. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
Our study investigated the contribution that the application of radiomics analysis on post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging can add to the assessments performed by an experienced disease-specific multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) for the prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
This analysis included consecutively retrospective LARC patients who obtained a complete or near-complete response after nCRT and/or a pCR after surgery between January 2010 and September 2019. A three-step radiomics features selection was performed and three models were generated: a radiomics model (rRM), a multidisciplinary tumor board model (yMTB) and a combined model (CM). The predictive performance of models was quantified using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, evaluating the area under curve (AUC).
The analysis involved 144 LARC patients; a total of 232 radiomics features were extracted from the MR images acquired post-nCRT. The yMTB, rRM and CM predicted pCR with an AUC of 0.82, 0.73 and 0.84, respectively. ROC comparison was not significant (p = 0.6) between yMTB and CM.
Radiomics analysis showed good performance in identifying complete responders, which increased when combined with standard clinical evaluation; this increase was not statistically significant but did improve the prediction of clinical response.
本研究旨在探讨放射组学分析在治疗后磁共振成像中的应用对经验丰富的疾病特异性多学科肿瘤委员会(MTB)评估新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者病理完全缓解(pCR)的预测结果的贡献。
本回顾性分析纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月期间接受 nCRT 后完全或接近完全缓解以及手术后获得 pCR 的连续 LARC 患者。进行了三步放射组学特征选择,并生成了三种模型:放射组学模型(rRM)、多学科肿瘤委员会模型(yMTB)和联合模型(CM)。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估模型的预测性能,通过计算曲线下面积(AUC)来评估 AUC。
本分析共纳入 144 例 LARC 患者,共从 nCRT 后获得的磁共振图像中提取了 232 个放射组学特征。yMTB、rRM 和 CM 预测 pCR 的 AUC 分别为 0.82、0.73 和 0.84。yMTB 和 CM 之间的 ROC 比较无统计学意义(p=0.6)。
放射组学分析在识别完全缓解者方面表现良好,当与标准临床评估相结合时效果更佳;这种改善虽然没有统计学意义,但确实提高了对临床反应的预测。