Du Yaqi, Wang Zhengguang, Wan Weina
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
J Cancer. 2021 Oct 22;12(23):7177-7189. doi: 10.7150/jca.63029. eCollection 2021.
The role of RASGRF2 has been verified in the development of various cancers. However, its roles in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) are still under investigation. RASGRF2 transcript-level data and the associated clinical information from patients with STAD were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Diagnostic and prognostic values of RASGRF2 were analyzed using receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis, correlation analysis, and survival analysis in conjunction with a prognostic model. In addition, gene expression profiles, differentially-expressed genes for co-varying expression, and a differential expressed genes (DEG) protein-protein interaction network for influential nodes were also analyzed. To identify the molecular role of RASGRF2 in STAD, gene ontology (GO) term, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) biological pathway, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)-mediated functional module enrichment analyses were conducted. The relationship between RASGRF2 and gene signature-based predicted immune cell infiltration patterns were also investigated. To validate the bioinformatic findings, RASGRF2 protein expression was investigated using western blot and immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, relationships among RASGRF2 protein expression, clinicopathologic characteristics, and patient survival were analyzed. Bioinformatic analysis revealed a significantly higher RASGRF2 transcript level in STAD tissue, which was positively associated with the T stage, histological type, histological grade, and TP53 status. Moreover, the RASGRF2 transcript level indicated poor overall survival in STAD patients (hazard ratio = 1.47, = 0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that primary therapy outcome, age, and RASGRF2 transcript level were independent prognostic factors for survival, and the C-index of a nomogram was 0.695. Additionally, 159 genes were differentially expressed according to RASGRF2 transcript levels; 15 exhibited co-varying expression, and 13 were identified as influential nodes. The DEG-list was significantly enriched for several GO terms, biological pathways, and functional modules, including MAPK, RAS, ERK, and immunoregulatory pathways. RASGRF2 transcript levels were significantly positively correlated with infiltration levels of Tem, Macrophages, pDCs, and NK cells. Validation analysis showed similar results for the RASGRF2 protein expression level in both analyses. Bioinformatic predictions combined with validation suggest that RASGRF2 plays diagnostic and prognostic roles and serves as a negative protective molecular factor in STAD patients.
RASGRF2的作用已在多种癌症的发展过程中得到验证。然而,其在胃腺癌(STAD)中的作用仍在研究中。从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)中提取了STAD患者的RASGRF2转录水平数据及相关临床信息。结合预后模型,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析、相关性分析和生存分析来分析RASGRF2的诊断和预后价值。此外,还分析了基因表达谱、共变表达的差异表达基因以及有影响节点的差异表达基因(DEG)蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络。为了确定RASGRF2在STAD中的分子作用,进行了基因本体(GO)术语、京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)生物途径以及基因集富集分析(GSEA)介导的功能模块富集分析。还研究了RASGRF2与基于基因特征预测的免疫细胞浸润模式之间的关系。为了验证生物信息学研究结果,使用蛋白质免疫印迹和免疫组织化学研究了RASGRF2蛋白表达。此外,分析了RASGRF2蛋白表达、临床病理特征和患者生存之间的关系。生物信息学分析显示,STAD组织中RASGRF2转录水平显著更高,这与T分期、组织学类型、组织学分级和TP53状态呈正相关。此外,RASGRF2转录水平表明STAD患者的总生存期较差(风险比=1.47,P=0.023)。多因素Cox回归分析表明,初始治疗结果、年龄和RASGRF2转录水平是生存的独立预后因素,列线图的C指数为0.695。此外,根据RASGRF2转录水平有159个基因差异表达;15个表现出共变表达,13个被确定为有影响节点。DEG列表在几个GO术语、生物途径和功能模块中显著富集,包括MAPK、RAS、ERK和免疫调节途径。RASGRF2转录水平与Tem、巨噬细胞、pDC和NK细胞的浸润水平显著正相关。验证分析显示两种分析中RASGRF2蛋白表达水平的结果相似。生物信息学预测与验证相结合表明,RASGRF2在STAD患者中发挥诊断和预后作用,并作为一种负性保护分子因子。