• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国华盛顿州西雅图市实施含糖饮料税后两年的影响。

Impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax two-year post-tax implementation in Seattle, Washington, United States.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Administration (MC 923), School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Rm. 777, 1603 W Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612-4393, USA.

Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 2021 Dec;42(4):574-588. doi: 10.1057/s41271-021-00308-8. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1057/s41271-021-00308-8
PMID:34732842
Abstract

This study examines longer-run impacts of the Seattle, Washington, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT) on beverage prices, volume sold, and cross-border shopping. We use a difference-in-differences estimation approach, drawing on universal product code-level store scanner data on taxed and untaxed beverages one-year pre-tax and two-year post-tax with Portland, Oregon, as the comparison site. Two-year post-tax, prices of taxed beverages increased by 1.04 cents per ounce (59% tax pass-through rate). Volume sold of taxed beverages fell by 22%. Declines were larger for family-size (29%) compared to individual-size (10%) beverages; particularly for soda (36% decrease for family-size compared to no change for individual-size). We found no change in volume sold of taxed beverages in Seattle's 2-mile border area, suggesting no cross-border shopping. Overall, we found a sustained impact of the Seattle SBT two-year post-tax implementation suggesting that sugar-sweetened beverage taxes may yield permanent reductions in demand for sugary beverages and associated health harms.

摘要

本研究考察了华盛顿州西雅图市甜饮料税(SBT)对饮料价格、销售量和跨境购物的更长期影响。我们采用了双重差分估计方法,利用两年内征税和未征税饮料的通用产品代码级商店扫描数据,以俄勒冈州波特兰市为对照地点。在征税两年后,征税饮料的价格每盎司上涨了 1.04 美分(59%的税收转嫁率)。征税饮料的销售量下降了 22%。家庭装(29%)的降幅大于个人装(10%);特别是苏打水(家庭装下降 36%,个人装不变)。我们没有发现西雅图 2 英里边境地区征税饮料销售量的变化,这表明没有跨境购物。总的来说,我们发现西雅图 SBT 实施两年后仍有持续影响,这表明含糖饮料税可能会导致对含糖饮料的需求永久减少,从而减少相关的健康危害。

相似文献

1
Impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax two-year post-tax implementation in Seattle, Washington, United States.美国华盛顿州西雅图市实施含糖饮料税后两年的影响。
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Dec;42(4):574-588. doi: 10.1057/s41271-021-00308-8. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
The impact of Seattle's Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices and volume sold.西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格和销售量的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100856. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.加利福尼亚州奥克兰市征收含糖饮料税后两年内对价格和销售量的长期影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114537. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
4
Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.评估西雅图含糖饮料税实施后糖销售量的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32271.
5
The Impact of Seattle's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax on Substitution to Sweets and Salty Snacks.西雅图含糖饮料税对甜食和咸点替代的影响。
J Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;151(10):3232-3239. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab194.
6
Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois.伊利诺伊州库克县实施和废除含糖饮料税后饮料价格和销售量变化的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031083. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31083.
7
The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.伊利诺伊州库克县含糖饮料税对饮料价格的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100855. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area.甜味饮料税对伊利诺伊州库克县及其边界地区饮料销售量的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 17;172(6):390-397. doi: 10.7326/M19-2961. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
10
Impact of a sweetened beverage tax on beverage prices in Seattle, WA.西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Dec;39:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100917. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumption responses to sweetened beverage taxes by household income in four U.S. cities.美国四个城市家庭收入对含糖饮料税的消费反应。
Health Econ. 2025 Jan;34(1):154-174. doi: 10.1002/hec.4905. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Decreases in purchases of energy, sodium, sugar, and saturated fat 3 years after implementation of the Chilean food labeling and marketing law: An interrupted time series analysis.智利食品标签和营销法实施 3 年后能量、钠、糖和饱和脂肪购买量的下降:一项中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 27;21(9):e1004463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004463. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.
实施全球饮食干预措施的效果:财政政策的范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
4
Sweetened Beverage Tax Implementation and Change in Body Mass Index Among Children in Seattle.西雅图含糖饮料征税与儿童体重指数变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13644.
5
Impact of soda tax on beverage price, sale, purchase, and consumption in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural experiments.美国苏打税对饮料价格、销售、购买和消费的影响:基于自然实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 22;11:1126569. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1126569. eCollection 2023.
6
Framing and Themes of the City of Boulder's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Coverage in the Local News From 2016 to 2018.2016年至2018年当地新闻中博尔德市含糖饮料税报道的框架与主题
AJPM Focus. 2023 Jan 20;2(2):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100068. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018).审视倡导联盟在加利福尼亚州全州含糖饮料税辩论(2001-2018 年)中的作用和策略。
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Jan;38(1):101-111. doi: 10.1177/08901171231201007. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
Sugar-sweetened beverage intake and convenience store shopping as mediators of the food insecurity-Tooth decay relationship among low-income children in Washington state.在华盛顿州,低收入儿童的食物不安全感与龋齿之间的关系中,含糖饮料摄入和便利店购物作为中介因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 12;18(9):e0290287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290287. eCollection 2023.
9
Modeled health economic and equity impact on dental caries and health outcomes from a 20% sugar sweetened beverages tax in Australia.澳大利亚对含糖饮料征收 20%的税对龋齿和健康结果的健康经济和公平影响建模。
Health Econ. 2023 Nov;32(11):2568-2582. doi: 10.1002/hec.4739. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
10
Evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Oakland, United States, 2015-2019: A quasi-experimental and cost-effectiveness study.2015-2019 年美国奥克兰市含糖饮料税评估:一项准实验和成本效益研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 18;20(4):e1004212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004212. eCollection 2023 Apr.