• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估西雅图含糖饮料税实施后糖销售量的变化。

Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago.

Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32271.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32271
PMID:34739061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8571660/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Adults and children routinely exceed recommended intake amounts of added sugars established by dietary guidelines. Taxes are used as a policy tool to reduce demand for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) given consumption-related adverse health outcomes but may induce substitution to other sources of added sugars.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent to which changes in grams of sugar sold from taxed beverages may be offset by changes in grams of sugar sold from untaxed beverages, sweets, and stand-alone sugar after the implementation of the Seattle, Washington, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT) on January 1, 2018.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study used difference-in-differences analyses to examine changes in grams of sugar sold from taxed and untaxed products in Seattle compared with Portland, Oregon, at year 1 and year 2 post tax. This study used Nielsen scanner data from supermarkets and mass merchandise as well as grocery, drug, convenience, and dollar stores on unit sales and measurements for beverage and food product universal product codes (UPCs) for each site for the pretax period (January 8-December 30, 2017) and the corresponding weeks in year 1 post tax (2018) and in year 2 post tax (2019). Nutritional analyses assessed grams of sugar for each UPC. The analytical balanced sample included 1326 taxed beverage UPCs, 239 untaxed beverage UPCs, 2054 sweets UPCs, and 81 stand-alone sugar UPCs. Statistical analysis was performed from January to August 2021.

EXPOSURES

Implementation of the Seattle SBT.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in grams of sugar sold from taxed beverages, untaxed beverages, sweets, and stand-alone sugar.

RESULTS

At both year 1 and year 2 post tax in Seattle compared with Portland, grams of sugar sold from taxed beverages decreased 23% (year 2 posttax ratio of incidence rate ratios [RIRR] = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.80). Sugar sold from untaxed beverages increased at year 1 post tax by 4% (RIRR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07) with no change at year 2 post tax. Sugar sold from sweets increased by 4% at both year 1 and year 2 post tax (year 2 posttax RIRR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06). There were no changes in stand-alone sugar sold.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study using difference-in-differences analysis found a net 19% reduction in grams of sugar sold from taxed SSBs at year 2 post tax after accounting for changes in sugar sold from untaxed beverages, sweets, and stand-alone sugar. These results suggest that SSB taxes may effectively yield permanent reductions in added sugars sold from SSBs in food stores.

摘要

重要性

成年人和儿童经常超过膳食指南建议的添加糖摄入量。鉴于与消费相关的不良健康后果,税收被用作减少含糖饮料(SSB)需求的政策工具,但可能会促使人们转而购买其他添加糖源的产品。

目的

在 2018 年 1 月 1 日西雅图华盛顿州甜味饮料税(SBT)实施后,评估从征税饮料中销售的糖量变化与从未征税饮料、甜食和独立糖中销售的糖量变化之间的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究采用差异分析方法,比较了西雅图和俄勒冈州波特兰在税收前后一年的征税和未征税产品中糖的销售量变化。本研究使用了来自超市和大众商品以及杂货店、药店、便利店和一元店的尼尔森扫描数据,以获得每个地点征税前(2017 年 1 月 8 日至 12 月 30 日)和税收后一年(2018 年)和税收后两年(2019 年)的饮料和食品产品通用产品代码(UPC)的单位销售和测量值。营养分析评估了每个 UPC 的糖含量。分析的平衡样本包括 1326 个征税饮料 UPC、239 个未征税饮料 UPC、2054 个甜食 UPC 和 81 个独立糖 UPC。统计分析于 2021 年 1 月至 8 月进行。

暴露

西雅图 SBT 的实施。

主要结果和测量指标

征税饮料、未征税饮料、甜食和独立糖的销售量变化。

结果

与波特兰相比,税收后一年和两年,征税饮料中糖的销售量分别下降了 23%(税收后两年的发病率比[RIRR]为 0.77;95%CI,0.73-0.80)。未征税饮料的销售量在税收后一年增加了 4%(RIRR 为 1.04;95%CI,1.00-1.07),税收后两年没有变化。甜食的销售量在税收后一年和两年都增加了 4%(税收后两年的 RIRR 为 1.04;95%CI,1.03-1.06)。独立糖的销售量没有变化。

结论和相关性

本研究采用差异分析发现,在考虑到未征税饮料、甜食和独立糖销售量变化后,税收后两年征税 SSB 的糖销售量净减少 19%。这些结果表明,SSB 税可能会有效地减少食品店中 SSB 销售的添加糖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e36/8571660/7d03c64db6b1/jamanetwopen-e2132271-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e36/8571660/a82e8fe349b6/jamanetwopen-e2132271-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e36/8571660/7d03c64db6b1/jamanetwopen-e2132271-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e36/8571660/a82e8fe349b6/jamanetwopen-e2132271-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e36/8571660/7d03c64db6b1/jamanetwopen-e2132271-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.评估西雅图含糖饮料税实施后糖销售量的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32271.
2
Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois.伊利诺伊州库克县实施和废除含糖饮料税后饮料价格和销售量变化的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031083. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31083.
3
The Impact of Seattle's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax on Substitution to Sweets and Salty Snacks.西雅图含糖饮料税对甜食和咸点替代的影响。
J Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;151(10):3232-3239. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab194.
4
The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area.甜味饮料税对伊利诺伊州库克县及其边界地区饮料销售量的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 17;172(6):390-397. doi: 10.7326/M19-2961. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
The impact of Seattle's Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices and volume sold.西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格和销售量的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100856. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
7
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
8
Impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax two-year post-tax implementation in Seattle, Washington, United States.美国华盛顿州西雅图市实施含糖饮料税后两年的影响。
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Dec;42(4):574-588. doi: 10.1057/s41271-021-00308-8. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.在大型城市环境中,对含糖和人工加糖饮料征收饮料税后,连锁零售商的饮料价格和销售额的变化情况。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1799-1810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4249.
10
Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.加利福尼亚州奥克兰市征收含糖饮料税后两年内对价格和销售量的长期影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114537. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Presence of Added Sugars and Other Sweeteners in Food and Beverage Products Advertised on Television in the United States, 2022.2022年美国电视广告中食品和饮料产品所含添加糖及其他甜味剂情况
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 21;16(23):3981. doi: 10.3390/nu16233981.
2
Consumption responses to sweetened beverage taxes by household income in four U.S. cities.美国四个城市家庭收入对含糖饮料税的消费反应。
Health Econ. 2025 Jan;34(1):154-174. doi: 10.1002/hec.4905. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Seattle's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax on Substitution to Sweets and Salty Snacks.西雅图含糖饮料税对甜食和咸点替代的影响。
J Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;151(10):3232-3239. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab194.
2
Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.甜味饮料税与费城独立商店饮料和高糖食品购买量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13527.
3
The impact of the Oakland SSB tax on prices and volume sold: A study of intended and unintended consequences.
实施全球饮食干预措施的效果:财政政策的范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
4
Sweetened Beverage Tax Implementation and Change in Body Mass Index Among Children in Seattle.西雅图含糖饮料征税与儿童体重指数变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13644.
5
Projected health and economic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Germany: A cross-validation modelling study.德国含糖饮料征税对健康和经济的预估影响:交叉验证模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 21;20(11):e1004311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004311. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Retail Soda Purchases Decrease and Water Purchases Increase: 6-Year Results From a Community-Based Beverage Campaign.零售苏打水购买量下降,水购买量增加:一项基于社区的饮料宣传活动的6年成果
AJPM Focus. 2022 Jun 30;1(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100008. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Systematic review on fiscal policy interventions in nutrition.关于财政政策对营养干预措施的系统评价。
Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 29;9:967494. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.967494. eCollection 2022.
8
Estimating the impact of nutrition and physical activity policies with quasi-experimental methods and simulation modelling: an integrative review of methods, challenges and synergies.运用准实验方法和模拟建模评估营养和身体活动政策的影响:方法、挑战和协同作用的综合评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;32(Suppl 4):iv84-iv91. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac051.
奥克兰 SSB 税对价格和销售量的影响:一项关于预期和非预期后果的研究。
Health Econ. 2021 Aug;30(8):1745-1771. doi: 10.1002/hec.4267. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
The effectiveness of sin food taxes: Evidence from Mexico.征收“罪恶食品”税的效果:来自墨西哥的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 May;77:102455. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102455. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
No Evidence of Food or Alcohol Substitution in Response to a Sweetened Beverage Tax.没有证据表明含糖饮料税会导致食品和酒类替代。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):e49-e57. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.021.
6
Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.奥克兰市的含糖饮料税:对成年人及儿童的价格、购买量和消费量的影响
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100865. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area.甜味饮料税对伊利诺伊州库克县及其边界地区饮料销售量的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 17;172(6):390-397. doi: 10.7326/M19-2961. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
The impact of Seattle's Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices and volume sold.西雅图含糖饮料税对饮料价格和销售量的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100856. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100856. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
The impact of the Cook County, IL, Sweetened Beverage Tax on beverage prices.伊利诺伊州库克县含糖饮料税对饮料价格的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100855. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100855. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue.美国按含糖量划分的含糖饮料销售量分布:对分级征税和税收收入的影响。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Jun;41(2):125-138. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00217-x.