Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.
Center for Cognitive and Memory Disorders, Ohio State University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jun;151(6):1377-1393. doi: 10.1037/xge0001133. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
One hundred and five memory disordered (MD) patients and 57 controls were tested on item recognition memory and lexical decision tasks, and diffusion model analyses were conducted on accuracy and response time distributions for correct and error responses. The diffusion model fit the data well for the MD patients and control subjects, the results replicated earlier studies with young and older adults, and individual differences were consistent between the item recognition and lexical decision tasks. In the diffusion model analysis, MD patients had lower drift rates (with mild Alzheimer's [AD] patients lower than mild cognitive impairment [MCI] patients) as well as wider boundaries and longer nondecision times. These data and results were used in a series of studies to examine how well MD patients could be discriminated from controls using machine-learning techniques, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and support vector machines (all of which produced similar results). There was about 83% accuracy in separating MD from controls, and within the MD group, AD patients had about 90% accuracy and MCI patients had about 68% accuracy (controls had about 90% accuracy). These methods might offer an adjunct to traditional clinical diagnosis. Limitations are noted including difficulties in obtaining a matched group of control subjects as well as the possibility of misdiagnosis of MD patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
105 名记忆障碍(MD)患者和 57 名对照者接受了项目识别记忆和词汇判断任务的测试,并对正确和错误反应的准确性和反应时间分布进行了扩散模型分析。扩散模型很好地适用于 MD 患者和对照组的数据,结果与年轻和老年成年人的早期研究相吻合,并且项目识别和词汇判断任务之间的个体差异是一致的。在扩散模型分析中,MD 患者的漂移率较低(轻度阿尔茨海默病 [AD] 患者的漂移率低于轻度认知障碍 [MCI] 患者),边界较宽,非决策时间较长。这些数据和结果被用于一系列研究中,以检查使用机器学习技术、线性判别分析、逻辑回归和支持向量机(所有这些技术都产生了相似的结果)从对照者中区分 MD 患者的效果。MD 患者与对照者的分离准确率约为 83%,在 MD 患者组中,AD 患者的准确率约为 90%,MCI 患者的准确率约为 68%(对照者的准确率约为 90%)。这些方法可能为传统的临床诊断提供补充。需要注意的是,包括难以获得匹配的对照组以及 MD 患者误诊的可能性在内的局限性。