• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用识别记忆的扩散模型参数区分记忆障碍患者和对照组。

Discriminating memory disordered patients from controls using diffusion model parameters from recognition memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.

Center for Cognitive and Memory Disorders, Ohio State University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jun;151(6):1377-1393. doi: 10.1037/xge0001133. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001133
PMID:34735185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9065216/
Abstract

One hundred and five memory disordered (MD) patients and 57 controls were tested on item recognition memory and lexical decision tasks, and diffusion model analyses were conducted on accuracy and response time distributions for correct and error responses. The diffusion model fit the data well for the MD patients and control subjects, the results replicated earlier studies with young and older adults, and individual differences were consistent between the item recognition and lexical decision tasks. In the diffusion model analysis, MD patients had lower drift rates (with mild Alzheimer's [AD] patients lower than mild cognitive impairment [MCI] patients) as well as wider boundaries and longer nondecision times. These data and results were used in a series of studies to examine how well MD patients could be discriminated from controls using machine-learning techniques, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and support vector machines (all of which produced similar results). There was about 83% accuracy in separating MD from controls, and within the MD group, AD patients had about 90% accuracy and MCI patients had about 68% accuracy (controls had about 90% accuracy). These methods might offer an adjunct to traditional clinical diagnosis. Limitations are noted including difficulties in obtaining a matched group of control subjects as well as the possibility of misdiagnosis of MD patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

105 名记忆障碍(MD)患者和 57 名对照者接受了项目识别记忆和词汇判断任务的测试,并对正确和错误反应的准确性和反应时间分布进行了扩散模型分析。扩散模型很好地适用于 MD 患者和对照组的数据,结果与年轻和老年成年人的早期研究相吻合,并且项目识别和词汇判断任务之间的个体差异是一致的。在扩散模型分析中,MD 患者的漂移率较低(轻度阿尔茨海默病 [AD] 患者的漂移率低于轻度认知障碍 [MCI] 患者),边界较宽,非决策时间较长。这些数据和结果被用于一系列研究中,以检查使用机器学习技术、线性判别分析、逻辑回归和支持向量机(所有这些技术都产生了相似的结果)从对照者中区分 MD 患者的效果。MD 患者与对照者的分离准确率约为 83%,在 MD 患者组中,AD 患者的准确率约为 90%,MCI 患者的准确率约为 68%(对照者的准确率约为 90%)。这些方法可能为传统的临床诊断提供补充。需要注意的是,包括难以获得匹配的对照组以及 MD 患者误诊的可能性在内的局限性。

相似文献

1
Discriminating memory disordered patients from controls using diffusion model parameters from recognition memory.使用识别记忆的扩散模型参数区分记忆障碍患者和对照组。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jun;151(6):1377-1393. doi: 10.1037/xge0001133. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Scoring algorithms for a computer-based cognitive screening tool: An illustrative example of overfitting machine learning approaches and the impact on estimates of classification accuracy.基于计算机的认知筛查工具的评分算法:机器学习方法过度拟合的实例说明及其对分类准确性估计的影响。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Nov;31(11):1377-1382. doi: 10.1037/pas0000764. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
3
Predicting Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Machine Learning Classification of Multimodal Multicenter Diffusion-Tensor and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.使用多模态多中心扩散张量和磁共振成像数据的机器学习分类法预测轻度认知障碍受试者的前驱阿尔茨海默病
J Neuroimaging. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):738-47. doi: 10.1111/jon.12214. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Use of Speech Analyses within a Mobile Application for the Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly People.在移动应用程序中使用语音分析评估老年人认知障碍
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(2):120-129. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170829111942.
5
Face-Name Associative Recognition Deficits in Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment.主观认知衰退和轻度认知障碍中的面容-姓名联想识别缺陷
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(3):1185-1196. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160637.
6
Characteristics of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using the Thai Version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Tests: A Multivariate and Machine Learning Study.使用阿尔茨海默病评估联盟测试的泰语版评估轻度认知障碍的特征:一项多元和机器学习研究。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;45(1-2):38-48. doi: 10.1159/000487232. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease for different neuropsychological Mild Cognitive Impairment subtypes: A hierarchical meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.不同神经心理学轻度认知障碍亚型进展为阿尔茨海默病的风险:纵向研究的层次荟萃分析。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Nov;33(7):1007-1021. doi: 10.1037/pag0000294. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Associative learning and regional white matter deficits in mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍中的联想学习与局部白质缺陷
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(2):421-30. doi: 10.3233/JAD-131682.
9
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Combination of Two Measures of Verbal Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease.两种言语记忆测量方法联合应用对阿尔茨海默病所致轻度认知障碍的诊断及预后价值
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):909-918. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170073.
10
Early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's with event-related potentials and event-related desynchronization in N-back working memory tasks.采用 N -back 工作记忆任务中的事件相关电位和事件相关去同步化对轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病进行早期诊断。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Oct;164:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Partially Observable Predictor Models for Identifying Cognitive Markers.用于识别认知标志物的部分可观测预测模型
Comput Brain Behav. 2025;8(3):410-420. doi: 10.1007/s42113-025-00238-8. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
A Diffusion Model Account of Cognitive Variability in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment.健康衰老和轻度认知障碍中认知变异性的扩散模型解释
Exp Aging Res. 2025 May-Jun;51(3):285-302. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2024.2409588. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
3
Episodic memory assessment: effects of sex and age on performance and response time during a continuous recognition task.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of screening instruments for the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in hospital inpatients: A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies.用于检测医院住院患者痴呆和轻度认知障碍的筛查工具的有效性:诊断准确性研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0219569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219569. eCollection 2019.
2
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with Electroencephalography in a differential framework.在鉴别框架下使用脑电图诊断阿尔茨海默病。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0193607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193607. eCollection 2018.
3
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of automated tests for cognitive impairment.
情景记忆评估:在连续识别任务中性别和年龄对表现及反应时间的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 4;18:1304221. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1304221. eCollection 2024.
4
Cognitive, Emotional, and Daily Functioning Domains Involved in Decision-Making among Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.轻度认知障碍患者决策过程中涉及的认知、情感和日常功能领域:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 14;14(3):278. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030278.
5
Cognitive Signatures of Depressive and Anhedonic Symptoms and Affective States Using Computational Modeling and Neurocognitive Testing.使用计算建模和神经认知测试研究抑郁和快感缺失症状及情感状态的认知特征。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Jul;9(7):726-736. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
6
Parsing memory and nonmemory contributions to age-related declines in mnemonic discrimination performance: a hierarchical Bayesian diffusion decision modeling approach.解析记忆和非记忆对年龄相关记忆辨别表现下降的贡献:一种分层贝叶斯扩散决策建模方法。
Learn Mem. 2023 Nov 3;30(11):296-309. doi: 10.1101/lm.053838.123. Print 2023 Nov.
7
Correctness and response time distributions in the MemTrax continuous recognition task: Analysis of strategies and a reverse-exponential model.MemTrax连续识别任务中的正确性和响应时间分布:策略分析与反向指数模型
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;14:1005298. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1005298. eCollection 2022.
8
Can neuropsychological testing be improved with model-based approaches?神经心理学测试能否通过基于模型的方法得到改善?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;26(11):899-901. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.015. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
9
Integrated diffusion models for distance effects in number memory.数记忆中距离效应的综合扩散模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Nov;138:101516. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101516. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
一项关于认知障碍自动检测诊断准确性的系统评价。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;33(4):561-575. doi: 10.1002/gps.4852. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength.识别记忆中脑电图的单试验分析:追踪记忆强度的神经关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):128-141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.扩散决策模型:当前问题与历史
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):260-281. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
6
Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.认知神经科学中的序贯抽样模型:优势、应用与扩展
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:641-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
7
Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.决策的二择扩散模型中的个体差异与拟合方法
Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015. doi: 10.1037/dec0000030.
8
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.模拟计算能力方面反应时间和准确性的个体差异。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:115-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic accuracy in Alzheimer's disease: a synthesis of existing evidence.阿尔茨海默病诊断准确性的敏感性和特异性:现有证据的综合分析。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013 Jun;28(4):337-47. doi: 10.1177/1533317513488910. Epub 2013 May 17.
10
Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.扩散模型中的参数可变性和分布假设。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):281-92. doi: 10.1037/a0030775. Epub 2012 Nov 12.