• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经心理学测试能否通过基于模型的方法得到改善？

Can neuropsychological testing be improved with model-based approaches?

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;26(11):899-901. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.015. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.015
PMID:36153231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9667530/
Abstract

There has been little impact of cognitive psychology and modeling on neuropsychological testing for over 50 years. There is also a disconnect between those tests and the constructs they are said to measure. We discuss studies at the interface between testing and modeling that illustrate the opportunity for advances.

摘要

认知心理学和建模对神经心理学测试的影响微乎其微，已经超过 50 年了。这些测试与它们声称要测量的结构之间也存在脱节。我们讨论了测试和建模之间的界面研究，这些研究说明了取得进展的机会。

相似文献

1
Can neuropsychological testing be improved with model-based approaches?神经心理学测试能否通过基于模型的方法得到改善？
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;26(11):899-901. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.015. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Trends on the application of serious games to neuropsychological evaluation: A scoping review.严肃游戏在神经心理学评估中的应用趋势：一项范围综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:296-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
3
The positive side of effort: A review of the impact of motivation and engagement on neuropsychological performance.努力的积极面：动机与参与度对神经心理表现影响的综述
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(4):312-317. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1458502.
4
Neuropsychological testing.神经心理学测试。
Pract Neurol. 2018 Jun;18(3):227-237. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2017-001743. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
5
Mild cognitive impairment: a concept and diagnostic entity in need of input from neuropsychology.轻度认知障碍：一个需要神经心理学投入的概念和诊断实体。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Feb;20(2):129-34. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000010. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
6
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A pilot study for using longitudinal cognitive and neuropsychological testing for functional outcomes.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血：一项关于使用纵向认知和神经心理学测试评估功能预后的初步研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;194:105941. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105941. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Does the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) Distinguish Between Cognitive Domains in Healthy Older Adults?剑桥自动化神经心理测试组（CANTAB）能否区分健康老年人的认知领域？
Assessment. 2016 Apr;23(2):163-72. doi: 10.1177/1073191115581474. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
8
Back to the drawing board-The relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in clinical cohorts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.回到绘图板——临床队列中自我报告与神经心理学认知灵活性测试之间的关系：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychology. 2022 Jul;36(5):347-372. doi: 10.1037/neu0000796. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Criterion and convergent validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment with screening and standardized neuropsychological testing.蒙特利尔认知评估量表与筛查和标准化神经心理学测试的效标和 convergent 效度。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Dec;61(12):2181-2185. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12541. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
10
Neuropsychological function in Tourette syndrome.抽动秽语综合征的神经心理功能
Adv Neurol. 2001;85:103-11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Diffusion Model Account of Cognitive Variability in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment.健康衰老和轻度认知障碍中认知变异性的扩散模型解释
Exp Aging Res. 2025 May-Jun;51(3):285-302. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2024.2409588. Epub 2024 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Discriminating memory disordered patients from controls using diffusion model parameters from recognition memory.使用识别记忆的扩散模型参数区分记忆障碍患者和对照组。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jun;151(6):1377-1393. doi: 10.1037/xge0001133. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Improving neurocognitive testing using computational psychiatry-A systematic review for ADHD.利用计算精神病学改善神经认知测试——ADHD 的系统综述。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Feb;147(2):169-231. doi: 10.1037/bul0000319. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
3
Understanding the Profile of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairments: A Critique of Meta-Analyses.了解癌症相关认知障碍的特征：对荟萃分析的批判。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Oct 1;111(10):1009-1015. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz100.
4
Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.大规模分析自我调节措施的重测信度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5472-5477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818430116. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
Modeling Regularities in Response Time and Accuracy Data with the Diffusion Model.用扩散模型对反应时间和准确性数据中的规律进行建模。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015 Dec;24(6):458-470. doi: 10.1177/0963721415596228.
6
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.模拟计算能力方面反应时间和准确性的个体差异。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:115-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
New approaches to understand cognitive changes associated with chemotherapy for non-central nervous system tumors.探讨与非中枢神经系统肿瘤化疗相关认知变化的新方法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Nov;46(5):707-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
8
International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer.国际认知与癌症工作组关于协调癌症患者认知功能研究的建议。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):703-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70294-1. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
9
Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.个体差异、衰老与二选一任务中的智商
Cogn Psychol. 2010 May;60(3):127-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
10
The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.扩散决策模型：二选一决策任务的理论与数据
Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420.