• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险的家庭保健利用、结果和成本比较。

A Comparison of Home Health Utilization, Outcomes, and Cost Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.

机构信息

Humana Healthcare Research.

Humana Inc., Louisville, KY.

出版信息

Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001661.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001661
PMID:34739413
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home health use is rising rapidly in the United States as the population ages, the prevalence of chronic disease increases, and older Americans express their desire to age at home. Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans rather than Traditional Medicare (TM) has grown as well, from 13% of total Medicare enrollment in 2004 to 39% in 2020. Despite these shifts, little is known about outcomes and costs following home health in MA as compared with TM.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to measure the association of MA enrollment with outcomes and costs for patients using home health.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients enrolled in plans offered by 1 large, national MA organization and patients enrolled in TM, with at least 1 home health visit between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018.

EXPOSURE

MA enrollment.

MAIN MEASURES

We compared the intensity of home health services and types of care delivered. The main outcome measures were hospitalization, the proportion of days in the home, and total allowed costs during the 180-day period following the first qualifying home health visit during the study period.

KEY RESULTS

Among patients who used home health, our models demonstrated enrollment in MA was associated with 14%, and 6% decreased odds of 60- and 180-day hospitalization, respectively, a 12.8% and 14.7% decrease in medical costs exclusive and inclusive of home health costs, respectively, and a 0.27% increase in the proportion of days at home during the 180-day follow-up, equivalent to an additional half-day at home. There were few differences in home health care delivered for MA and TM [mean number of visits in the first episode of care (17.1 vs. 17.3) and mean visits per week (3.2 vs. 3.3)]. The mean number of visits by visit type and percent of patients with each type was similar between MA and TM as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with enrollment in TM, enrollment in MA was associated with improved patient-centered outcomes and lower cost and utilization, despite few differences in the way home health was delivered. These findings might be explained by structural components of MA that encourage better care management, but further investigation is needed to clarify the mechanisms by which MA enrollment may lead to higher value home health care.

摘要

背景

随着人口老龄化、慢性病患病率上升以及越来越多的美国老年人希望在家中养老,美国的家庭医疗保健使用量迅速增长。此外,选择医疗保险优势计划(MA)而非传统医疗保险(TM)的人数也在增加,从 2004 年的医疗保险总参保人数的 13%增长到 2020 年的 39%。尽管发生了这些变化,但与 TM 相比,关于 MA 下家庭医疗保健的结局和成本的信息却很少。

目的

本研究旨在衡量 MA 参保与使用家庭医疗保健的患者结局和成本之间的关联。

设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究。

参与者

2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日期间,参加了一家大型全国性 MA 组织提供的计划的患者,以及参加 TM 的患者,至少有一次家庭医疗保健访问。

暴露因素

MA 参保。

主要测量指标

我们比较了家庭医疗保健服务的强度和提供的护理类型。主要结局指标为住院、在家天数比例以及研究期间首次符合资格的家庭医疗保健访问后 180 天内的总允许费用。

主要结果

在使用家庭医疗保健的患者中,我们的模型表明,MA 参保与 60 天和 180 天住院的可能性分别降低 14%和 6%,医疗费用分别降低 12.8%和 14.7%,不包括家庭医疗保健费用的医疗费用分别降低 6%和 8%,以及在 180 天随访期间在家天数比例增加 0.27%,相当于在家时间增加了半天。MA 和 TM 之间家庭医疗保健服务交付的差异很小[首次护理发作的平均就诊次数(17.1 次 vs. 17.3 次)和每周就诊次数(3.2 次 vs. 3.3 次)]。MA 和 TM 之间的每种就诊类型的平均就诊次数和就诊患者比例也相似。

结论

与 TM 参保相比,MA 参保与改善以患者为中心的结局以及降低成本和利用率相关,尽管家庭医疗保健的提供方式几乎没有差异。这些发现可能可以用 MA 的结构组成来解释,这些结构组成鼓励更好的医疗保健管理,但需要进一步调查以阐明 MA 参保如何导致更高价值的家庭医疗保健。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Home Health Utilization, Outcomes, and Cost Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险的家庭保健利用、结果和成本比较。
Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001661.
2
Health Care Utilization, Care Satisfaction, and Health Status for Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险的阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者和非患者的医疗保健利用、护理满意度和健康状况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201809. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1809.
3
Comparison of Health Care Utilization by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With Complex Care Needs.比较有复杂医疗需求的医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险受益人对医疗保健的利用。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223451. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3451.
4
Assessment of Differences in Inpatient Rehabilitation Services for Length of Stay and Health Outcomes Between US Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries.评估美国医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险受益人在住院康复服务方面的住院时间和健康结果差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1204.
5
Differences in Home Health Services and Outcomes Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划在家庭保健服务和结果方面的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e235454. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5454.
6
Health Care Utilization and Spending in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险的医疗保健利用和支出比较:差异中的差异分析。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 10;2(12):e214001. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4001. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务传统 Medicare 与 Medicare Advantage 受益人的家庭保健机构的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622.
8
Comparing Receipt of Prescribed Post-acute Home Health Care Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries: an Observational Study.比较医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险受益人接受规定的急性后期家庭保健服务的情况:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2323-2331. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06282-3. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
9
Comparison of the Pathway to Hospice Enrollment Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.比较医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险的临终关怀入院途径。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Feb 3;4(2):e225457. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5457.
10
Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare.术后护理机构(SNF)后结局和成本比较:医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Apr;27(4):140-146. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88616.

引用本文的文献

1
Specialization of Home Health Agencies to Deliver Care for Medicare Advantage Patients.居家健康机构专门为医疗保险优势计划患者提供护理服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525336. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25336.
2
Total and Out-of-Pocket Costs Surrounding Emergency Department Care Among Older Adults Enrolled in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.老年人在传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划下急诊护理的总费用和自付费用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
Medicare Advantage and Home Health Care: A Systematic Review.
医疗保险优势与家庭医疗保健:一项系统综述。
Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):333-345. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001992. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Differences in Home Health Services and Outcomes Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划在家庭保健服务和结果方面的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e235454. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5454.
5
Prevalence of use and characteristics of users of home-based medical care in Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势计划中家庭医疗保健的使用情况和使用者特征的流行率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):455-462. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18085. Epub 2022 Oct 12.