• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错误推文传播:意大利推特用户中的疫苗犹豫现象分析

Mis-tweeting communication: a Vaccine Hesitancy analysis among twitter users in Italy.

作者信息

Gori Davide, Durazzi Francesco, Montalti Marco, Di Valerio Zeno, Reno Chiara, Fantini Maria Pia, Remondini Daniel

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna.

Department of Physics, University of Bologna.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2021 Oct 5;92(S6):e2021416. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12251.

DOI:10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12251
PMID:34739459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8851020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A previously unseen body of scientific knowledge of varying quality has been produced during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. It has proven extremely difficult to navigate for experts and laymen alike, originating a phenomenon described as "Infodemic", a breeding ground for misinformation. This has a potential impact on vaccine hesitancy that must be considered in a situation where efficient vaccination campaigns are of the greatest importance. We aimed at describing the polarization and volumes of Italian language tweets in the months before and after the start of the vaccination campaign in Italy.

METHODS

Tweets were sampled in the October 2020-January 2021 period. The characteristics of the dataset were analyzed after manual annotation as Anti-Vax, Pro-Vax and Neutral, which allowed for the definition of a polarity score for each tweet.

RESULTS

Based on the annotated tweets, we could identify 29.6% of the 2,538 unique users as anti-Vax and 12.1% as pro-Vax, with a strong disagreement in annotation in 7.1% of the tweets. We observed a change in the proportion of retweets to anti-Vax and pro-Vax messages after the start of the vaccination campaign in Italy. Although the most shared tweets are those of opposite orientation, the most retweeted users are moderately polarized.  Conclusions: The disagreement on the manual classification of tweets highlights a potential risk for misinterpretation of tweets among the general population. Our study reinforces the need to focus Public Health's attention on the new social media with the aim of increasing vaccine confidence, especially in the context of the current pandemic.

摘要

背景与目的

在持续的新冠疫情期间,产生了一批质量参差不齐、此前未见的科学知识。事实证明,无论是专家还是普通民众,都极难梳理这些知识,由此产生了一种被称为“信息疫情”的现象,这是错误信息的滋生地。在高效的疫苗接种运动至关重要的情况下,这可能会对疫苗犹豫产生影响,必须予以考虑。我们旨在描述意大利疫苗接种运动开始前后几个月意大利语推文的两极分化情况和数量。

方法

在2020年10月至2021年1月期间对推文进行采样。在将数据集手动标注为反疫苗、支持疫苗和中性后,对其特征进行分析,这使得能够为每条推文定义一个极性分数。

结果

根据标注的推文,我们可以确定在2538名独特用户中,29.6%为反疫苗用户,12.1%为支持疫苗用户,7.1%的推文在标注上存在强烈分歧。我们观察到意大利疫苗接种运动开始后,转发反疫苗和支持疫苗信息的比例发生了变化。尽管分享最多的推文是那些立场相反的,但转发最多的用户两极分化程度适中。结论:推文手动分类上的分歧凸显了普通民众对推文误解的潜在风险。我们的研究强化了公共卫生部门需要关注新社交媒体的必要性,以提高疫苗信心,尤其是在当前疫情背景下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/b29637992a3d/ACTA-92-416-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/db6ad95996d4/ACTA-92-416-s001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/76ab3c1c830e/ACTA-92-416-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/cafcf6b60759/ACTA-92-416-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/b29637992a3d/ACTA-92-416-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/db6ad95996d4/ACTA-92-416-s001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/76ab3c1c830e/ACTA-92-416-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/cafcf6b60759/ACTA-92-416-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1806/8851020/b29637992a3d/ACTA-92-416-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mis-tweeting communication: a Vaccine Hesitancy analysis among twitter users in Italy.错误推文传播:意大利推特用户中的疫苗犹豫现象分析
Acta Biomed. 2021 Oct 5;92(S6):e2021416. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12251.
2
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
3
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.追踪加拿大推特上公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度:使用基于方面的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
4
ANTi-Vax: a novel Twitter dataset for COVID-19 vaccine misinformation detection.抗疫苗:用于 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息检测的新型 Twitter 数据集。
Public Health. 2022 Feb;203:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
5
How the Italian Twitter Conversation on Vaccines Changed During the First Phase of the Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Analysis.意大利推特疫苗对话在大流行第一阶段如何变化:混合方法分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:824465. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.824465. eCollection 2022.
6
Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.研究 COVID-19 期间加拿大公共卫生机构和决策者的推文内容和参与度:混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 11;23(3):e24883. doi: 10.2196/24883.
7
The COVID-19 vaccine social media : healthcare providers' missed dose in addressing misinformation and vaccine hesitancy.新冠疫苗与社交媒体:医疗服务提供者在应对错误信息和疫苗犹豫方面的疏漏
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):2962-2964. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1912551. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
Topics in Antivax and Provax Discourse: Yearlong Synoptic Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets.抗疫苗和支持疫苗言论主题:对 COVID-19 疫苗推文的全年综合研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 8;25:e45069. doi: 10.2196/45069.
9
Content and Dynamics of Websites Shared Over Vaccine-Related Tweets in COVID-19 Conversations: Computational Analysis.网站内容和动态在 COVID-19 对话中的疫苗相关推文分享:计算分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 3;23(12):e29127. doi: 10.2196/29127.
10
Spread of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation in the Ninth Inning: Retrospective Observational Infodemic Study.新冠疫苗错误信息在最后阶段的传播:回顾性观察性信息疫情研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Mar 16;2(1):e33587. doi: 10.2196/33587. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Influencers and Echo Chambers in the Diffusion of Vaccine Misinformation: Opinion Mining in a Taiwanese Online Community.影响者和信息茧房在疫苗错误信息传播中的作用:台湾在线社区的观点挖掘
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Aug 18;5:e57951. doi: 10.2196/57951.
2
Spreading of misinformation on mass media and digital platforms regarding vaccines. A systematic scoping review on stakeholders, policymakers, and sentiments/behavior of Italian consumers.大众媒体和数字平台上有关疫苗的错误信息传播。对利益相关者、政策制定者以及意大利消费者的情绪/行为的系统范围审查。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2259398. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2259398. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clusters of science and health related Twitter users become more isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,与科学和健康相关的推特用户群体变得更加孤立。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 4;11(1):19655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99301-0.
2
Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccines Acceptance: Results from a Survey on Vaccine Hesitancy in Northern Italy.提高新冠疫苗接种率:意大利北部疫苗犹豫情况调查结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;9(4):378. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040378.
3
Are We Ready for the Arrival of the New COVID-19 Vaccinations? Great Promises and Unknown Challenges Still to Come.
Topics in Antivax and Provax Discourse: Yearlong Synoptic Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets.
抗疫苗和支持疫苗言论主题:对 COVID-19 疫苗推文的全年综合研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 8;25:e45069. doi: 10.2196/45069.
4
Media Data and Vaccine Hesitancy: Scoping Review.媒体数据与疫苗犹豫:范围综述
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 10;2(2):e37300. doi: 10.2196/37300. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
5
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Italian Adults with Marfan Syndrome: Insights from a Secondary Analysis of a Cross-Sectional Study.意大利马凡氏综合征成年患者对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:一项横断面研究的二次分析见解
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 26;11(4):734. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040734.
6
Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature.社交媒体与对新冠疫苗接种的态度:文献系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jun;48:101454. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101454. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
Vaccine Hesitancy: Lessons Learned and Perspectives for a Post-Pandemic Tomorrow.疫苗犹豫:疫情后的经验教训与展望
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;10(4):551. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040551.
我们准备好迎接新型新冠疫苗的到来了吗?巨大的希望与未知的挑战仍将接踵而至。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;9(2):173. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020173.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates.全球对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫态度:疫苗接受率的简明系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 16;9(2):160. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020160.
5
The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis.社交媒体上的反疫苗信息疫情:行为分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247642. eCollection 2021.
6
An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter.关于推特上新冠疫情错误信息的探索性研究。
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Mar;22:100104. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
High Rates of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Its Association with Conspiracy Beliefs: A Study in Jordan and Kuwait among Other Arab Countries.新冠疫苗犹豫率高及其与阴谋论的关联:在约旦、科威特及其他阿拉伯国家开展的一项研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;9(1):42. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010042.
8
Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Sentiment Analysis from June 2011 to April 2019.社交媒体上的疫苗犹豫情绪:2011年6月至2019年4月的情感分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 7;9(1):28. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010028.
9
Reproductive number of coronavirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence.冠状病毒的繁殖数:基于全球水平证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0242128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242128. eCollection 2020.
10
A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine.一项针对 COVID-19 疫苗潜在接受度的全球调查。
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. Epub 2020 Oct 20.