Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India.
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):2012. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12028-5.
The study aims to estimate the prevalence of Intimate partner violence (IPV) in India, and changes observed over a decade as per the nationally representative datasets from National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) Round 3 and 4. We also highlight various socio-demographic characteristics associated with different types of IPV in India. The NFHS round 3 and 4 interviewed 124,385, and 699,686 women respondents aged 15-49 years using a multi-stage sampling method across 29 states and 2 union territories in India. For IPV, we only included ever-married women (64,607, and 62,716) from the two rounds. Primary outcomes of the study was prevalence of the ever-experience of different types of IPV: physical, emotional, and sexual violence by ever-married women aged 15 to 49 years. The secondary outcome included predictors of different forms of IPV, and changes in the prevalence of different types of IPV compared to the previous round of the NFHS survey.
As per NFHS-4, weighted prevalence of physical, sexual, emotional, or any kind of IPV ever-experienced by women were 29.2%, 6.7%, 13.2%, and 32.8%. These subtypes of IPV depicted a relative change of - 14.9%, - 30.2%, - 11.0%, - 15.7% compared to round 3. Significant state-wise variations were observed in the prevalence. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis highlighted women's and partner's education, socio-economic status, women empowerment, urban-rural residence, partner's controlling behaviours as major significant predictors of IPV.
Our study findings suggest high prevalence of IPV with state-wise variations in the prevalence. Similar factors were responsible for different forms of IPV. Therefore, based on existing evidences, it is recommended to offer adequate screening and counselling services for the couples, especially in health-care settings so that they speak up against IPV, and are offered timely help to prevent long-term physical and mental health consequences.
本研究旨在评估印度亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的流行率,并根据全国家庭健康调查(NFHS)第三轮和第四轮的全国代表性数据集,观察十年来的变化。我们还强调了与印度不同类型 IPV 相关的各种社会人口学特征。NFHS 第三轮和第四轮分别采访了印度 29 个邦和 2 个联邦属地的 124385 名和 699686 名年龄在 15-49 岁的女性受访者,采用多阶段抽样方法。对于 IPV,我们仅将两轮调查中的已婚女性(64607 名和 62716 名)纳入研究。本研究的主要结果是评估 15 至 49 岁的已婚女性经历不同类型 IPV 的流行率:身体、情感和性暴力。次要结果包括不同形式 IPV 的预测因素,以及与 NFHS 调查前一轮相比,不同类型 IPV 流行率的变化。
根据 NFHS-4,女性经历过的身体、性、情感或任何形式的 IPV 的加权流行率分别为 29.2%、6.7%、13.2%和 32.8%。与第三轮相比,这些 IPV 亚型的相对变化分别为-14.9%、-30.2%、-11.0%和-15.7%。在流行率方面观察到显著的邦际差异。多变量二元逻辑回归分析强调了妇女和伴侣的教育、社会经济地位、妇女赋权、城乡居住、伴侣的控制行为是 IPV 的主要重要预测因素。
我们的研究结果表明,IPV 的流行率很高,而且存在邦际差异。类似的因素导致了不同形式的 IPV。因此,根据现有证据,建议在卫生保健环境中为夫妇提供充分的筛查和咨询服务,以便他们敢于反对 IPV,并及时获得帮助,以防止长期的身心健康后果。