Miljevic Aleksandra, Bailey Neil W, Vila-Rodriguez Fidel, Herring Sally E, Fitzgerald Paul B
Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Epworth HealthCare, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.
Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Epworth HealthCare, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Jun;7(6):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
Brain connectivity can be estimated through many analyses applied to electroencephalography (EEG) data. However, substantial heterogeneity in the implementation of connectivity methods exists. Heterogeneity in conceptualization of connectivity measures, data collection, or data preprocessing may be associated with variability in robustness of measurement. While it is difficult to compare the results of studies using different EEG connectivity measures, standardization of processing and reporting may facilitate the task. We discuss how factors such as referencing, epoch length and number, controls for volume conduction, artifact removal, and statistical control of multiple comparisons influence the EEG connectivity estimate for connectivity measures, and what can be done to control for potential confounds associated with these factors. Based on the results reported in previous literature, this article presents recommendations and a novel checklist developed for quality assessment of EEG connectivity studies. This checklist and its recommendations are made in an effort to draw attention to factors that may influence connectivity estimates and factors that need to be improved in future research. Standardization of procedures and reporting in EEG connectivity may lead to EEG connectivity studies being made more synthesizable and comparable despite variations in the methodology underlying connectivity estimates.
脑连接性可通过应用于脑电图(EEG)数据的多种分析方法进行估计。然而,连接性方法的实施存在很大的异质性。连接性测量、数据收集或数据预处理在概念化方面的异质性可能与测量稳健性的变异性相关。虽然使用不同EEG连接性测量方法的研究结果难以比较,但处理和报告的标准化可能有助于这项任务。我们讨论诸如参考电极设置、时段长度和数量、容积传导控制、伪迹去除以及多重比较的统计控制等因素如何影响连接性测量的EEG连接性估计,以及如何控制与这些因素相关的潜在混杂因素。基于先前文献报道的结果,本文提出了建议以及为EEG连接性研究质量评估而制定的新颖清单。这份清单及其建议旨在提请注意可能影响连接性估计的因素以及未来研究中需要改进的因素。尽管连接性估计背后的方法存在差异,但EEG连接性程序和报告的标准化可能会使EEG连接性研究更具可综合性和可比性。