Suppr超能文献

联合国际共识声明:关于健康和医学领域众包挑战竞赛:改良德尔菲法的结果。

Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health (SESH), Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):e048699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop.

SETTING

Uganda for face-to-face consensus activities, global for online survey questionnaires.

PARTICIPANTS

A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened at a consensus-development conference in Uganda and included 21 researchers with experience leading challenge contests, five public health sector workers, and nine Ugandan end users. An online survey was sent to 140 corresponding authors of previously published articles that had used crowdsourcing methods.

RESULTS

A subgroup of expert panel members developed the initial statement and survey. We received responses from 120 (85.7%) survey participants, which were presented at an in-person workshop of all 21 panel members. Panelists discussed each of the sections, revised the statement, and participated in a second round of the survey questionnaire. Based on this second survey round, we held detailed discussions of each subsection with workshop participants and further revised the consensus statement. We then conducted the third round of the questionnaire among the 21 expert panelists and used the results to finalize the statement. This iterative process resulted in 23 final statement items, all with greater than 80% consensus. Statement items are organised into the seven stages of a challenge contest, including the following: considering the appropriateness, organising a community steering committee, promoting the contest, assessing contributions, recognising contributors, sharing ideas and evaluating the contest (COPARSE).

CONCLUSIONS

There is high agreement among crowdsourcing experts and stakeholders on the design and implementation of crowdsourcing challenge contests. The COPARSE consensus statement can be used to organise crowdsourcing challenge contests, improve the rigour and reproducibility of crowdsourcing research and enable large-scale collaboration.

摘要

目的

制定共识声明,就公共卫生和医学领域设计、实施和评估众包挑战赛提供建议。

方法

使用三轮问卷调查和一次共识研讨会对改良 Delphi 法进行修改。

设置

乌干达用于面对面的共识活动,全球用于在线问卷调查。

参与者

在乌干达举行的共识发展会议上召集了一个多学科专家小组,其中包括 21 名有领导挑战赛经验的研究人员、5 名公共卫生部门工作人员和 9 名乌干达最终用户。向之前使用众包方法的已发表文章的 140 位对应作者发送了在线调查。

结果

专家组的一个小组制定了最初的声明和调查。我们收到了 120 名(85.7%)调查参与者的回复,这些回复在所有 21 名小组成员的现场研讨会上进行了介绍。小组成员讨论了每个部分,修改了声明,并参与了第二轮问卷调查。根据第二轮调查结果,我们与研讨会参与者详细讨论了每个小节,并进一步修改了共识声明。然后,我们在 21 名专家小组成员中进行了第三轮问卷调查,并使用结果敲定了声明。这一迭代过程产生了 23 项最终声明项目,所有项目的共识度均超过 80%。声明项目组织成挑战赛的七个阶段,包括以下内容:考虑适当性、组织社区指导委员会、宣传挑战赛、评估贡献、表彰贡献者、分享想法和评估挑战赛(COPARSE)。

结论

众包专家和利益相关者在众包挑战赛的设计和实施方面高度一致。COPARSE 共识声明可用于组织众包挑战赛,提高众包研究的严谨性和可重复性,并实现大规模协作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4718/8573649/1c48ed71b5e5/bmjopen-2021-048699f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验