Guo Tingting, Su Jing, Hu Jiayi, Aalberg Marianne, Zhu Yinglin, Teng Teng, Zhou Xinyu
Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
The First Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 20;12:674267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.674267. eCollection 2021.
Anxiety disorder is the most prevalent mental disorder in children and adolescents. However, evidence for efficacy and acceptability between individual cognitive behavior therapy (I-CBT) and group cognitive behavior therapy (G-CBT) in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents remains unclear. Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and LILACS) were searched from inception to October 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing I-CBT with G-CBT for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents were included. The primary outcomes were efficacy (mean change in anxiety symptom scores) at post-treatment and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation). The secondary outcome was remission at post-treatment. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine whether the result would be influenced by age, number of treatment sessions, parental involvement, male/female sex, and number of participants. Nine studies were selected in this meta-analysis. The pooled analyses indicated no significant difference between I-CBT and G-CBT for efficacy at post-treatment [standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.37 to 0.09], acceptability [odds ratio (OR), 1.30; 95% CI, 0.61-2.77], and remission at post-treatment (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79-1.66). In the subgroup analysis of age, I-CBT was significantly more effective than G-CBT in adolescents at post-treatment (SMD, -0.77; 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.02), but not in children (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.20). However, the findings were not materially different from those of the efficacy subgroup analysis of number of treatment sessions, parental involvement, male/female sex, and number of participants. Based on those current evidence, I-CBT was shown to be more beneficial than G-CBT for anxiety disorders in adolescents, but not in children. However, further well-designed clinical studies should be performed to confirm these findings. http://osf.io/xrjkp, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XRJKP.
焦虑症是儿童和青少年中最普遍的精神障碍。然而,个体认知行为疗法(I-CBT)和团体认知行为疗法(G-CBT)在儿童和青少年焦虑症治疗中的疗效和可接受性证据仍不明确。检索了8个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO、ProQuest和LILACS),检索时间从建库至2019年10月。纳入了比较I-CBT和G-CBT治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为治疗后疗效(焦虑症状评分的平均变化)和可接受性(全因停药)。次要结局指标为治疗后缓解情况。还进行了亚组分析,以检验结果是否会受到年龄、治疗疗程数、家长参与情况、性别以及参与者数量的影响。本荟萃分析纳入了9项研究。汇总分析表明,I-CBT和G-CBT在治疗后疗效方面无显著差异[标准化均数差(SMD),-0.14;95%置信区间(CI),-0.37至0.09],在可接受性方面也无显著差异[比值比(OR),1.30;95%CI,0.61 - 2.77],治疗后缓解情况同样无显著差异(OR,1.15;95%CI,0.79 - 1.66)。在年龄亚组分析中,I-CBT在治疗后对青少年的疗效显著优于G-CBT(SMD,-0.77;95%CI,-1.51至-0.02),但对儿童则不然(SMD,0.00;95%CI,-0.02至0.20)。然而,这些结果与治疗疗程数、家长参与情况、性别以及参与者数量的疗效亚组分析结果并无实质性差异。基于目前的这些证据,I-CBT对青少年焦虑症的治疗效果显示比G-CBT更有益,但对儿童则不然。不过,仍需开展进一步精心设计的临床研究来证实这些发现。http://osf.io/xrjkp,标识符:10.17605/OSF.IO/XRJKP