Suppr超能文献

家长增强式认知行为疗法对青少年焦虑症的疗效如何?基于系统综述的纵向研究。

Do Parents Enhance Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Youth Anxiety? An Overview of Systematic Reviews Over Time.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Parenting and Family Support Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Sep;26(3):773-788. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00436-5. Epub 2023 May 22.

Abstract

The last 20 years has seen debate regarding the merits of involving parents in cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for youth anxiety played out across systematic reviews which have high impact. These reviews examined varying treatment formats in relation to parent involvement, including youth only CBT (Y-CBT), parent only CBT (P-CBT) and family CBT (youth and parent; F-CBT). This is a novel overview of systematic reviews examining evidence for parental involvement in CBT for youth anxiety over the period this was studied. Two independent coders systematically searched for studies in medical and psychological databases using the categories "Review", "Youth", "Anxiety", "Cognitive Behavior Therapy" and "Parent/Family". Of the 2,189 unique articles identified, there were 25 systematic reviews since 2005 which compared the effects of CBT for youth anxiety with varying parent involvement. Despite systematically studying the same phenomenon, the reviews were heterogeneous in outcome, design, inclusion criteria and often had methodological limitations. Of the 25 reviews, 21 found no difference between formats and 22 reviews were considered inconclusive. Yet while there were typically no statistical differences, consistent patterns in the direction of effects were detected over time. P-CBT was less effective than other formats, suggesting the importance of directly treating anxious youths. Early reviews favored F-CBT over Y-CBT, however, later reviews did not show this trend. We consider the effects of moderators including exposure therapy, long-term outcomes and the child's age. We consider how to manage heterogeneity in primary studies and reviews to better detect treatment differences where they exist.Trial registration This protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework: osf.io/2u58t.

摘要

过去 20 年来,有关在认知行为疗法 (CBT) 中让父母参与治疗青少年焦虑症的好处的争论,在具有高影响力的系统评价中不断展开。这些综述考察了不同的治疗模式与父母参与度的关系,包括仅青少年参与的 CBT(Y-CBT)、仅父母参与的 CBT(P-CBT)和家庭 CBT(青少年和父母;F-CBT)。这是对过去 20 年来系统评价中关于父母在青少年焦虑症 CBT 中的参与证据的全面综述。两位独立的编码员使用“综述”、“青少年”、“焦虑”、“认知行为疗法”和“父母/家庭”这几个类别,在医学和心理学数据库中系统地搜索研究。在确定的 2189 篇独特文章中,自 2005 年以来,有 25 篇系统评价比较了不同父母参与度的 CBT 对青少年焦虑症的疗效。尽管这些综述系统地研究了相同的现象,但在结果、设计、纳入标准方面存在异质性,且往往存在方法学上的局限性。在这 25 篇综述中,有 21 篇发现不同模式之间没有差异,22 篇被认为是不确定的。尽管通常没有统计学差异,但随着时间的推移,仍检测到了效应方向的一致模式。P-CBT 的效果不如其他模式,这表明直接治疗焦虑青少年的重要性。早期的综述倾向于 F-CBT 优于 Y-CBT,但后来的综述并没有显示出这种趋势。我们考虑了包括暴露疗法、长期结果和孩子年龄在内的调节因素的影响。我们考虑如何管理主要研究和综述中的异质性,以便在存在差异时更好地检测到治疗差异。试验注册 本方案在开放科学框架中注册:osf.io/2u58t。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04fb/10465628/f6e93bf19333/10567_2023_436_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验