Lee Si Hyung, Jung Sang Joon, Ohn Young-Hoon, Chang Jee Ho
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea; Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea; Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
J AAPOS. 2021 Dec;25(6):340.e1-340.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
To investigate the association between refractive error and horizontal strabismus based on a Korean population-based survey.
The study included 22,887 participants >5 years of age who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2008 to 2011. Refractive error was classified into myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia. The association between refractive error and exodeviation or esodeviation was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
After adjusting for potential confounders, the analyses revealed an increased odds ratio (OR) for exodeviation with an increasing trend according to the severity of myopia (mild myopia, OR = 1.36 [95% CI, 1.11-1.66]; moderate myopia, OR = 1.75 [95% CI, 1.36-2.26]; severe myopia, OR = 2.01 [95% CI, 1.50-2.69]; P < 0.001). Hyperopia was not associated with exodeviation (P = 0.273). There were also significant associations for exodeviation with astigmatism (OR = 1.36 [95% CI, 1.16-1.59; P < 0.001]) and anisometropia (OR = 1.78 [95% CI, 1.38-2.30; P < 0.001]) In comparison, esodeviation was significantly associated with hyperopia (OR, 10.24 [95% CI, 4.43-23.70; P < 0.001]) and anisometropia (OR, 5.16 [95% CI, 2.27-11.76; P < 0.001]), while no significant association was found with myopic degree (P = 0.170) or astigmatism (P = 0.816).
Refractive error was closely associated with exodeviation and esodeviation. These risk associations should be considered when managing refractive errors.
基于一项韩国人群调查,研究屈光不正与水平斜视之间的关联。
该研究纳入了2008年至2011年参加韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(KNHANES)的22887名5岁以上参与者。屈光不正分为近视、远视、散光和屈光参差。使用多因素逻辑回归分析评估屈光不正与外斜视或内斜视之间的关联。
在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,分析显示随着近视严重程度增加,外斜视的优势比(OR)升高且呈上升趋势(轻度近视,OR = 1.36 [95% CI,1.11 - 1.66];中度近视,OR = 1.75 [95% CI,1.36 - 2.26];重度近视,OR = 2.01 [95% CI,1.50 - 2.69];P < 0.001)。远视与外斜视无关联(P = 0.273)。外斜视与散光(OR = 1.36 [95% CI,1.16 - 1.59;P < 0.001])和屈光参差(OR = 1.78 [95% CI,1.38 - 2.30;P < 0.001])也存在显著关联。相比之下,内斜视与远视(OR,10.24 [95% CI,4.43 - 23.70;P < 0.001])和屈光参差(OR,5.16 [95% CI,2.27 - 11.76;P < 0.001])显著相关,而与近视度数(P = 0.170)或散光(P = 0.816)无显著关联。
屈光不正与外斜视和内斜视密切相关。在处理屈光不正时应考虑这些风险关联。