• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对水平性斜视的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析显示,在患病率方面没有差异,但在临床中存在对女性的性别偏见。

Gender differences in horizontal strabismus: Systematic review and meta-analysis shows no difference in prevalence, but gender bias towards females in the clinic.

机构信息

Center of Biomedical Research Excellence in Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA.

School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 1;13:04085. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04085.

DOI:10.7189/jogh.13.04085
PMID:37651634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10471156/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strabismus is a misalignment of the visual axis that affects 2-3% of the population and can lead to loss of binocular vision. It is currently controversial whether there is a gender difference in the most common form of visual misalignment: horizontal strabismus. Some studies claimed that more females than males have an outward deviation (exotropia), while others concluded that there is no significant gender difference. No previous work has systematically explored gender differences in horizontal strabismus or has compared the results of population-based studies with those of clinic-based studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of horizontal strabismus. We included 73 population-based studies and compared their disclosed gender population with that in 141 comparable clinical-based studies. We analysed the data according to gender, strabismus type (esotropia, exotropia), and geographic region/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Summary statistics showed a nearly identical prevalence of horizontal strabismus (2.558% for males, 2.582% for females), esotropia (1.386% males vs. 1.377% females), and of exotropia (1.035% males vs. 1.043% females). Meta-analysis results showed that these differences between males and females were not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97-1.10), but that females were significantly more frequent (by 7.50%) in clinic-based studies than males, with 5.00% more females for esotropia, and 12.20% more females for exotropia when adjusted for the population's sex ratio. The extent of the female gender bias differed between geographic regions/societies, with Asians having the lowest bias towards females and Latin American countries having the strongest bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Males and females have the same prevalence of horizontal strabismus, including exotropia. Females with strabismus seek health care or are brought to clinics significantly more often than males. This is an example of gender bias in health care in favour of females rather than males, apparently because parents - erroneously fearing only cosmetic consequences - are more concerned about strabismus in their daughters than their sons. Societal attitudes towards females, as well as economic factors (insurance status), appear to be relevant factors that determine the magnitude of the gender bias in horizontal strabismus.

摘要

背景

斜视是一种眼球视轴的错位,影响了 2-3%的人群,并可能导致双眼视觉丧失。目前,关于最常见的视觉错位形式(水平斜视)是否存在性别差异存在争议。一些研究声称,女性中出现外斜视(外斜视)的比例高于男性,而另一些研究则得出结论,性别差异不显著。以前没有研究系统地探讨水平斜视中的性别差异,也没有将基于人群的研究结果与基于临床的研究结果进行比较。

方法

我们对报告水平斜视患病率的研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。我们纳入了 73 项基于人群的研究,并将其报告的性别人群与 141 项基于临床的可比研究进行了比较。我们根据性别、斜视类型(内斜视、外斜视)和地理位置/种族进行了数据分析。

结果

汇总统计数据显示,男性和女性的水平斜视患病率(男性 2.558%,女性 2.582%)、内斜视(男性 1.386%,女性 1.377%)和外斜视(男性 1.035%,女性 1.043%)几乎相同。荟萃分析结果表明,男性和女性之间的这些差异没有统计学意义(比值比(OR)=1.01;95%置信区间(CI)=0.97-1.10),但女性在基于临床的研究中比男性更常见,调整人口性别比例后,内斜视的女性多 5.00%,外斜视的女性多 12.20%。亚洲的性别偏见程度最低,而拉丁美洲国家的性别偏见程度最高。

结论

男性和女性的水平斜视患病率相同,包括外斜视。有斜视的女性比男性更频繁地寻求医疗保健或被带到诊所。这是医疗保健中有利于女性而不是男性的性别偏见的一个例子,显然是因为父母错误地只担心美容后果,对外斜视比儿子更担心女儿。社会对女性的态度以及经济因素(保险状况)似乎是决定水平斜视性别偏见程度的相关因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/4cc3de752a40/jogh-13-04085-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/f153fbc97b49/jogh-13-04085-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/a4b64c6be2a2/jogh-13-04085-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/723e71459917/jogh-13-04085-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/355227c582b1/jogh-13-04085-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/4cc3de752a40/jogh-13-04085-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/f153fbc97b49/jogh-13-04085-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/a4b64c6be2a2/jogh-13-04085-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/723e71459917/jogh-13-04085-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/355227c582b1/jogh-13-04085-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ce/10471156/4cc3de752a40/jogh-13-04085-F5.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in horizontal strabismus: Systematic review and meta-analysis shows no difference in prevalence, but gender bias towards females in the clinic.性别对水平性斜视的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析显示,在患病率方面没有差异,但在临床中存在对女性的性别偏见。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 1;13:04085. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04085.
2
Prevalence and types of strabismus in cerebral palsy: A global and historical perspective based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.脑瘫患者斜视的患病率及类型:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的全球及历史视角
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 24:2024.01.23.24301684. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.23.24301684.
3
Prevalence and Types of Strabismus in Cerebral Palsy: A Global and Historical Perspective Based on a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑瘫患者斜视的患病率及类型:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的全球及历史视角
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;32(2):125-142. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2024.2331537. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Pattern Strabismus in a Tertiary Hospital in Southern China: A Retrospective Review.中国南方一家三级医院的斜视模式:回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 29;58(8):1018. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081018.
5
Is There Gender Bias in Perceptions of Strabismus Among Adults?成人斜视感知中是否存在性别偏见?
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023 Nov-Dec;60(6):396-401. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20221025-01. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
Binocular visual field in adults with horizontal strabismus and driving requirements.成人水平斜视和驾驶要求的双眼视野。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Aug;37(11):2220-2225. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02319-5. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Global and regional prevalence of strabismus: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.斜视的全球及区域患病率:一项全面的系统评价与荟萃分析
Strabismus. 2019 Jun;27(2):54-65. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1604773. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Changing patterns of strabismus: a decade of experience in Hong Kong.斜视模式的变化:香港十年经验
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;86(8):854-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.8.854.
9
Sensory strabismus--eso or exo?感觉性斜视——内斜视还是外斜视?
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2001 Nov-Dec;38(6):327-30; quiz 354-5. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20011101-05.
10
Strabismus and amblyopia in Africa - a systematic review and meta-analysis.非洲的斜视与弱视——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Strabismus. 2023 Mar;31(1):31-44. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2022.2157023. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Strabismus Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 2269 Cases from a Single Center.斜视手术效果分析:来自单一中心的2269例回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 21;31:e947601. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947601.
2
Prevalence and Etiology of Strabismus in Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Ethnic Differences in the Esotropia/Exotropia Ratio.唐氏综合征斜视的患病率及病因:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,重点关注内斜视/外斜视比例的种族差异
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 3:1-19. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2500018.
3
Mediation Effect of Resilience Between Social Support and Depression Symptoms in Patients With Strabismus: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Spectrum of ophthalmic diseases in children hospitalized in a tertiary ophthalmology hospital in China from 2010 to 2019.2010 年至 2019 年中国一家三级眼科医院住院儿童眼科疾病谱。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02533-5.
2
A retrospective study of strabismus surgery in a tertiary eye hospital in the Chaoshan area in China from 2014 to 2020.一项回顾性研究,分析了 2014 年至 2020 年期间中国潮汕地区一家三级眼科医院的斜视手术情况。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02479-8.
3
Non-ocular risk factors in Turkish children with strabismus and amblyopia.
斜视患者中复原力在社会支持与抑郁症状之间的中介作用:一项横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jan 29;18:459-468. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S504960. eCollection 2025.
4
Translation, Evaluation and Validation of the Adult Strabismus -20 (AS-20) Questionnaire in Swedish.成人斜视-20(AS-20)问卷的瑞典语翻译、评估与验证
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 7;18:3615-3625. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S477032. eCollection 2024.
5
Prevalence and etiology of strabismus in Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on ethnic differences in the esotropia/exotropia ratio.唐氏综合征患者斜视的患病率及病因:一项系统评价与荟萃分析,重点关注内斜视/外斜视比例的种族差异。
medRxiv. 2024 Nov 29:2024.11.28.24318156. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.28.24318156.
6
Prevalence of strabismus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.巴基斯坦斜视的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Strabismus. 2025 Mar;33(1):44-53. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2408416. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
7
Understanding parental hurdles in accessing strabismus treatment.了解家长在获得斜视治疗方面所面临的障碍。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024 Aug 19;4(4):189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.08.004. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
8
Plication or resection combined with antagonist recession in horizontal strabismus.水平斜视中折叠术或切除术联合拮抗肌后徙术
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 14;13(2):82-87. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1498. eCollection 2024 Summer.
9
Prevalence and Types of Strabismus in Cerebral Palsy: A Global and Historical Perspective Based on a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑瘫患者斜视的患病率及类型:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的全球及历史视角
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;32(2):125-142. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2024.2331537. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
10
Prevalence and types of strabismus in cerebral palsy: A global and historical perspective based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.脑瘫患者斜视的患病率及类型:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的全球及历史视角
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 24:2024.01.23.24301684. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.23.24301684.
土耳其斜视和弱视儿童的非眼部风险因素。
Turk J Pediatr. 2022;64(2):341-349. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2021.204.
4
A systemic review of barriers to accessing paediatric eye care services in African countries.一项关于非洲国家获取儿科眼科保健服务障碍的系统综述。
Afr Health Sci. 2021 Dec;21(4):1887-1897. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i4.47.
5
Strabismus outcomes after surgery: the nationwide SOS France study.斜视手术后的结果:全国 SOS France 研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;260(6):2037-2043. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05541-1. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
6
Characteristics and long-term surgical outcomes of horizontal strabismus.水平斜视的特征和长期手术结果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 May;42(5):1639-1649. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02159-4. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
7
Association between refractive errors and horizontal strabismus: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.屈光不正与水平斜视之间的关联:韩国国家健康与营养检查调查
J AAPOS. 2021 Dec;25(6):340.e1-340.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
8
Prevalence of strabismus among preschool children in eastern China and comparison at a 5-year interval: a population-based cross-sectional study.中国东部学龄前儿童斜视患病率及 5 年随访比较:基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 19;11(10):e055112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055112.
9
Prevalence of pediatric eye disease in the optumlabs data warehouse.Optumlabs 数据仓库中儿科眼病的患病率。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;29(5):537-544. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1971261. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
10
Geographic Variation in Strabismus Pattern Among Pediatric Age Group in Lebanon: A Single-Centre Five-Year Observational Study.黎巴嫩儿童年龄组斜视模式的地理差异:一项单中心五年观察性研究
Cureus. 2021 Jun 27;13(6):e15957. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15957. eCollection 2021 Jun.