Genovez-Júnior Guilherme, Berger Sandrine Bittencourt, Dos Santos Lucineide Lima, Paloco Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse, Lopes Murilo Baena, Giuliangeli Débora Fernandes, Dos Santos Júlia Graciela Monteiro, Guiraldo Ricardo Danil
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Pitagoras UNOPAR, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 31;2021:7025910. doi: 10.1155/2021/7025910. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the microhardness of tooth enamel remineralized with enamel matrix protein solution as well as the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to this surface.
In total, 24 human premolars were selected and divided into 3 experimental groups ( = 8): SE-sound enamel, DE-demineralized enamel, and TE-demineralized enamel treated with amelogenin solution. Samples from DE and TE groups were subjected to pH cycling to induce initial artificial caries lesion. TE group was treated with amelogenin solution. Samples were placed in artificial saliva for 7 days. Knoop microhardness was measured before any intervention (0), after pH cycling (1) and after amelogenin solution treatment application (2). Twenty-four hours after ceramic orthodontic brackets were bonded, samples were subjected to shear test in a universal testing machine. Microhardness and shear measurement distributions were subjected to Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, which was followed by parametric tests ( = 0.05): 2-way analysis of variance (factors: enamel condition × treatment) and Tukey posttest for all three groups (SE, DE, and TE) in 0 and 2 for microhardness; analysis of variance and Tukey's test, for shear bond strength test.
Means recorded for Knoop microhardness in 2, for the SE (366.7 KHN) and TE (342.8 KHN) groups, were significantly higher than those recorded for the DE group (263.5 KHN). The shear bond strength of the SE (15.44 MPa) and TE (14.84 MPa) groups statistically differed from that of the DE group (11.95 MPa).
In vitro demineralized enamel treatment with amelogenin solution was capable of taking samples' hardness back to levels similar to those observed for sound enamel. The shear bond strength on the enamel subjected to this treatment was similar to that observed for healthy enamel and higher than that observed for demineralized enamel.
评估用釉基质蛋白溶液再矿化的牙釉质的显微硬度以及正畸托槽与该表面粘结的剪切粘结强度。
共选取24颗人类前磨牙,分为3个实验组(每组8颗):SE组——健康釉质组,DE组——脱矿釉质组,TE组——用釉原蛋白溶液处理的脱矿釉质组。对DE组和TE组的样本进行pH循环处理以诱导初始人工龋损。TE组用釉原蛋白溶液处理。将样本置于人工唾液中7天。在任何干预前(0)、pH循环后(1)以及应用釉原蛋白溶液处理后(2)测量努氏显微硬度。在粘结陶瓷正畸托槽24小时后,在万能试验机上对样本进行剪切测试。对显微硬度和剪切测量分布进行柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫正态性检验,随后进行参数检验(α = 0.05):对所有三组(SE组、DE组和TE组)在0和2时的显微硬度进行双向方差分析(因素:釉质状况×处理)和Tukey事后检验;对剪切粘结强度测试进行方差分析和Tukey检验。
SE组(366.7 KHN)和TE组(342.8 KHN)在2时记录的努氏显微硬度平均值显著高于DE组(263.5 KHN)。SE组(15.44 MPa)和TE组(14.84 MPa)的剪切粘结强度在统计学上与DE组(11.95 MPa)不同。
用釉原蛋白溶液对体外脱矿釉质进行处理能够使样本硬度恢复到与健康釉质相似的水平。经过这种处理的釉质上的剪切粘结强度与健康釉质相似,且高于脱矿釉质。