Wan Jian, Liu Chang, Yuan Xiao-Qi, Yang Mu-Qing, Wu Xiao-Cai, Gao Ren-Yuan, Yin Lu, Chen Chun-Qiu
Center for Difficult and Complicated Abdominal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.
Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Oct 27;13(10):1190-1201. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i10.1190.
Along with the unceasing progress of medicine, Crohn's disease (CD), especially complex CD, is no longer a taboo for minimally invasive surgery. However, considering its special disease characteristics, more clinical trials are needed to confirm the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for CD.
To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic enterectomy for CD, assess the advantages of laparoscopy over laparotomy in patients with CD, and discuss comprehensive minimally invasive surgical techniques in complex CD.
This study prospectively collected clinical data from patients with CD who underwent enterectomy from January 2017 to January 2020. It was registered in the Chinese clinical trial database with the registration number ChiCTR-INR-16009321. Patients were divided into a laparoscopy group and a traditional laparotomy group according to the surgical method. The baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, temporary stoma, levels of abdominal adhesion, pathological characteristics, days to flatus and soft diet, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, readmission rate within 30 d, and hospitalization cost were compared between the two groups.
A total of 120 eligible patients were enrolled into the pre-standardized groups, including 100 in the laparoscopy group and 20 in the laparotomy group. Compared with the laparotomy group, the postoperative hospitalization time in the laparoscopy group was shorter (9.1 ± 3.9 d 11.0 ± 1.6 d, < 0.05), the days to flatus were fewer (2.8 ± 0.8 d 3.5 ± 0.7 d, < 0.05), the days to soft diet were fewer (4.2 ± 2.4 d 6.2 ± 2.0 d, < 0.05) and the intraoperative blood loss was less (103.3 ± 80.42 mL 169.5 ± 100.42 mL, < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative clinical data, operation time (149.0 ± 43.8 min 159.2 ± 40.0 min), stoma rate, levels of abdominal adhesion, total cost of hospitalization, incidence of postoperative complications [8.0% (8/100) 15.0% (3/20)], or readmission rate within 30 days [1.0% (1/100) 0.00 (0/20)].
Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic enterectomy promotes the recovery of gastrointestinal function, shortens the postoperative hospitalization time, and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Laparoscopic enterectomy combined with varieties of minimally invasive surgical techniques is a safe and acceptable therapeutic method for CD patients with enteric fistulas.
随着医学的不断进步,克罗恩病(CD),尤其是复杂性CD,已不再是微创手术的禁忌证。然而,鉴于其特殊的疾病特征,仍需要更多的临床试验来证实腹腔镜手术治疗CD的安全性和可行性。
探讨腹腔镜肠切除术治疗CD的安全性和可行性,评估腹腔镜手术相对于开腹手术治疗CD患者的优势,并讨论复杂性CD的综合微创手术技术。
本研究前瞻性收集了2017年1月至2020年1月期间接受肠切除术的CD患者的临床资料。该研究已在中国临床试验数据库注册,注册号为ChiCTR-INR-16009321。根据手术方式将患者分为腹腔镜组和传统开腹组。比较两组患者的基线特征、手术时间、术中出血量、临时造口、腹腔粘连程度、病理特征、排气和恢复软食时间、术后并发症、住院时间、30天内再入院率及住院费用。
共有120例符合纳入标准的患者被纳入预标准化组,其中腹腔镜组100例,开腹组20例。与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组术后住院时间较短(9.1±3.9天 vs 11.0±1.6天,P<0.05),排气时间较少(2.8±0.8天 vs 3.5±0.7天,P<0.05),恢复软食时间较少(4.2±2.4天 vs 6.2±2.0天,P<0.05),术中出血量较少(103.3±80.42 ml vs 169.5±100.42 ml,P<0.05)。两组患者术前临床资料、手术时间(149.0±43.8分钟 vs 159.2±40.0分钟)、造口率、腹腔粘连程度、住院总费用、术后并发症发生率[8.0%(8/100) vs 15.0%(3/20)]或30天内再入院率[1.0%(1/100) vs 0.00(0/20)]比较,差异均无统计学意义。
与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜肠切除术可促进胃肠功能恢复,缩短术后住院时间,且不增加术后并发症发生率。腹腔镜肠切除术联合多种微创手术技术是治疗合并肠瘘的CD患者的一种安全且可接受的治疗方法。