Suppr超能文献

评估近期射血分数降低的心力衰竭退伍军人的护理质量。

Evaluation of Quality of Care for US Veterans With Recent-Onset Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):130-139. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4585.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Multiple guideline-recommended therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are available and promoted by performance measures. However, contemporary data on the use of these therapies are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends in guideline-directed medical therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use, and risk-adjusted mortality among patients with recent-onset HFrEF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed claims and electronic health record data of patients with recent-onset HFrEF diagnosed at US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system facilities from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2019. Veterans who had a history of heart transplant or used a ventricular assist device were among the patients who were excluded.

EXPOSURES

Guideline-directed medical therapy (any β-blocker, guideline-recommended β-blocker [bisoprolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol succinate], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and hydralazine plus nitrate) and ICD.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Treatment rates for guideline-directed medical therapies and ICDs were calculated within 6 months of the index HFrEF date using medication fills, procedural codes for implantation and monitoring, and diagnosis codes. Risk-adjusted mortality was calculated after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. For both treatment rates and risk-adjusted mortality, we evaluated the change over 3 periods (period 1: July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015; period 2: July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017; and period 3: July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019) and variation across VA facilities.

RESULTS

The final cohort comprised 144 074 eligible patients with incident HFrEF that was diagnosed between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2019. The cohort had a mean (SD) age of 71.0 (11.4) years and was mostly composed of men (140 765 [97.7%]). Overall, changes in medical therapy rates were minimal over time, with the use of a guideline-recommended β-blocker increasing from 64.2% in 2013 to 72.0% in 2019. Rates for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy increased from 23.9% in 2013 to 26.9% in 2019, and rates for hydralazine plus nitrate therapy remained stable at 24.2% over the study period. Rates for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy increased since its introduction in 2015 but only to 22.6% in 2019. Among patients with an ICD indication, early use rates decreased over time. Substantial variation in medical therapy rates persisted across VA facilities. Risk-adjusted mortality decreased over the study period from 19.9% (95% CI, 19.6%-20.2%) in July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015, to 18.4% (95% CI, 18.0%-18.7%) in July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019 (OR, 0.96 per additional year; 95% CI, 0.96-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found only marginal improvement between 2013 and 2019 in the guideline-recommended therapy and mortality rates among patients with recent-onset HFrEF. New approaches to increase the uptake of evidence-based HFrEF treatment are urgently needed and could lead to larger reductions in mortality.

摘要

重要性

有多种指南推荐的治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的方法,并且这些方法都受到绩效措施的推广。然而,目前关于这些治疗方法的使用情况的数据有限。

目的

评估近期诊断为 HFrEF 的患者中指南指导的药物治疗、植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)使用以及风险调整后死亡率的趋势。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究分析了 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间,美国退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统设施中最近诊断为 HFrEF 的患者的索赔和电子健康记录数据。排除了有心脏移植史或使用心室辅助装置的患者。

暴露因素

指南指导的药物治疗(任何β受体阻滞剂、指南推荐的β受体阻滞剂[比索洛尔、卡维地洛或琥珀酸美托洛尔]、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂和肼屈嗪加硝酸盐)和 ICD。

主要结果和措施

在索引 HFrEF 日期后的 6 个月内,使用药物填充、植入和监测的程序代码以及诊断代码计算指南指导的药物治疗和 ICD 的治疗率。在调整了基线患者特征后,计算了风险调整后的死亡率。对于治疗率和风险调整后的死亡率,我们评估了三个时期(时期 1:2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日;时期 2:2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日;时期 3:2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日)的变化以及 VA 设施之间的差异。

结果

最终队列包括 144074 名符合条件的近期诊断为 HFrEF 的患者,这些患者的诊断时间在 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日之间。该队列的平均(SD)年龄为 71.0(11.4)岁,主要由男性(140765 [97.7%])组成。总体而言,随着时间的推移,药物治疗率的变化很小,指南推荐的β受体阻滞剂的使用率从 2013 年的 64.2%增加到 2019 年的 72.0%。醛固酮受体拮抗剂治疗的使用率从 2013 年的 23.9%增加到 2019 年的 26.9%,而肼屈嗪加硝酸盐治疗的使用率在研究期间保持稳定在 24.2%。自 2015 年引入血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂以来,其使用率有所增加,但到 2019 年仅增加到 22.6%。在有 ICD 适应证的患者中,早期使用率随时间下降。VA 设施之间的药物治疗率差异仍然很大。在研究期间,风险调整后的死亡率从 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日的 19.9%(95%CI,19.6%-20.2%)下降到 2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日的 18.4%(95%CI,18.0%-18.7%)(OR,每增加 1 年,为 0.96;95%CI,0.96-0.97)。

结论和相关性

本研究发现,在最近诊断为 HFrEF 的患者中,从 2013 年到 2019 年,指南推荐的治疗和死亡率的改善仅略有改善。迫切需要采取新的方法来增加对 HFrEF 治疗的循证方法的采用,这可能会导致死亡率的更大降低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验