• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居住老年人连续跌倒风险评分的制定和验证:一种生态方法。

Development and validation of a continuous fall risk score in community-dwelling older people: an ecological approach.

机构信息

Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Évora, Largo dos Colegiais 2, Évora, Portugal.

Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, Largo dos Colegiais 2, Évora, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 10;21(Suppl 2):808. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10813-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10813-w
PMID:34758784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8582091/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fall risk assessment in older people is of major importance for providing adequate preventive measures. Current predictive models are mainly focused on intrinsic risk factors and do not adjust for contextual exposure. The validity and utility of continuous risk scores have already been demonstrated in clinical practice in several diseases. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an intrinsic-exposure continuous fall risk score (cFRs) for community-dwelling older people through standardized residuals.

METHODS

Self-reported falls in the last year were recorded from 504 older persons (391 women: age 73.1 ± 6.5 years; 113 men: age 74.0 ± 6.1 years). Participants were categorized as occasional fallers (falls ≤1) or recurrent fallers (≥ 2 falls). The cFRs was derived for each participant by summing the standardized residuals (Z-scores) of the intrinsic fall risk factors and exposure factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the accuracy of the cFRs for identifying recurrent fallers.

RESULTS

The cFRs varied according to the number of reported falls; it was lowest in the group with no falls (- 1.66 ± 2.59), higher in the group with one fall (0.05 ± 3.13, p < 0.001), and highest in the group with recurrent fallers (2.82 ± 3.94, p < 0.001). The cFRs cutoff level yielding the maximal sensitivity and specificity for identifying recurrent fallers was 1.14, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.790 (95% confidence interval: 0.746-0.833; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The cFRs was shown to be a valid dynamic multifactorial fall risk assessment tool for epidemiological analyses and clinical practice. Moreover, the potential for the cFRs to become a widely used approach regarding fall prevention in community-dwelling older people was demonstrated, since it involves a holistic intrinsic-exposure approach to the phenomena. Further investigation is required to validate the cFRs with other samples since it is a sample-specific tool.

摘要

背景

老年人的跌倒风险评估对于提供充分的预防措施非常重要。目前的预测模型主要关注内在风险因素,而不调整环境暴露因素。在许多疾病的临床实践中,连续风险评分的有效性和实用性已经得到了证明。本研究旨在通过标准化残差为社区居住的老年人开发和验证内在-暴露连续跌倒风险评分(cFRs)。

方法

从 504 名老年人(391 名女性:年龄 73.1 ± 6.5 岁;113 名男性:年龄 74.0 ± 6.1 岁)中记录了过去一年的自我报告跌倒事件。参与者被分为偶发性跌倒者(跌倒次数≤1)或复发性跌倒者(≥2 次跌倒)。为每个参与者推导 cFRs,方法是将内在跌倒风险因素和暴露因素的标准化残差(Z 分数)相加。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)分析确定 cFRs 识别复发性跌倒者的准确性。

结果

cFRs 随报告跌倒次数而变化;无跌倒者的 cFRs 最低(-1.66 ± 2.59),有一次跌倒者的 cFRs 较高(0.05 ± 3.13,p < 0.001),有复发性跌倒者的 cFRs 最高(2.82 ± 3.94,p < 0.001)。用于识别复发性跌倒者的 cFRs 截断值为 1.14,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.790(95%置信区间:0.746-0.833;p < 0.001)。

结论

cFRs 是一种有效的、动态的多因素跌倒风险评估工具,可用于流行病学分析和临床实践。此外,cFRs 有潜力成为社区居住老年人跌倒预防的一种广泛应用的方法,因为它涉及到对现象的整体内在-暴露方法。需要进一步的研究来验证 cFRs 在其他样本中的有效性,因为它是一种针对特定样本的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/46a0bf7157aa/12889_2021_10813_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/10e4f11fc072/12889_2021_10813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/20b044caea14/12889_2021_10813_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/46a0bf7157aa/12889_2021_10813_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/10e4f11fc072/12889_2021_10813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/20b044caea14/12889_2021_10813_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f94/8582091/46a0bf7157aa/12889_2021_10813_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a continuous fall risk score in community-dwelling older people: an ecological approach.社区居住老年人连续跌倒风险评分的制定和验证:一种生态方法。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 10;21(Suppl 2):808. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10813-w.
2
Development and validation of a robotic multifactorial fall-risk predictive model: A one-year prospective study in community-dwelling older adults.开发和验证一种机器人多因素跌倒风险预测模型:一项针对社区居住的老年人群体的为期一年的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0234904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234904. eCollection 2020.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.社区居住老年人预防跌倒的心理和教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 3;10(10):CD013480. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.
5
A Mobile App (FallSA) to Identify Fall Risk Among Malaysian Community-Dwelling Older Persons: Development and Validation Study.一款可识别马来西亚社区居住老年人跌倒风险的移动应用程序(FallSA):开发与验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 12;9(10):e23663. doi: 10.2196/23663.
6
A modified fall risk assessment tool that is specific to physical function predicts falls in community-dwelling elderly people.一种针对身体功能的改良跌倒风险评估工具可预测社区居住老年人的跌倒情况。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2014 Oct-Dec;37(4):159-65. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e3182abe7cb.
7
Validation of the LASA fall risk profile for recurrent falling in older recent fallers.验证 LASA 跌倒风险评估工具在老年近期跌倒者复发性跌倒中的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
8
Evaluating the discriminatory power of the velocity field diagram and timed-up-and-go test in determining the fall status of community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional observational study.评估速度场图和计时起立行走测试在确定社区居住老年人跌倒状态方面的区分能力:一项横断面观察性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03282-2.
9
Incidence and multidimensional predictors of occasional and recurrent falls among Malaysian community-dwelling older persons.马来西亚社区居住老年人偶发性和复发性跌倒的发生率及多维预测因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02103-2.
10
Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人跌倒及跌倒相关伤害的预防:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(2):1-78. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Fall Risk Assessment Scale for patients in rehabilitation hospitals: A methodological study.康复医院患者跌倒风险评估量表的研制与验证:一项方法学研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;7(11):e70040. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70040. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
A novel score for predicting falls in community-dwelling older people: a derivation and validation study.一种用于预测社区居住老年人跌倒的新型评分:推导和验证研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05064-4.
3
Validation and Improvement of the Saga Fall Risk Model: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Stepping-forward affordance perception test cut-offs: Red-flags to identify community-dwelling older adults at high risk of falling and of recurrent falling.向前迈步可及性感知测试截断值:识别社区居住的高龄老年人有高跌倒风险和反复跌倒风险的预警信号。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0239837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239837. eCollection 2020.
2
Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults.社区居住老年人跌倒风险评估中向前迈步可及性知觉测试的信度和结构有效性。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0225118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225118. eCollection 2019.
3
验证和改进 Saga 跌倒风险模型:一项多中心回顾性观察研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Feb 7;19:175-188. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S441235. eCollection 2024.
Understanding carers' fall concern and their management of fall risk among older people at home.
了解照顾者对家中老年人跌倒的担忧及其对跌倒风险的管理。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 24;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1162-7.
4
A Comparison of Multilevel Imputation Schemes for Random Coefficient Models: Fully Conditional Specification and Joint Model Imputation with Random Covariance Matrices.多水平随机系数模型插补方案的比较:完全条件化指定和带有随机协方差矩阵的联合模型插补。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):695-713. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1477040. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Novel sensing technology in fall risk assessment in older adults: a systematic review.新型感知技术在老年人跌倒风险评估中的应用:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0706-6.
6
Conceptualizing a Dynamic Fall Risk Model Including Intrinsic Risks and Exposures.概念化一个包含内在风险和暴露因素的动态跌倒风险模型。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):921-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Older people's experiences of falling and perceived risk of falls in the community: A narrative synthesis of qualitative research.老年人在社区中的跌倒经历及感知到的跌倒风险:定性研究的叙事综合分析
Int J Older People Nurs. 2017 Dec;12(4). doi: 10.1111/opn.12151. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Falls, Cognitive Impairment, and Gait Performance: Results From the GOOD Initiative.跌倒、认知障碍与步态表现:GOOD计划的结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):335-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Predictive Performance of a Fall Risk Assessment Tool for Community-Dwelling Older People (FRAT-up) in 4 European Cohorts.一种针对社区居住老年人的跌倒风险评估工具(FRAT-up)在4个欧洲队列中的预测性能。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1106-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
10
Diabetes mellitus and risk of falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病与老年人跌倒风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Age Ageing. 2016 Nov;45(6):761-767. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw140. Epub 2016 Aug 11.