Xi Yiheng, Zhou Li, Wang Ying
Department of Labor and Human Relations, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Solvay Business School, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 26;12:631748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631748. eCollection 2021.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has sparked a major global crisis that has infected public social mentality. Drawing on the concept of peace of mind (PoM), a culture-specific positive emotion construct developed in the Chinese cultural context, this study explored the ways to build a positive public social mentality in the time of the pandemic. PoM is indicative of a calm and stable emotional state marked by self-control and spiritual cultivation and is believed to align with the perceptions of subjective well-being in Chinese or eastern cultures. A three-wave cross-lag study using an online questionnaire survey was conducted on 107 employees in Chinese enterprises during the pandemic. The research findings suggest that social support had a significant positive time-cross effect on later PoM, i.e., social support-T1 had a significant predictive effect on PoM-T2 (β = 0.16, SE = 0.09, < 0.05) and social support-T2 had a significant predictive effect on PoM-T3 (β = 0.38, SE = 0.19, < 0.05), whereas PoM failed to show a positive time-cross effect on later social support, i.e., the predictive effects of PoM-T1 on social support-T2 (β = 0.04, SE = 0.07, > 0.05) and of PoM-T2 on social support-T3 (β = 0.13, SE = 0.09, > 0.05) were not significant. This study provided a dynamic picture of the construction of public social mentality in the time of public health emergencies and also contributed to the research on PoM antecedents.
持续的新冠疫情引发了一场重大的全球危机,影响了公众的社会心态。本研究借鉴“安心”这一在中国文化背景下发展起来的特定文化的积极情绪概念,探讨了在疫情期间构建积极公众社会心态的方法。安心表现为一种以自我控制和精神修养为特征的平静稳定的情绪状态,被认为与中国或东方文化中主观幸福感的认知相契合。在疫情期间,对中国企业的107名员工进行了一项使用在线问卷调查的三波交叉滞后研究。研究结果表明,社会支持对后期的安心有显著的正向时间交叉效应,即社会支持-T1对安心-T2有显著的预测作用(β = 0.16,SE = 0.09,< 0.05),社会支持-T2对安心-T3有显著的预测作用(β = 0.38,SE = 0.19,< 0.05),而安心对后期的社会支持没有正向时间交叉效应,即安心-T1对社会支持-T2的预测作用(β = 0.04,SE = 0.07,> 0.05)和安心-T2对社会支持-T3的预测作用(β = 0.13,SE = 0.09,> 0.05)不显著。本研究描绘了公共卫生紧急情况下公众社会心态构建的动态图景,也为安心的前因研究做出了贡献。