Upfill-Brown Alex, Hwang Richard, Clarkson Sam, Brodke Dane, Devana Sai, Mayer Erik, Kelley Benjamin, Arshi Armin, Lee Christopher
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
OTA Int. 2021 Nov 3;4(4):e158. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000158. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Tibial shaft fractures are a relatively common injury in orthopaedic surgery, with management options including intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plate osteosynthesis. Using a large national database, we sought to compare the prevalence and timing of short-term complications following either IMN or ORIF for tibial shaft fractures.
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients undergoing IMN or ORIF for the treatment of tibial shaft fracture between 2012 and 2018. Multivariate Poisson hurdle regression models were utilized to determine predictors of postoperative complications as well as the timing of postoperative complications.
A total of 4963 tibial shaft fracture were identified, with 3601 patients undergoing IMN (72.6%) and 1362 undergoing ORIF (27.4%). Patients undergoing IMN had a lower mean age of 48.8 compared with 53.9 for plate osteosynthesis ( < .001). IMN patients were also more likely to be male (53.5%) compared with ORIF patients (44.2%, < .001). In multivariate analysis, ORIF patients were significantly more likely to experience surgical site complications, including dehiscence, superficial, and deep infections (OR 2.04, = .003). There was no difference in probability of VTE between constructs; however, patients who underwent ORIF were diagnosed with VTE earlier than those who underwent IMN (relative rate 0.50, < .001). There was no difference between ORIF and IMN with regard to probability or timing of subsequent blood transfusion, major complications, or return to the operating room. Many patient factors, such as higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, congestive heart failure, and hypertension, were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.
Postoperative complications within 30 days are common after the surgical treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The risk of developing specific complications and the timing of these complications vary depending on numerous factors, including potentially modifiable risk factors such as the method of fixation or operative time, as well as nonmodifiable risk factors such as medical comorbidities.
胫骨干骨折是骨科手术中较为常见的损伤,治疗选择包括髓内钉(IMN)固定或钢板接骨术切开复位内固定(ORIF)。我们利用一个大型国家数据库,比较IMN或ORIF治疗胫骨干骨折后短期并发症的发生率和发生时间。
使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划来识别2012年至2018年间接受IMN或ORIF治疗胫骨干骨折的患者。采用多变量泊松障碍回归模型来确定术后并发症的预测因素以及术后并发症的发生时间。
共识别出4963例胫骨干骨折患者,其中3601例接受IMN治疗(72.6%),1362例接受ORIF治疗(27.4%)。接受IMN治疗的患者平均年龄较低,为48.8岁,而钢板接骨术患者为53.9岁(<0.001)。IMN患者男性比例也更高(53.5%),而ORIF患者为44.2%(<0.001)。在多变量分析中,ORIF患者发生手术部位并发症的可能性显著更高,包括切口裂开、浅表和深部感染(比值比2.04,P=0.003)。两种固定方式下发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的概率没有差异;然而,接受ORIF治疗的患者比接受IMN治疗的患者更早被诊断为VTE(相对率0.50,<0.001)。在后续输血概率、主要并发症或返回手术室方面,ORIF和IMN之间没有差异。许多患者因素,如美国麻醉医师协会评分较高、充血性心力衰竭和高血压,与术后并发症风险增加独立相关。
胫骨干骨折手术治疗后30天内的术后并发症很常见。发生特定并发症的风险及其发生时间因多种因素而异,包括潜在可改变的风险因素,如固定方法或手术时间,以及不可改变的风险因素,如内科合并症。