Suppr超能文献

测定血液α1抗胰蛋白酶水平的方法:一项系统评价

Methodologies for the Determination of Blood Alpha1 Antitrypsin Levels: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ruiz-Duque Borja, Bañuls Lucía, Reinoso-Arija Rocio, Carrasco-Hernandez Laura, Caballero-Eraso Candelaria, Dasí Francisco, Lopez-Campos José Luis

机构信息

Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain.

Departamento de Fisiología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 31;10(21):5132. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215132.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study of hematic concentrations of alpha1 antitrypsin (AAT) is currently one step in the diagnosis of AAT deficiency. To try to clarify the relevance of the laboratory techniques, we carried out a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the quantification of AAT in peripheral blood were searched in PubMed in July 2021. The selection criteria included (1) any type of study design that included a quantification of AAT in peripheral blood; (2) studies written in English or Spanish; (3) studies evaluating human beings; and (4) studies involving adults.

RESULTS

Out of 207 studies, the most frequently used techniques were nephelometry (43.9%), followed by ELISA (19.8%) and turbidimetry (13.5%). Altogether, 182 (87.9%) cases expressed their results in units of gram, while 16 (7.7%) articles expressed them in units of mole. Only 2.9% articles referred to the standard used, 43.5% articles indicated the commercial kit used, and 36.2% indicated the analyzer used.

CONCLUSIONS

The technical aspects of these determinations are not always reported in the literature. Journals should be attentive to these technical requirements and ensure that they are included in the works in which AAT is determined in order to ensure a correct interpretation of the study findings.

摘要

背景

目前,α1抗胰蛋白酶(AAT)血液浓度的研究是诊断AAT缺乏症的一个步骤。为了试图阐明实验室技术的相关性,我们对文献进行了系统综述。

方法

2021年7月在PubMed上搜索评估外周血中AAT定量的研究。选择标准包括:(1)任何类型的研究设计,其中包括外周血中AAT的定量;(2)用英语或西班牙语撰写的研究;(3)评估人类的研究;(4)涉及成年人的研究。

结果

在207项研究中,最常用的技术是散射比浊法(43.9%),其次是酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA,19.8%)和比浊法(13.5%)。总共182项(87.9%)研究以克为单位表示结果,而16项(7.7%)研究以摩尔为单位表示结果。只有2.9%的研究提及所使用的标准,43.5%的研究指出所使用的商业试剂盒,36.2%的研究指出所使用的分析仪。

结论

这些测定的技术方面在文献中并不总是有报道。期刊应关注这些技术要求,并确保在测定AAT的研究中包含这些要求,以确保对研究结果的正确解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5d9/8584727/f20f56f28203/jcm-10-05132-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验