Ruiz-Duque Borja, Bañuls Lucía, Reinoso-Arija Rocio, Carrasco-Hernandez Laura, Caballero-Eraso Candelaria, Dasí Francisco, Lopez-Campos José Luis
Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain.
Departamento de Fisiología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 31;10(21):5132. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215132.
The study of hematic concentrations of alpha1 antitrypsin (AAT) is currently one step in the diagnosis of AAT deficiency. To try to clarify the relevance of the laboratory techniques, we carried out a systematic review of the literature.
Studies evaluating the quantification of AAT in peripheral blood were searched in PubMed in July 2021. The selection criteria included (1) any type of study design that included a quantification of AAT in peripheral blood; (2) studies written in English or Spanish; (3) studies evaluating human beings; and (4) studies involving adults.
Out of 207 studies, the most frequently used techniques were nephelometry (43.9%), followed by ELISA (19.8%) and turbidimetry (13.5%). Altogether, 182 (87.9%) cases expressed their results in units of gram, while 16 (7.7%) articles expressed them in units of mole. Only 2.9% articles referred to the standard used, 43.5% articles indicated the commercial kit used, and 36.2% indicated the analyzer used.
The technical aspects of these determinations are not always reported in the literature. Journals should be attentive to these technical requirements and ensure that they are included in the works in which AAT is determined in order to ensure a correct interpretation of the study findings.
目前,α1抗胰蛋白酶(AAT)血液浓度的研究是诊断AAT缺乏症的一个步骤。为了试图阐明实验室技术的相关性,我们对文献进行了系统综述。
2021年7月在PubMed上搜索评估外周血中AAT定量的研究。选择标准包括:(1)任何类型的研究设计,其中包括外周血中AAT的定量;(2)用英语或西班牙语撰写的研究;(3)评估人类的研究;(4)涉及成年人的研究。
在207项研究中,最常用的技术是散射比浊法(43.9%),其次是酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA,19.8%)和比浊法(13.5%)。总共182项(87.9%)研究以克为单位表示结果,而16项(7.7%)研究以摩尔为单位表示结果。只有2.9%的研究提及所使用的标准,43.5%的研究指出所使用的商业试剂盒,36.2%的研究指出所使用的分析仪。
这些测定的技术方面在文献中并不总是有报道。期刊应关注这些技术要求,并确保在测定AAT的研究中包含这些要求,以确保对研究结果的正确解读。