Jalali Yashar, Kološová Andrea, Džupa Karol, Pavlovič Pavol, Jalali Monika, Rácek Peter, Zicháčková Nikola, Kyselovič Ján, Vasiková Adriana, Glodová Klaudia, Payer Juraj
Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Bratislava, Ružinov, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia, and Ružinovská 4810/6, 821 01 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Department of Hospital Hygiene and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bratislava, Ružinov, Ružinovská 4810/6, 821 01 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;13(12):1187. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13121187.
In healthcare environments with high microbial loads, effective infection control measures are critical for reducing airborne and surface contamination. One of the novel modalities in the achievement of these goals is the use of antimicrobial mists, such as droplets, in the form of dry fog. Although the usage of dry fog in the disinfection of contained healthcare microenvironments is well known, the effect of such a system in terms of a meaningful reduction in the microbial burden in an open inpatient ward is unclear. Our objective was to assess the impact of scheduled dry fogging on microbial reduction in such settings. We collected air and surface samples from rooms receiving daily, biweekly, or no fogging (controls) over six months, establishing the baseline contamination and evaluating the reduction trends in treated rooms. The "reduction effect" was measured by tracking microbial isolation trends before and after treatment, while the "degree of reduction" assessed differences across rooms with varied disinfection schedules. The results indicate that scheduled dry fogging significantly reduced microbial loads in treated rooms, especially with daily disinfection (SE = 64.484, = 0.002). The airborne contamination in treated rooms showed a strong downward trend over time (SE = 19.192, < 0.001). Surface contamination remained challenging due to frequent recontamination; however, treated rooms exhibited a consistent reduction in microbial presence (SE = 2.002, = 0.010), confirming dry fogging's role as a valuable adjunct to routine cleaning. In conclusion, this study highlights that dry fogging effectively reduces microbial loads in open, high-traffic healthcare environments, supporting its use as part of a multimodal infection control strategy.
在微生物负荷较高的医疗环境中,有效的感染控制措施对于减少空气传播和表面污染至关重要。实现这些目标的新方法之一是使用抗菌雾,如干雾形式的液滴。尽管干雾在封闭的医疗微环境消毒中的应用已广为人知,但这种系统在开放的住院病房中对显著降低微生物负荷的效果尚不清楚。我们的目标是评估定期进行干雾消毒对这类环境中微生物减少的影响。我们在六个月内从每天、每两周进行一次雾消毒的房间以及不进行雾消毒的房间(对照组)收集空气和表面样本,确定基线污染情况并评估处理后房间的减少趋势。“减少效果”通过追踪处理前后的微生物分离趋势来衡量,而“减少程度”则评估不同消毒计划的房间之间的差异。结果表明,定期进行干雾消毒显著降低了处理后房间的微生物负荷,尤其是每日消毒的情况(标准误 = 64.484,P = 0.002)。随着时间的推移,处理后房间的空气传播污染呈现出强烈的下降趋势(标准误 = 19.192,P < 0.001)。由于频繁的再污染,表面污染仍然具有挑战性;然而,处理后的房间微生物存在持续减少(标准误 = 2.002,P = 0.010),证实了干雾消毒作为常规清洁的宝贵辅助手段的作用。总之,本研究强调干雾消毒能有效降低开放、高流量医疗环境中的微生物负荷,支持将其作为多模式感染控制策略的一部分加以使用。