De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Nov 13;6(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00341-x.
All banknotes have security features which are intended to help determine whether they are false or genuine. Typically, however, the general public has limited knowledge of where on a banknote these security features can be found. Here, we tested whether counterfeit detection can be improved with the help of salient elements, designed to guide bottom-up visuospatial attention. We also tested the influence of the participant's a priori level of trust in the authenticity of the banknote. In an online study (N = 422), a demographically diverse panel of Dutch participants distinguished genuine banknotes from banknotes with one (left- or right-sided) counterfeited security feature. Either normal banknotes (without novel design elements) or banknotes that contained a salient element (a pink rectangular frame) were presented for 1 s. To manipulate the participant's level of trust, trials were administered in three blocks, whereby at the start of each block, participants were instructed that either one third, one half, or two thirds of the upcoming banknotes were counterfeit (though the true ratio was always 1:1). We hypothesized (i) that in the presence of a salient element, counterfeits would be better detected when the location of the salient element aligned with the location of the counterfeited security feature-i.e. that it would act as an attentional cue; and (ii) that this effect would be stronger with lower trust. Our hypotheses were partly confirmed: counterfeit detection improved with 'valid cues' and decreasing trust, but the level of trust did not modulate the cueing effect. As the overall detection performance was rather poor, we replicated the study with a sample of university students (N = 66), this time presenting stimuli until response. While indeed observing better overall performance, all other patterns were replicated. Our results provide evidence that attention can be guided to enhance banknote authentication.
所有钞票都具有旨在帮助确定其真伪的安全特征。然而,通常情况下,公众对这些安全特征可以在钞票的哪个位置找到的了解有限。在这里,我们测试了通过旨在引导自下而上的视觉注意的显著元素,是否可以改善假钞检测。我们还测试了参与者对钞票真伪的预先信任水平的影响。在一项在线研究(N=422)中,一个由荷兰不同背景的参与者组成的小组区分了真钞和具有一个(左侧或右侧)伪造安全特征的假钞。以 1 秒的速度呈现正常钞票(没有新颖设计元素)或包含显著元素(粉红色矩形框)的钞票。为了操纵参与者的信任水平,在三个块中进行了试验,在每个块的开始,参与者被指示即将到来的钞票中有三分之一、二分之一或三分之二是假钞(尽管真实比例总是 1:1)。我们假设(i)在存在显著元素的情况下,当显著元素的位置与伪造安全特征的位置对齐时,假钞的检测效果会更好,即它将充当注意力提示;(ii)随着信任度的降低,这种效果会更强。我们的假设得到了部分证实:假钞检测随着“有效提示”和信任度的降低而提高,但信任度并没有调节提示效应。由于整体检测性能相当差,我们在另一组大学生(N=66)中复制了这项研究,这次是直到有反应才呈现刺激。虽然确实观察到了整体表现的提高,但所有其他模式都得到了复制。我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明注意力可以被引导来增强钞票认证。