Hamon Loïc, Quintin Adrien, Mäurer Stephanie, Weinstein Isabel, Langenbucher Achim, Seitz Berthold, Daas Loay
Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Kirrberger Straße 100, Bldg. 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2022 Dec;23(4):695-706. doi: 10.1007/s10561-021-09980-2. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
To evaluate the reliability and efficiency of sterile pachymetric measurements of donor corneas based on tomographic data using two different methods: a "manual" and a "(semi-)automated" method. Twenty-five (25) donor corneas (50%) stored in MI and 25 (50%) in MII were imaged 5 times consecutively using an anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT). The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured both with the manual measurement tool of the AS-OCT (= CCTm) and with a MATLAB self-programmed software allowing (semi-)automated analysis (= CCTa). We analyzed the reliability of CCTm and CCTa using Cronbach´s alpha (α) and Wilcoxon signed-Rank Test. Concerning CCTm, 68 measurements (54.4%) in MI and 46 (36.8%) in MII presented distortions in the imaged 3D-volumes and were discarded. Concerning CCTa, 5 (4%) in MI and 1 (0.8%) in MII were not analyzable. The mean (± SD) CCTm was 1129 ± 6.8 in MI and 820 ± 5.1 µm in MII. The mean CCTa was 1149 ± 2.7 and 811 ± 2.4 µm, respectively. Both methods showed a high reliability with a Cronbach´s α for CCTm of 1.0 (MI/MII) and for CCTa of 0.99 (MI) and 1.0 (MII). Nevertheless, the mean SD of the 5 measurements was significantly higher for CCTm compared to CCTa in MI (p = 0.03), but not in MII (p = 0.92). Sterile donor tomography proves to be highly reliable for assessment of CCT with both methods. However, due to frequent distortions regarding the manual method, the (semi-)automated method is more efficient and should be preferred.
为了评估使用两种不同方法(“手动”和“(半)自动”方法)基于断层扫描数据对供体角膜进行无菌测厚测量的可靠性和效率。将25只(50%)储存在MI中的供体角膜和25只(50%)储存在MII中的供体角膜连续5次使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)进行成像。使用AS-OCT的手动测量工具(=CCTm)和允许(半)自动分析的MATLAB自编软件(=CCTa)测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)。我们使用Cronbach's α和Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析CCTm和CCTa的可靠性。关于CCTm,MI中有68次测量(54.4%)和MII中有46次测量(36.8%)在成像的三维体积中出现畸变,因此被舍弃。关于CCTa,MI中有5次测量(4%)和MII中有1次测量(0.8%)无法分析。MI中CCTm的平均值(±标准差)为1129±6.8,MII中为820±5.1μm。CCTa的平均值分别为1149±2.7和811±2.4μm。两种方法均显示出高可靠性,CCTm的Cronbach's α在MI/MII中为1.0,CCTa在MI中为0.99,在MII中为1.0。然而,在MI中,CCTm的5次测量的平均标准差显著高于CCTa(p=0.03),但在MII中并非如此(p=0.92)。两种方法对无菌供体断层扫描评估CCT均被证明具有高度可靠性。然而,由于手动方法经常出现畸变,(半)自动方法更高效,应优先选用。