Suppr超能文献

眼库中使用无菌供体断层扫描测量角膜厚度的可靠性和效率。

Reliability and efficiency of corneal thickness measurements using sterile donor tomography in the eye bank.

作者信息

Hamon Loïc, Quintin Adrien, Mäurer Stephanie, Weinstein Isabel, Langenbucher Achim, Seitz Berthold, Daas Loay

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Kirrberger Straße 100, Bldg. 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Cell Tissue Bank. 2022 Dec;23(4):695-706. doi: 10.1007/s10561-021-09980-2. Epub 2021 Nov 13.

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability and efficiency of sterile pachymetric measurements of donor corneas based on tomographic data using two different methods: a "manual" and a "(semi-)automated" method. Twenty-five (25) donor corneas (50%) stored in MI and 25 (50%) in MII were imaged 5 times consecutively using an anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT). The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured both with the manual measurement tool of the AS-OCT (= CCTm) and with a MATLAB self-programmed software allowing (semi-)automated analysis (= CCTa). We analyzed the reliability of CCTm and CCTa using Cronbach´s alpha (α) and Wilcoxon signed-Rank Test. Concerning CCTm, 68 measurements (54.4%) in MI and 46 (36.8%) in MII presented distortions in the imaged 3D-volumes and were discarded. Concerning CCTa, 5 (4%) in MI and 1 (0.8%) in MII were not analyzable. The mean (± SD) CCTm was 1129 ± 6.8 in MI and 820 ± 5.1 µm in MII. The mean CCTa was 1149 ± 2.7 and 811 ± 2.4 µm, respectively. Both methods showed a high reliability with a Cronbach´s α for CCTm of 1.0 (MI/MII) and for CCTa of 0.99 (MI) and 1.0 (MII). Nevertheless, the mean SD of the 5 measurements was significantly higher for CCTm compared to CCTa in MI (p = 0.03), but not in MII (p = 0.92). Sterile donor tomography proves to be highly reliable for assessment of CCT with both methods. However, due to frequent distortions regarding the manual method, the (semi-)automated method is more efficient and should be preferred.

摘要

为了评估使用两种不同方法(“手动”和“(半)自动”方法)基于断层扫描数据对供体角膜进行无菌测厚测量的可靠性和效率。将25只(50%)储存在MI中的供体角膜和25只(50%)储存在MII中的供体角膜连续5次使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)进行成像。使用AS-OCT的手动测量工具(=CCTm)和允许(半)自动分析的MATLAB自编软件(=CCTa)测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)。我们使用Cronbach's α和Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析CCTm和CCTa的可靠性。关于CCTm,MI中有68次测量(54.4%)和MII中有46次测量(36.8%)在成像的三维体积中出现畸变,因此被舍弃。关于CCTa,MI中有5次测量(4%)和MII中有1次测量(0.8%)无法分析。MI中CCTm的平均值(±标准差)为1129±6.8,MII中为820±5.1μm。CCTa的平均值分别为1149±2.7和811±2.4μm。两种方法均显示出高可靠性,CCTm的Cronbach's α在MI/MII中为1.0,CCTa在MI中为0.99,在MII中为1.0。然而,在MI中,CCTm的5次测量的平均标准差显著高于CCTa(p=0.03),但在MII中并非如此(p=0.92)。两种方法对无菌供体断层扫描评估CCT均被证明具有高度可靠性。然而,由于手动方法经常出现畸变,(半)自动方法更高效,应优先选用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75ee/9675654/47eca3a60a6c/10561_2021_9980_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验