Suppr超能文献

推进试验的参与方法:CORE研究中针对严重精神疾病患者基于体验的协同设计阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的参与关系模型

Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses.

作者信息

Richard Lauralie, Piper Donella, Weavell Wayne, Callander Rosemary, Iedema Rick, Furler John, Pierce David, Godbee Kali, Gunn Jane, Palmer Victoria J

机构信息

The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 200, Berkeley Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.

The Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1878-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engagement is essential in trials research but is rarely embedded across all stages of the research continuum. The development, use, effectiveness and value of engagement in trials research is poorly researched and understood, and models of engagement are rarely informed by theory. This article describes an innovative methodological approach for the development and application of a relational model of engagement in a stepped wedge designed cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), the CORE study. The purpose of the model is to embed engagement across the continuum of the trial which will test if an experience-based co-design intervention improves psychosocial recovery for people affected by severe mental illness.

METHODS

The model was developed in three stages and used a structured iterative approach. A context mapping assessment of trial sites was followed by a literature review on recruitment and retention of hard-to-reach groups in complex interventions and RCTs. Relevant theoretical and philosophical underpinnings were identified by an additional review of literature to inform model development and enactment of engagement activities.

RESULTS

Policy, organisational and service user data combined with evidence from the literature on barriers to recruitment provided contextual information. Four perspectives support the theoretical framework of the relational model of engagement and this is organised around two facets: the relational and continuous. The relational facet is underpinned by relational ethical theories and participatory action research principles. The continuous facet is supported by systems thinking and translation theories. These combine to enact an ethics of engagement and evoke knowledge mobilisation to reach the higher order goals of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Engagement models are invaluable for trials research, but there are opportunities to advance their theoretical development and application, particularly within stepped wedge designed studies where there may be a significant waiting period between enrolment in a study and receipt of an intervention.

摘要

背景

参与在试验研究中至关重要,但在研究连续体的所有阶段很少被全面融入。试验研究中参与的发展、使用、有效性和价值研究不足且理解有限,参与模式很少有理论依据。本文描述了一种创新的方法,用于在一项阶梯式楔形设计的整群随机对照试验(RCT)即CORE研究中开发和应用参与关系模型。该模型的目的是在试验的整个过程中融入参与,以检验基于经验的协同设计干预是否能改善重度精神疾病患者的心理社会康复情况。

方法

该模型分三个阶段开发,并采用结构化迭代方法。首先对试验地点进行情境映射评估,随后对复杂干预和随机对照试验中难以接触群体的招募和保留进行文献综述。通过额外的文献综述确定相关的理论和哲学基础,以为模型开发和参与活动的实施提供参考。

结果

政策、组织和服务使用者数据与关于招募障碍的文献证据相结合,提供了背景信息。四个视角支持参与关系模型的理论框架,该框架围绕两个方面组织:关系性和连续性。关系性方面以关系伦理理论和参与式行动研究原则为基础。连续性方面得到系统思维和转化理论的支持。这些相结合以实施参与伦理并引发知识调动,以实现模型的更高层次目标。

结论

参与模型对试验研究非常重要,但仍有机会推进其理论发展和应用,特别是在阶梯式楔形设计的研究中,在这类研究中,从参与研究到接受干预之间可能有很长的等待期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/946f/5385022/c52cfa6cc213/13063_2017_1878_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验