• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于追踪的脑损伤儿童扫视、追踪、视野和对比敏感度的交互式评估

Tracking-Based Interactive Assessment of Saccades, Pursuits, Visual Field, and Contrast Sensitivity in Children With Brain Injury.

作者信息

Mooney Scott W J, Alam Nazia M, Prusky Glen T

机构信息

Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, NY, United States.

Blythedale Children's Hospital, Valhalla, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 29;15:737409. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.737409. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2021.737409
PMID:34776907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8586078/
Abstract

Visual deficits in children that result from brain injury, including cerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI), are difficult to assess through conventional methods due to their frequent co-occurrence with cognitive and communicative disabilities. Such impairments hence often go undiagnosed or are only determined through subjective evaluations of gaze-based reactions to different forms, colors, and movements, which limits any potential for remediation. Here, we describe a novel approach to grading visual health based on eye movements and evidence from gaze-based tracking behaviors. Our approach-the "Visual Ladder"-reduces reliance on the user's ability to attend and communicate. The Visual Ladder produces metrics that quantify spontaneous saccades and pursuits, assess visual field responsiveness, and grade spatial visual function from tracking responses to moving stimuli. We used the Ladder to assess fourteen hospitalized children aged 3 to 18 years with a diverse range of visual impairments and causes of brain injury. Four children were excluded from analysis due to incompatibility with the eye tracker (e.g., due to severe strabismus). The remaining ten children-including five non-verbal children-were tested multiple times over periods ranging from 2 weeks to 9 months, and all produced interpretable outcomes on at least three of the five visual tasks. The results suggest that our assessment tasks are viable in non-communicative children, provided their eyes can be tracked, and hence are promising tools for use in a larger clinical study. We highlight and discuss informative outcomes exhibited by each child, including directional biases in eye movements, pathological nystagmus, visual field asymmetries, and contrast sensitivity deficits. Our findings indicate that these methodologies will enable the rapid, objective classification and grading of visual impairments in children with CVI, including non-verbal children who are currently precluded from most vision assessments. This would provide a much-needed differential diagnostic and prognostic tool for CVI and other impairments of the visual system, both ocular and cerebral.

摘要

脑损伤导致的儿童视觉障碍,包括脑性/皮质性视觉损害(CVI),由于其经常与认知和交流障碍同时出现,很难通过传统方法进行评估。因此,此类损伤往往未被诊断出来,或者仅通过对不同形状、颜色和运动的基于注视的反应进行主观评估来确定,这限制了任何补救的可能性。在此,我们描述了一种基于眼动和基于注视的跟踪行为证据来对视觉健康进行分级的新方法。我们的方法——“视觉阶梯”——减少了对用户注意力和交流能力的依赖。“视觉阶梯”产生的指标可以量化自发扫视和追踪、评估视野反应性,并根据对移动刺激的跟踪反应对空间视觉功能进行分级。我们使用“阶梯”对14名年龄在3至18岁之间、患有各种视觉障碍和脑损伤原因的住院儿童进行了评估。由于与眼动仪不兼容(例如,由于严重斜视),有4名儿童被排除在分析之外。其余10名儿童——包括5名非言语儿童——在2周至9个月的时间内进行了多次测试,并且在五项视觉任务中的至少三项上都产生了可解释的结果。结果表明,我们的评估任务对于无法交流的儿童是可行的,前提是他们的眼睛可以被跟踪,因此是用于更大规模临床研究的有前景的工具。我们突出并讨论了每个儿童表现出的信息性结果,包括眼动的方向偏差、病理性眼球震颤、视野不对称和对比敏感度缺陷。我们的研究结果表明,这些方法将能够对患有CVI的儿童,包括目前被大多数视力评估排除在外的非言语儿童的视觉障碍进行快速、客观的分类和分级。这将为CVI和其他视觉系统损伤(包括眼部和脑部损伤)提供急需的鉴别诊断和预后工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/2fd987a82ad1/fnhum-15-737409-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/b0531fb20c0c/fnhum-15-737409-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/4ec90a1bef9c/fnhum-15-737409-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/159c6f829f79/fnhum-15-737409-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/02c76390c7c6/fnhum-15-737409-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/665d7fad041f/fnhum-15-737409-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/d92384f1e1d8/fnhum-15-737409-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/fb74da26c2ca/fnhum-15-737409-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/3af2fd1b1284/fnhum-15-737409-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/cc541737c88c/fnhum-15-737409-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/2fd987a82ad1/fnhum-15-737409-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/b0531fb20c0c/fnhum-15-737409-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/4ec90a1bef9c/fnhum-15-737409-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/159c6f829f79/fnhum-15-737409-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/02c76390c7c6/fnhum-15-737409-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/665d7fad041f/fnhum-15-737409-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/d92384f1e1d8/fnhum-15-737409-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/fb74da26c2ca/fnhum-15-737409-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/3af2fd1b1284/fnhum-15-737409-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/cc541737c88c/fnhum-15-737409-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203f/8586078/2fd987a82ad1/fnhum-15-737409-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Tracking-Based Interactive Assessment of Saccades, Pursuits, Visual Field, and Contrast Sensitivity in Children With Brain Injury.基于追踪的脑损伤儿童扫视、追踪、视野和对比敏感度的交互式评估
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 29;15:737409. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.737409. eCollection 2021.
2
Quantitative patterns of visual impairment and recovery in children with brain injury.脑损伤儿童视力损害及恢复的量化模式。
Res Sq. 2024 Jul 30:rs.3.rs-4511323. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4511323/v1.
3
Quantification of visual function assessment using remote eye tracking in children: validity and applicability.利用远程眼动追踪技术对儿童视觉功能评估进行量化:有效性与适用性
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;94(6):599-608. doi: 10.1111/aos.13038. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
The Multidisciplinary Guidelines for Diagnosis and Referral in Cerebral Visual Impairment.脑性视觉障碍诊断与转诊多学科指南
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 30;16:727565. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.727565. eCollection 2022.
5
Childhood cerebral visual impairment subtype classification based on an extensive versus a limited test battery.基于广泛与有限测试组的儿童脑性视觉障碍亚型分类
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 26;17:1266201. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1266201. eCollection 2023.
6
Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.扫视矢量视动性视野检查的可行性:一种利用眼动追踪的儿童自动静态视野检查方法。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):2017-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
7
Deficits in saccades and smooth-pursuit eye movements in adults with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤性脑损伤成人的扫视和平稳跟踪眼球运动缺陷:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Inj. 2018;32(11):1315-1336. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1483030. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
Disentangling How the Brain is "Wired" in Cortical (Cerebral) Visual Impairment.解析大脑在皮质(大脑)性视觉障碍中的“连接方式”。
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017 May;24(2):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Exploratory Investigation of Brain MRI Lesions According to Whole Sample and Visual Function Subtyping in Children With Cerebral Visual Impairment.根据全样本和视觉功能亚型对脑性视觉障碍儿童脑MRI病变的探索性研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jan 6;15:765371. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.765371. eCollection 2021.
10
Dose-dependent sensorimotor impairment in human ocular tracking after acute low-dose alcohol administration.急性低剂量酒精摄入后人体眼球追踪的剂量依赖性感觉运动障碍。
J Physiol. 2021 Feb;599(4):1225-1242. doi: 10.1113/JP280395. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment Classification and Categorization Using Eye Tracking Measures of Oculomotor Function.使用眼动功能的眼动追踪测量对脑性/皮质性视觉障碍进行分类和分级
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Feb 3;5(3):100728. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100728. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.连续心理物理学:过去、现在与未来。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 May;29(5):481-493. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Special Commentary: Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment Working Definition: A Report from the National Institutes of Health CVI Workshop.

本文引用的文献

1
: A neuroscientist's sound toolkit.一位神经科学家的可靠工具集。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 10;7(2):e06236. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06236. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Gradiate: A radial sweep approach to measuring detailed contrast sensitivity functions from eye movements.梯度法:一种通过眼球运动测量详细对比敏感度函数的径向扫描方法。
J Vis. 2020 Dec 2;20(13):17. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.13.17.
3
What assessments are currently used to investigate and diagnose cerebral visual impairment (CVI) in children? A systematic review.目前用于评估和诊断儿童脑性视觉障碍(CVI)的方法有哪些?一项系统评价。
特稿评论:脑/皮质性视觉障碍工作定义:来自美国国立卫生研究院 CVI 研讨会的报告。
Ophthalmology. 2024 Dec;131(12):1359-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.017.
4
Quantitative patterns of visual impairment and recovery in children with brain injury.脑损伤儿童视力损害及恢复的量化模式。
Res Sq. 2024 Jul 30:rs.3.rs-4511323. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4511323/v1.
5
Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.验光中的眼动追踪:一项系统综述。
J Eye Mov Res. 2023 Aug 16;16(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.3.3. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of Eye Tracking and Teller Acuity Cards for Visual Acuity Assessment in Pediatric Cortical/Cerebral Visual Impairment.眼动追踪与视力表卡在儿童皮质/脑性视觉障碍患者视力评估中的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr;260:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
The application of saccades to assess cognitive impairment among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.扫视在评估老年人认知障碍中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2307-2321. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02546-0. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
Assessing Higher-Order Visual Processing in Cerebral Visual Impairment Using Naturalistic Virtual-Reality-Based Visual Search Tasks.使用基于自然主义虚拟现实的视觉搜索任务评估脑性视觉损伤中的高阶视觉处理
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 26;9(8):1114. doi: 10.3390/children9081114.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):224-244. doi: 10.1111/opo.12776. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
4
Methods of visual assessment in children with cortical visual impairment.儿童皮质性视觉障碍的视觉评估方法。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):89-96. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000877.
5
Horizontal and vertical self-paced saccades as a diagnostic marker of traumatic brain injury.水平和垂直自定步速扫视作为创伤性脑损伤的诊断标志物
Concussion. 2019 Jul 25;4(1):CNC60. doi: 10.2217/cnc-2019-0001.
6
Shady: A software engine for real-time visual stimulus manipulation.Shady:一个用于实时视觉刺激操纵的软件引擎。
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 May 15;320:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Curveball: A tool for rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity based on smooth eye movements.Curveball:一种基于平稳眼球运动的快速测量对比敏感度的工具。
J Vis. 2018 Nov 1;18(12):7. doi: 10.1167/18.12.7.
8
Data obtained with an open-source static automated perimetry test of the full visual field in healthy adults.通过开源静态自动视野计对健康成年人进行全视野测试获得的数据。
Data Brief. 2018 Sep 29;21:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.079. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Will eye tracking change the way we diagnose and classify concussion and structural brain injury?眼动追踪会改变我们诊断和分类脑震荡及脑结构性损伤的方式吗?
Concussion. 2015 Aug 6;1(1):CNC2. doi: 10.2217/cnc.15.2. eCollection 2016 Mar.
10
Eye Tracking as a Biomarker for Concussion in Children.眼动追踪作为儿童脑震荡的生物标志物。
Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Sep;30(5):433-443. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000639.