• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物质使用者及其父母或伴侣的主观幸福感比较。

Comparison of subjective wellbeing in substance users and the parents or partners of substance users.

机构信息

National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S415-S419. doi: 10.1111/dar.12615. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/dar.12615
PMID:29024074
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

There is growing interest in the impact of substance use on both the individual consumer's subjective wellbeing (SWB) and the reduced SWB of those closely connected to him or her. The study aimed to compare SWB among substance users ('consumers') and the parents or partners affected by another's substance use, and to evaluate the effect of counselling on changed SWB to 6 months.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The study used longitudinal data from a not-for-profit treatment service based in Perth, Australia. Subjective wellbeing was assessed with the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) at baseline and 6 months. Data were compared to national norms (mean 75.97) with one sample t tests. Change in PWI scores was assessed with generalised linear mixed models, controlling for age, gender, group (consumers versus parents or partners), psychological distress (Kessler-10) and social connectedness (Lubben).

RESULTS

Of 220 participants, 136 (62%) were consumers and 84 (38%) were parents or partners. At 6 months 123 (56%) were re-interviewed. At baseline, both consumers (mean 53.7) and parents or partners (mean 66.1) had significantly lower PWI scores than national norms. At 6 months, only the substance users' PWI scores remained significantly lower (mean 67.8). Subjective wellbeing significantly increased with time (β = 5.52; 95% confidence interval 3.15, 7.90), with no significant time by group interaction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Both groups showed significant decrements in SWB compared with the general population but with improvements over the study period. However, the lack of a control group prevents definitive assertions on causality for improved SWB.

摘要

引言和目的

人们越来越关注物质使用对个体消费者的主观幸福感(SWB)以及与其密切相关的人的降低的 SWB 的影响。本研究旨在比较物质使用者(“消费者”)和受他人物质使用影响的父母或伴侣的 SWB,并评估咨询对 6 个月时 SWB 变化的影响。

设计和方法

该研究使用了澳大利亚珀斯非营利性治疗服务的纵向数据。在基线和 6 个月时使用个人幸福感指数(PWI)评估主观幸福感。使用单样本 t 检验将数据与全国平均值(均值 75.97)进行比较。使用广义线性混合模型评估 PWI 评分的变化,控制年龄、性别、组(消费者与父母或伴侣)、心理困扰(Kessler-10)和社会联系(Lubben)。

结果

在 220 名参与者中,136 名(62%)是消费者,84 名(38%)是父母或伴侣。在 6 个月时,有 123 名(56%)接受了重新访谈。在基线时,消费者(均值 53.7)和父母或伴侣(均值 66.1)的 PWI 评分均明显低于全国平均值。在 6 个月时,只有物质使用者的 PWI 评分仍然明显较低(均值 67.8)。主观幸福感随着时间的推移显著增加(β=5.52;95%置信区间 3.15,7.90),组间无显著的时间交互作用。

讨论和结论

与一般人群相比,两组的 SWB 都明显下降,但在研究期间有所改善。然而,缺乏对照组使得对于改善的 SWB 的因果关系无法做出明确的断言。

相似文献

1
Comparison of subjective wellbeing in substance users and the parents or partners of substance users.物质使用者及其父母或伴侣的主观幸福感比较。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S415-S419. doi: 10.1111/dar.12615. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
2
Measuring subjective wellbeing in patients with heart disease: relationship and comparison between health-related quality of life instruments.测量心脏病患者的主观幸福感:健康相关生活质量工具的关系和比较。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1017-1028. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2094-y. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Comparing subjective well-being and health-related quality of life of Australian drug users in treatment in regional and rural Victoria.比较维多利亚州地区和农村接受治疗的澳大利亚吸毒者的主观幸福感和与健康相关的生活质量。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 Nov;33(6):651-7. doi: 10.1111/dar.12124. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
4
Subjective wellbeing in the Indian general population: a validation study of the Personal Wellbeing Index.印度一般人群的主观幸福感:个人幸福感指数的验证研究。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Apr;29(4):1073-1081. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02375-7. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Nearby Nature 'Buffers' the Effect of Low Social Connectedness on Adult Subjective Wellbeing over the Last 7 Days.近自然环境“缓冲”了低社交关联性对成年人过去 7 天主观幸福感的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 12;15(6):1238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061238.
6
The relationship between endometriosis-related pelvic pain and symptom frequency, and subjective wellbeing.内异症相关盆腔痛与症状频率和主观幸福感的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jul 16;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1185-y.
7
Subjective wellbeing and ‘felt’ stigma when living with HIV.主观幸福感与 HIV 感染者的“主观”污名
Qual Life Res. 2013 Feb;22(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0125-7.
8
Factors associated with subjective well-being in cancer workers in Queensland.昆士兰癌症工作者主观幸福感的相关因素。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun;56(3):347-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02368.x. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
The subjective wellbeing of people living with Multiple Sclerosis in Australia: insights from the Personal Wellbeing Index.澳大利亚多发性硬化症患者的主观幸福感:来自个人幸福感指数的洞察。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Sep 30;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02278-3.
10
The Subjective Well-being and Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adults with Increased Intestinal Permeability and Associations with Treatment Interventions.澳大利亚肠通透性增加成年人的主观幸福感和健康相关生活质量及其与治疗干预的关系。
J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):1136-1146. doi: 10.1089/acm.2021.0202. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Report Measurement of Well-Being in Autistic Adults: Psychometric Properties of the PERMA Profiler.自闭症成年人幸福感的自我报告测量:PERMA剖析仪的心理测量特性。
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Dec 1;5(4):401-410. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0049. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
The effect of gambling problems on the subjective wellbeing of gamblers' family and friends: Evidence from large-scale population research in Australia and Canada.赌博问题对赌徒家人和朋友主观幸福感的影响:来自澳大利亚和加拿大大规模人口研究的证据。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Nov 16;10(4):941-52. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00077.
3
Longitudinal Substance Use and Biopsychosocial Outcomes Following Therapeutic Community Treatment for Substance Dependence.
物质依赖治疗社区治疗后的纵向物质使用及生物心理社会结局
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 1;9(1):118. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010118.