Ahn Na Young, Park Jun Eun, Lee Dong Hoon, Hong Paul C
Institute of Cyber Security and Privacy, Korea University Seoul 02841 South Korea.
Department of PediatricsKorea University College of Medicine Seoul 02842 South Korea.
IEEE Access. 2020 Sep 22;8:171325-171333. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025971. eCollection 2020.
There has been vigorous debate on how different countries responded to the COVID-19 pandemic. To secure public safety, South Korea actively used personal information at the risk of personal privacy whereas France encouraged voluntary cooperation at the risk of public safety. In this article, after a brief comparison of contextual differences with France, we focus on South Korea's approaches to epidemiological investigations. To evaluate the issues pertaining to personal privacy and public health, we examine the usage patterns of original data, de-identification data, and encrypted data. Our specific proposal discusses the COVID index, which considers collective infection, outbreak intensity, availability of medical infrastructure, and the death rate. Finally, we summarize the findings and lessons for future research and the policy implications.
关于不同国家如何应对新冠疫情,一直存在激烈的争论。为确保公共安全,韩国冒着侵犯个人隐私的风险积极使用个人信息,而法国则冒着公共安全的风险鼓励自愿合作。在本文中,在与法国的背景差异进行简要比较之后,我们将重点关注韩国的流行病学调查方法。为了评估与个人隐私和公共卫生相关的问题,我们研究了原始数据、去识别化数据和加密数据的使用模式。我们的具体提议讨论了新冠指数,该指数考虑了集体感染、疫情强度、医疗基础设施的可用性和死亡率。最后,我们总结了研究结果以及对未来研究的启示和政策含义。