• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经网络对图像分类损坏的敏感性。

Sensitivity of neural networks to corruption of image classification.

作者信息

Kaplan Shimon, Handelman Doron, Handelman Amir

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel.

Givatayim, Israel.

出版信息

AI Ethics. 2021;1(4):425-434. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00049-0. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s43681-021-00049-0
PMID:34790945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7985580/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are extensively used today in many fields. In the field of medicine, AI-systems are especially used for the segmentation and classification of medical images. As reliance on such AI-systems increases, it is important to verify that these systems are dependable and not sensitive to bias or other types of errors that may severely affect users and patients. This work investigates the sensitivity of the performance of AI-systems to labeling errors. Such investigation is performed by simulating intentional mislabeling of training images according to different values of a new parameter called "mislabeling balance" and a "corruption" parameter, and then measuring the accuracy of the AI-systems for every value of these parameters. The issues investigated in this work include the amount (percentage) of errors from which a substantial adverse effect on the performance of the AI-systems can be observed, and how unreliable labeling can be done in the training stage. The goals of this work are to raise ethical concerns regarding the various types of errors that can possibly find their way into AI-systems, to demonstrate the effect of training errors, and to encourage development of techniques that can cope with the problem of errors, especially for AI-systems that perform sensitive medical-related tasks.

摘要

如今,人工智能(AI)系统在许多领域都得到了广泛应用。在医学领域,AI系统尤其用于医学图像的分割和分类。随着对这类AI系统的依赖程度不断增加,验证这些系统是否可靠,以及是否对可能严重影响用户和患者的偏差或其他类型的错误不敏感,变得至关重要。这项工作研究了AI系统性能对标注错误的敏感性。这种研究是通过根据一个名为“错误标注平衡”的新参数和一个“损坏”参数的不同值,模拟训练图像的故意错误标注来进行的,然后针对这些参数的每个值测量AI系统的准确性。这项工作所研究的问题包括:能观察到对AI系统性能产生重大不利影响的错误数量(百分比),以及在训练阶段如何进行不可靠的标注。这项工作的目标是引发人们对可能混入AI系统的各类错误的伦理关注,展示训练错误的影响,并鼓励开发能够应对错误问题的技术,特别是对于执行敏感医疗相关任务的AI系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/15df4e6eb462/43681_2021_49_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/4dd8f5c1c6a3/43681_2021_49_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/5a3a52e9751d/43681_2021_49_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/bc501304ae7b/43681_2021_49_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/067d1920cb85/43681_2021_49_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/6bb46e06a44a/43681_2021_49_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/15df4e6eb462/43681_2021_49_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/4dd8f5c1c6a3/43681_2021_49_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/5a3a52e9751d/43681_2021_49_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/bc501304ae7b/43681_2021_49_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/067d1920cb85/43681_2021_49_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/6bb46e06a44a/43681_2021_49_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ed/7985580/15df4e6eb462/43681_2021_49_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity of neural networks to corruption of image classification.神经网络对图像分类损坏的敏感性。
AI Ethics. 2021;1(4):425-434. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00049-0. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review.人工智能与临床医生在疾病诊断中的比较:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 16;7(3):e10010. doi: 10.2196/10010.
3
Artificial intelligence applications in gastroenterology: steps ahead.人工智能在胃肠病学中的应用:领先一步。
Med Pharm Rep. 2021 Nov;94(Suppl No 3):S56-S59. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2513. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
4
Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists' Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study.人工智能及其对皮肤科医生在皮肤镜黑色素瘤图像分类中准确性的影响:基于网络的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 11;22(9):e18091. doi: 10.2196/18091.
5
Toward High-Throughput Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation in Oncological PET Imaging.迈向基于高通量人工智能的肿瘤 PET 成像分割。
PET Clin. 2021 Oct;16(4):577-596. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.06.001.
6
AI-Based Detection, Classification and Prediction/Prognosis in Medical Imaging:: Towards Radiophenomics.基于人工智能的医学影像学检测、分类和预测/预后:迈向放射组学。
PET Clin. 2022 Jan;17(1):183-212. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.09.010.
7
Artificial intelligence-based detection of pharyngeal cancer using convolutional neural networks.基于卷积神经网络的咽癌人工智能检测。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Nov;32(7):1057-1065. doi: 10.1111/den.13653. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Demystifying artificial intelligence and deep learning in dentistry.揭开牙科人工智能和深度学习的神秘面纱。
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Aug 13;35:e094. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0094. eCollection 2021.
9
AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning.人工智能在医学图像中的应用:从机器学习到深度学习。
Phys Med. 2021 Mar;83:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
10
Evaluating predictive models in reproductive medicine.生殖医学中的预测模型评估。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Nov;114(5):921-926. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.159.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical considerations and robustness of artificial neural networks in medical image analysis under data corruption.数据损坏情况下医学图像分析中人工神经网络的伦理考量与稳健性
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 11;15(1):29305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15268-2.
2
Large language models show amplified cognitive biases in moral decision-making.大语言模型在道德决策中表现出放大的认知偏差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2412015122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412015122. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
3
Impact of annotation imperfections and auto-curation for deep learning-based organ-at-risk segmentation.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Financial Sector-Potential and Public Strategies.金融领域的人工智能——潜力与公共策略
Front Artif Intell. 2019 Oct 4;2:16. doi: 10.3389/frai.2019.00016. eCollection 2019.
2
Is facial recognition too biased to be let loose?面部识别是否存在太多偏见而不能放任使用?
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7834):347-349. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03186-4.
3
Ethical considerations for artificial intelligence: an overview of the current radiology landscape.人工智能伦理考量:当前放射学领域概述。
注释缺陷和自动整理对基于深度学习的危及器官分割的影响。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Dec 4;32:100684. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100684. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 Sep;26(5):504-511. doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19279.
4
Secure and Robust Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Survey.用于医疗保健的安全可靠机器学习:一项综述。
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;14:156-180. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2020.3013489. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis.医学影像数据集的性别失衡会导致计算机辅助诊断的分类器产生偏差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 9;117(23):12592-12594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919012117. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI.深度学习在图像重建中的不稳定性及人工智能的潜在代价
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 1;117(48):30088-30095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907377117. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement.人工智能在放射学中的伦理问题:欧洲与北美多学会联合声明概要。
Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):436-440. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191586. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning.对医学机器学习的对抗攻击。
Science. 2019 Mar 22;363(6433):1287-1289. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4399.
9
Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine.医学人工智能导论。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Apr;28(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1575882. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.人工智能、偏差与临床安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):231-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370. Epub 2019 Jan 12.