• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊拉克库尔德地区传染病监测系统的及时性和质量评估。

An Assessment of Timeliness and Quality of Communicable Disease Surveillance System in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

机构信息

College of Health and Medical Technology, 467127Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

College of Health and Medical Technology, 467127Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaiman, Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211056045. doi: 10.1177/00469580211056045.

DOI:10.1177/00469580211056045
PMID:34794356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8607484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quality of the surveillance system can be defined by attributes such as completeness, timeliness, usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, and reliability. This study aims to assess these quality features of the communicable disease surveillance system (CDSS) in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a retrospective review of records and documents, and the interviews with the surveillance staff (n = 82) of the Kurdistan governorates during 2018, 2019, and 2020. The World Health Organization (WHO) guideline 2006 indicators were used for evaluation and monitoring the quality of the communicable disease surveillance system. The data analyzed and showed as frequencies and percentages using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 software.

RESULTS

The reporting timeliness declined from 98% in 2019 to 69% in 2020. At the same time, there was an improvement in completeness of reporting from 83% in 2018 to 99% in 2020. The total scores of other surveillance quality attributes, simplicity, usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, and reliability, were 75%, 72%, 67%, 72%, and 69%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current findings demonstrate that the CDSS is still facing significant challenges in timeliness simplicity, usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, and reliability. Further studies to assess the system's quality, particularly the system's timeliness of outbreak response, sensitivity, and specificity, are recommended.

摘要

背景

监测系统的质量可以通过完整性、及时性、有用性、简单性、灵活性、可接受性和可靠性等属性来定义。本研究旨在评估伊拉克库尔德地区传染病监测系统(CDSS)的这些质量特征。

方法

本研究采用回顾性记录和文件审查,并对 2018 年、2019 年和 2020 年库尔德地区各省份的监测人员(n=82)进行访谈。采用世界卫生组织(WHO)2006 年指标对传染病监测系统的质量进行评估和监测。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本 26 对数据进行分析,并以百分比的形式显示频率。

结果

报告的及时性从 2019 年的 98%下降到 2020 年的 69%。与此同时,报告的完整性从 2018 年的 83%提高到 2020 年的 99%。其他监测质量属性的总得分分别为:简单性 75%、有用性 72%、灵活性 67%、可接受性 72%和可靠性 69%。

结论

目前的研究结果表明,CDSS 在及时性、简单性、有用性、灵活性、可接受性和可靠性方面仍面临重大挑战。建议进一步研究评估该系统的质量,特别是系统对疫情的及时性反应、敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4174/8607484/519665d34960/10.1177_00469580211056045-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4174/8607484/519665d34960/10.1177_00469580211056045-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4174/8607484/519665d34960/10.1177_00469580211056045-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
An Assessment of Timeliness and Quality of Communicable Disease Surveillance System in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.伊拉克库尔德地区传染病监测系统的及时性和质量评估。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211056045. doi: 10.1177/00469580211056045.
2
Assessment of core and support functions of the communicable disease surveillance system in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.伊拉克库尔德地区传染病监测系统核心和支撑功能评估。
J Med Virol. 2022 Feb;94(2):469-479. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27288. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
3
Assessment of electronic disease early warning system for improved disease surveillance and outbreak response in Yemen.评估电子疾病预警系统,以改善也门的疾病监测和疫情应对。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;20(1):1422. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09460-4.
4
The lessons of COVID-19 pandemic for communicable diseases surveillance system in Kurdistan Region of Iraq.新冠疫情给伊拉克库尔德地区传染病监测系统带来的教训。
Health Policy Technol. 2023 Mar;12(1):100717. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100717. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Under-ascertainment, under-reporting and timeliness of Iranian communicable disease surveillance system for zoonotic diseases.伊朗人畜共患病传染病监测系统的漏报、报告不足及及时性
Public Health. 2018 Jan;154:130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Feasibility of implementing recommendations to improve communicable diseases surveillance--a modified Delphi study.实施改善传染病监测建议的可行性——一项改良德尔菲研究
Afr Health Sci. 2011 Aug;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S93-9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v11i3.70077.
7
Challenges for communicable disease surveillance and control in southern Iraq, April-June 2003.2003年4月至6月伊拉克南部传染病监测与控制面临的挑战
JAMA. 2003 Aug 6;290(5):654-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.5.654.
8
Evaluation of the maternal mortality surveillance system in Mutare district, Zimbabwe, 2014-2015: a cross sectional study.2014 - 2015年津巴布韦穆塔雷区孕产妇死亡监测系统评估:一项横断面研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jul 18;27:204. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.204.7210. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of a methodology for a collaborative multiple source surveillance network for autism spectrum disorders--Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2002.用于自闭症谱系障碍的协作多源监测网络的方法评估——自闭症与发育障碍监测网络,美国14个站点,2002年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Feb 9;56(1):29-40.
10
A method for evaluating systems of epidemiological surveillance.一种评估流行病学监测系统的方法。
World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(1):11-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Income-Based analysis of health security in Western Asia through an integrated GHSI, MCDM, and Clustering Model.通过综合全球卫生安全指数(GHSI)、多准则决策方法(MCDM)和聚类模型对西亚卫生安全进行基于收入的分析。
F1000Res. 2025 Mar 28;14:43. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159002.1. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of core and support functions of the communicable disease surveillance system in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.伊拉克库尔德地区传染病监测系统核心和支撑功能评估。
J Med Virol. 2022 Feb;94(2):469-479. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27288. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
2
Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2001-2018.《2001-2018 年世卫组织东地中海区域新发和再发传染病》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1286-1300. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.13. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries.
新冠疫情背景下的卫生安全能力:对 182 个国家《国际卫生条例》年度报告数据的分析。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
Evaluation of the influenza-like illness surveillance system in Tunisia, 2012-2015.2012-2015 年突尼斯流感样疾病监测系统评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7035-3.
5
Evaluation of Ebola virus disease surveillance system in Tonkolili District, Sierra Leone.塞拉利昂通科利利区埃博拉病毒病监测系统评估
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jan 21;32(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2019.32.1.14434. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluation of the Completeness and Timeliness of National Malaria Surveillance System in Qatar, 2016.2016年卡塔尔国家疟疾监测系统的完整性和及时性评估
Cureus. 2018 Jun 21;10(6):e2851. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2851.
7
Data quality and timeliness of outbreak reporting system among countries in Greater Mekong subregion: Challenges for international data sharing.大湄公河次区域国家疫情报告系统的数据质量和及时性:国际数据共享面临的挑战。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 25;12(4):e0006425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006425. eCollection 2018 Apr.
8
Timeliness in the German surveillance system for infectious diseases: Amendment of the infection protection act in 2013 decreased local reporting time to 1 day.德国传染病监测系统的及时性:2013年《感染保护法》的修订将本地报告时间缩短至1天。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 31;12(10):e0187037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187037. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of the reporting completeness and timeliness of the integrated disease surveillance and response system in northern Ghana.加纳北部综合疾病监测与应对系统报告完整性和及时性评估
Ghana Med J. 2016 Mar;50(1):3-8. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i1.1.
10
Performance assessment of communicable disease surveillance in disasters: a systematic review.灾害中传染病监测的绩效评估:一项系统综述
PLoS Curr. 2015 Feb 24;7:ecurrents.dis.c72864d9c7ee99ff8fbe9ea707fe4465. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.c72864d9c7ee99ff8fbe9ea707fe4465.