• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国味精生产的环境生命周期评价:基于近十年清洁生产的进展。

Environmental life cycle assessment of monosodium glutamate production in China: Based on the progress of cleaner production in recent ten years.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China.

China Biotech Fermentation Industry Association, Beijing 100833, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 20;818:151706. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151706. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151706
PMID:34800459
Abstract

China is the world's leading producer of the flavor-enhancer monosodium glutamate (MSG), which is mainly produced by maize starch fermentation. Four typical scenarios (Scenario 1-Scenario 4) of MSG production from 2008 to 2019 in China were established for life cycle environmental impact assessment. Values for five midpoint environmental impact categories [primary energy demand (PED), resource depletion-water use (WU), global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), and eutrophication potential (EP)] were calculated with eFootprint based on data collected in China. The environmental impacts of producing 1 t of MSG in China in terms of PED, WU, GWP, AP, and EP were 52,800 MJ, 169,000 kg, 4590 kg CO eq, 42.1 kg SO eq, and 6.35 kg PO eq, respectively, in 2019. The life cycle of MSG from cradle to gate includes maize cultivation (high WU values), and the MSG production process (high PED, GWP, AP, and EP values). The normalization results of environmental impacts significantly decreased from S1 to S4 with the improvement in cleaner production in recent ten years. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses identified steam for MSG production, irrigation water, and ammonia volatilization during maize growth as the three main factors affecting the environment. There were obvious differences in calculated environmental impacts depending on the maize cultivation data source; i.e., data from the Ecoinvent 3.1 database, or collected data for the maize-wheat rotation system in north China or the maize monoculture system in northeastern China. This demonstrates the importance of collecting local data rather than applying database from other world regions. Compared with the use of coal and natural gas, the use of biogas to produce steam had much lower PED, WU, and GWP. Which types of alternative energy to use and the replacement ratio should be based on the actual resource reserves in each region.

摘要

中国是世界上领先的味精(MSG)生产国,味精主要通过玉米淀粉发酵生产。为了进行生命周期环境影响评估,建立了中国 2008 年至 2019 年味精生产的四个典型情景(情景 1-情景 4)。使用基于在中国收集的数据的 eFootprint,计算了五个中点环境影响类别[一次能源需求(PED)、资源枯竭-用水量(WU)、全球变暖潜能(GWP)、酸化潜能(AP)和富营养化潜能(EP)]的值。2019 年,中国每生产 1 吨味精的 PED、WU、GWP、AP 和 EP 环境影响分别为 52800 MJ、169000 kg、4590 kg COeq、42.1 kg SOeq 和 6.35 kg POeq。味精从摇篮到大门的生命周期包括玉米种植(高 WU 值)和味精生产过程(高 PED、GWP、AP 和 EP 值)。近年来,随着清洁生产水平的提高,从 S1 到 S4 的归一化环境影响显著降低。敏感性和不确定性分析确定,MSG 生产用蒸汽、灌溉用水和玉米生长期间氨挥发是影响环境的三个主要因素。由于玉米种植数据来源的不同,计算出的环境影响存在明显差异;即来自 Ecoinvent 3.1 数据库的数据,或来自中国北方玉米-小麦轮作系统或中国东北玉米单作系统的收集数据。这表明收集当地数据而不是应用其他世界区域的数据库的重要性。与使用煤炭和天然气相比,使用沼气生产蒸汽具有更低的 PED、WU 和 GWP。应根据每个地区的实际资源储量选择使用哪种类型的替代能源以及替代比例。

相似文献

1
Environmental life cycle assessment of monosodium glutamate production in China: Based on the progress of cleaner production in recent ten years.中国味精生产的环境生命周期评价:基于近十年清洁生产的进展。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 20;818:151706. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151706. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment.精准饲养作为减少猪生产系统环境足迹的工具:生命周期评估。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae225.
3
Environmental impacts and resource use of milk production on the North China Plain, based on life cycle assessment.基于生命周期评估的华北平原牛奶生产的环境影响和资源利用
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:486-495. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.259. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
4
Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from manure.纳米纤维素与粪便制沼气的环境生命周期评估
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jul 15;314:115093. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115093. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
5
Life Cycle Assessment of Plywood Manufacturing Process in China.中国胶合板制造工艺的生命周期评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 8;16(11):2037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112037.
6
Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China.将生命周期评估与农民管理实践调查相结合,研究中国北京桃生产的环境影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57190-57203. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint.分析面包生产的可持续性:能量、火用和环境足迹的生命周期评估方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(34):46949-46964. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34121-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
8
Life cycle assessment of dairy farms.奶牛场的生命周期评估
Rev Environ Health. 2016 Mar;31(1):187-90. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0037.
9
Life cycle analysis of pistachio production in Greece.希腊开心果生产的生命周期分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Oct 1;595:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.251. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
10
Sustainability of renewable fuel infrastructure: a screening LCA case study of anticorrosive graphene oxide epoxy liners in steel tanks for the storage of biodiesel and its blends.可再生燃料基础设施的可持续性:钢质生物柴油及其混合燃料储存罐中防腐氧化石墨烯环氧衬里的筛选生命周期评估案例研究
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2017 Feb 22;19(2):141-153. doi: 10.1039/c6em00552g.

引用本文的文献

1
Formulation improvement of a concentrated enzyme detergent for high-speed rail trains through life cycle assessment methodology.通过生命周期评估方法改进高铁列车浓缩酶洗涤剂的配方
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023 Mar 22:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03122-2.