• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《压力性损伤预防知识问卷》(PIPK)土耳其语版本的效度和信度

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire(PIPK).

作者信息

Bahar Arzu, Özgürbüz Nilüfer Emir

机构信息

Yuksek Ihtisas University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Fundamentals of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.

Izmir Tınaztepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Fundamentals of Nursing, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.002
PMID:34801351
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire (PIPK).

METHOD

A methodological study design was used. The instrument was translated into Turkish and back-translated into English. After evaluating the language equivalence and content validity of the scale, test-retest reliability, internal consistency and construct validity were examined. The research was conducted with a total of 324 nurses working in a state hospital and two private hospitals who volunteered to participate in the research. Number, percentage distributions, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Kappa coefficient test, Man Whitney U test and Rasch analysis were used to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

Content validity was evaluated by 11 experts in wound care and the CVI(content validity index was found 0.90. The correlation coefficient between the groups was found to be ICC 0.979 in the Kappa coefficient test performed for the reliability analysis. When the in- and out-of-fit difficulty index values of the scale were examined, it was found that the averages of these values varied between "0.72" and "1.38" values.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire (PIPK) was found to be a valid and reliable tool for intercultural studies revealing the nursing knowledge of prevention on PIs. It is recommended to conduct studies that test the validity and reliability of the scale in different samples.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估压力性损伤预防知识问卷(PIPK)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

方法

采用方法学研究设计。该工具被翻译成土耳其语,然后再回译成英语。在评估量表的语言等效性和内容效度后,检验了重测信度、内部一致性和结构效度。研究共纳入了324名在一家公立医院和两家私立医院工作且自愿参与研究的护士。使用频数、百分比分布、组内相关系数(ICC)、卡帕系数检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和拉施分析来评估数据。

结果

由11名伤口护理专家评估内容效度,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.90。在为可靠性分析进行的卡帕系数检验中,组间相关系数为ICC 0.979。检查量表的拟合优度和难度指数值时,发现这些值的平均值在“0.72”和“1.38”之间变化。

结论

压力性损伤预防知识问卷(PIPK)被发现是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于跨文化研究,揭示护士在压力性损伤预防方面的知识。建议开展在不同样本中检验该量表有效性和可靠性的研究。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire(PIPK).《压力性损伤预防知识问卷》(PIPK)土耳其语版本的效度和信度
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
2
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0.压力性损伤知识评估工具2.0土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Nov;30(4):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for Use in Turkey.《皮珀-祖尔科夫斯基压疮知识测试在土耳其的有效性和可靠性》。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024 Mar 1;37(3):1-5. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000106.
4
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0).压疮知识评估工具土耳其语修订版(PUKAT 2.0)的信度和效度。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
The validity and reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument: A methodological study.压疮生活质量量表的效度与信度:一项方法学研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Feb;32(1):102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses.西班牙语护士压力性损伤预防知识问卷的编制及心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093063.
7
Adaptation of the Gerontological Nursing Competence (GeroNursingCom) instrument to Turkish: Validity and reliability study.老年护理能力(GeroNursingCom)量表的土耳其语适应性:信度和效度研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Feb;75:103913. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103913. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
8
The attitude towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries Questionnaire: a Turkish validity and reliability study.医疗器械相关性压力性损伤问卷的态度:土耳其的效度和信度研究。
Wound Manag Prev. 2023 Nov;69(4):10-17. doi: 10.25270/wmp.22099.
9
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment scale.《护士身体评估量表使用障碍土耳其语版的信度和效度》。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2022 Feb;28(1):e12935. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12935. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
The Turkish version of the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES): Validity and reliability study.皮肤撕裂知识评估工具(OASES)的土耳其语版本:效度与信度研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Aug;21(8):e70013. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70013.

引用本文的文献

1
Pressure ulcer prevention knowledge, practices, and their associated factors among nurses in Gurage Zone Hospitals, South Ethiopia, 2021.2021年埃塞俄比亚南部古拉格地区医院护士的压疮预防知识、实践及其相关因素
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jun 20;10:20503121221105571. doi: 10.1177/20503121221105571. eCollection 2022.