Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Nov 21;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00878-0.
Efforts inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care require comprehensive understanding about the extent of and reasons for inequities. Most research on this topic examines differences in receipt of care. There is a need, particularly in the UK, for theoretically driven research that considers both receipt of care and the wider factors influencing the relationship between socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care.
This is a mixed studies narrative synthesis on socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Study searches were conducted in databases AMED, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SocIndex, and Academic Literature Search, as well as grey literature sources, in July 2020. The candidacy model of access, which describes access as a seven-stage negotiation between patients and providers, guided study searches and provided a theoretical lens through which data were synthesised.
Searches retrieved 5303 studies (after de-duplication), 29 of which were included. The synthesis generated four overarching themes, within which concepts of candidacy were evident: identifying needs; taking action; local conditions; and receiving care.
There is not a consistent or clear narrative regarding the relationship between socioeconomic position and receipt of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Attempts to address any inequities in access will require knowledge and action across many different areas. Key evidence gaps in the UK literature concern the relationship between socioeconomic position, organisational context, and assessing need for care.
努力减少在获得姑息治疗和临终关怀方面的不平等,需要全面了解不平等的程度和原因。大多数关于这个主题的研究都检查了接受护理的差异。特别是在英国,需要进行理论驱动的研究,既要考虑接受护理的情况,也要考虑影响社会经济地位与获得姑息治疗和临终关怀之间关系的更广泛因素。
这是对英国姑息治疗和临终关怀中社会经济地位和获得机会的混合研究叙述性综合。研究搜索于 2020 年 7 月在 AMED、Medline、Embase、CINAHL、SocIndex 和学术文献搜索等数据库以及灰色文献来源中进行。候选资格模型描述了访问是患者和提供者之间的七阶段谈判,该模型指导了研究搜索,并提供了一个理论视角,通过该视角对数据进行了综合。
搜索共检索到 5303 篇论文(去重后),其中 29 篇被纳入。综合分析生成了四个总体主题,其中候选概念显而易见:确定需求;采取行动;当地条件;以及接受护理。
在英国,社会经济地位与接受姑息治疗和临终关怀之间的关系没有一致或明确的叙述。解决任何获得机会方面的不平等问题都需要在许多不同领域的知识和行动。英国文献中的关键证据空白涉及社会经济地位、组织背景和评估护理需求之间的关系。