• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用移动应用程序评分量表对两款乳腺癌患者移动健康应用程序进行评估。

Evaluation of two mobile health apps for patients with breast cancer using the Mobile Application Rating Scale.

作者信息

Wright Alexander

机构信息

Institute of Healthcare Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Mhealth. 2021 Oct 20;7:60. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-20-161. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.21037/mhealth-20-161
PMID:34805391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8572758/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Screening, education about signs and symptoms, and improved access to treatment has helped reduce mortality. An understanding of the informational needs of women with breast cancer can help identify areas where mobile apps can further improve the experience of this patient group.

METHODS

Personas are a commonly used tools in user centred design to help represent particular user archetypes. Knowledge of existing informational needs and prior research using personas in breast cancer app design were used to create two different personas through which to source apps for evaluation. The Mobile Application Rating Scale, a common evaluation framework, was used to evaluate the mobile apps across several important domains.

RESULTS

Becca and OWise, two apps for breast cancer, were found through a discovery process in line with the personas described. Overall, both apps scored highly on the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Both apps had limited or no research to support their use in this patient group, and had issues related to data privacy. Becca scored particularly highly in domains related to accessibility while OWise's extensive range of features scored highly for functionality.

CONCLUSIONS

Both apps demonstrate the ability to fill an informational needs gap as evidenced in the existing literature. As with many mobile health apps, more clinical evidence and improved data handling would help support the widespread recommendation of their use in women who are undergoing or have completed treatment for breast cancer.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是全球最常被诊断出的癌症之一。筛查、关于症状体征的教育以及改善治疗途径有助于降低死亡率。了解乳腺癌女性的信息需求有助于确定移动应用程序可进一步改善该患者群体体验的领域。

方法

人物角色是用户体验设计中常用的工具,用于代表特定的用户原型。利用现有的信息需求知识以及先前在乳腺癌应用程序设计中使用人物角色的研究,创建了两个不同的人物角色,通过它们来寻找用于评估的应用程序。使用通用评估框架“移动应用程序评分量表”,在几个重要领域对移动应用程序进行评估。

结果

通过与所描述的人物角色相符的发现过程,找到了两款乳腺癌应用程序Becca和OWise。总体而言,这两款应用程序在移动应用程序评分量表上得分都很高。两款应用程序在支持其在该患者群体中使用方面的研究都很有限或没有相关研究,并且存在数据隐私问题。Becca在与可及性相关的领域得分特别高,而OWise广泛的功能在功能性方面得分很高。

结论

正如现有文献所证明的那样,这两款应用程序都显示出有能力填补信息需求缺口。与许多移动健康应用程序一样,更多的临床证据和改进的数据处理将有助于支持在正在接受或已完成乳腺癌治疗的女性中广泛推荐使用它们。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of two mobile health apps for patients with breast cancer using the Mobile Application Rating Scale.使用移动应用程序评分量表对两款乳腺癌患者移动健康应用程序进行评估。
Mhealth. 2021 Oct 20;7:60. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-20-161. eCollection 2021.
2
Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.流行的循证商业心理健康应用程序:参与度、功能、美学和信息质量分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 14;9(7):e29689. doi: 10.2196/29689.
3
Assessing Apps for Patients with Genitourinary Tumors Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS): Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估泌尿生殖系统肿瘤患者的应用程序:应用程序商店中的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 23;8(7):e17609. doi: 10.2196/17609.
4
Functionality and Quality of Asthma mHealth Apps and Their Consistency With International Guidelines: Protocol for a Systematic Search and Evaluation of Mobile Apps.哮喘移动健康应用程序的功能与质量及其与国际指南的一致性:移动应用程序系统检索与评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Feb 9;11(2):e33103. doi: 10.2196/33103.
5
Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).应用商店中针对食物过敏或不耐受的手机应用程序:使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e18339. doi: 10.2196/18339.
6
Mobile Apps for the Care Management of Chronic Kidney and End-Stage Renal Diseases: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation.移动应用程序在慢性肾脏病和终末期肾病的护理管理中的应用:应用商店中的系统检索和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 4;7(9):e12604. doi: 10.2196/12604.
7
Quality of Psychoeducational Apps for Military Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Evaluation Utilizing the Mobile Application Rating Scale.军人轻度创伤性脑损伤心理教育应用程序质量评估:利用移动应用程序评级量表进行评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):e19807. doi: 10.2196/19807.
8
Characteristics of Acute Childhood Illness Apps for Parents: Environmental Scan.家长用急性儿童疾病应用程序的特点:环境扫描。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 19;23(10):e29441. doi: 10.2196/29441.
9
German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).德国风湿病学移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)进行的评估与分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 5;7(8):e14991. doi: 10.2196/14991.
10
Multipurpose Mobile Apps for Mental Health in Chinese App Stores: Content Analysis and Quality Evaluation.中文应用商店中用于心理健康的多用途移动应用程序:内容分析和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 4;10(1):e34054. doi: 10.2196/34054.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert evaluation of mobile health apps for breast cancer management: a feature-based analysis using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).用于乳腺癌管理的移动健康应用程序的专家评估:使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)的基于特征的分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 14;25(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12838-y.
2
Developing and assessing MyTBCompanion - A tri-lingual integrated video observed therapy app for tuberculosis patient management in Malaysia and Indonesia.开发并评估MyTBCompanion——一款用于马来西亚和印度尼西亚结核病患者管理的三语综合视频观察治疗应用程序。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0320394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320394. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison of Dental Caries Risk Assessment Using CaRisk- A Simple Mobile Based Application and WHO deft, DMFT Scores: A Cross Sectional Study.使用CaRisk(一种基于手机的简单应用程序)与世界卫生组织的deft、DMFT评分进行龋齿风险评估的比较:一项横断面研究。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Jun 1;25(2):138-146. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.98075.2051. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Assessing the Quality, Privacy, and Security of Breast Cancer Apps for Arabic Speakers: Systematic Search and Review of Smartphone Apps.评估面向阿拉伯语使用者的乳腺癌应用程序的质量、隐私性和安全性:智能手机应用程序的系统检索与综述
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Jan 16;10:e48428. doi: 10.2196/48428.
5
Monitoring health as an opportunity to categorize preventative and early-treatment actions in a self-care journey: our experience with a Healthcare Magenta Scorecard.将健康监测作为在自我保健过程中对预防和早期治疗行动进行分类的契机:我们使用医疗保健品红色记分卡的经验。
Mhealth. 2023 Apr 24;9:25. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-56. eCollection 2023.
6
Menstrual Tracking Mobile App Review by Consumers and Health Care Providers: Quality Evaluations Study.消费者和医疗保健提供者对月经追踪移动应用程序的评价:质量评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 1;11:e40921. doi: 10.2196/40921.
7
Development, usability and quality evaluation of the resilient mobile application for women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性弹性移动应用程序的开发、可用性及质量评估
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 26;5(4):e708. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.708. eCollection 2022 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).应用商店中针对食物过敏或不耐受的手机应用程序:使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e18339. doi: 10.2196/18339.
2
Assessing Apps for Patients with Genitourinary Tumors Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS): Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估泌尿生殖系统肿瘤患者的应用程序:应用程序商店中的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 23;8(7):e17609. doi: 10.2196/17609.
3
Patient Experiences of Rehabilitation and the Potential for an mHealth System with Biofeedback After Breast Cancer Surgery: Qualitative Study.患者在乳腺癌手术后接受康复治疗和使用带生物反馈的移动健康系统的体验:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 29;8(7):e19721. doi: 10.2196/19721.
4
Quality Evaluation of English Mobile Applications for Gestational Diabetes: App Review using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).妊娠期糖尿病英文移动应用质量评价:使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)的应用程序评估。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021;17(2):161-168. doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200703181438.
5
User-Centred Approach to Design an Online Social Support Platform for Seniors : Identification of Users' Types and Their Requirements.以用户为中心的老年人在线社交支持平台设计方法:用户类型及其需求识别
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:1081-1085. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200328.
6
Digital support for living with and beyond gynaecological cancer.妇科癌症患者及其康复的数字化支持。
Radiography (Lond). 2020 Nov;26(4):e270-e276. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
Use of Evidence-Based Best Practices and Behavior Change Techniques in Breast Cancer Apps: Systematic Analysis.基于证据的最佳实践和行为改变技术在乳腺癌应用中的应用:系统分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 24;8(1):e14082. doi: 10.2196/14082.
8
Mobile phone applications and their use in the self-management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a qualitative study among app users and non-app users.手机应用程序及其在2型糖尿病自我管理中的应用:一项针对应用程序使用者和非使用者的定性研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019 Oct 16;11:84. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0480-4. eCollection 2019.
9
Mobile Apps for the Care Management of Chronic Kidney and End-Stage Renal Diseases: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation.移动应用程序在慢性肾脏病和终末期肾病的护理管理中的应用:应用商店中的系统检索和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 4;7(9):e12604. doi: 10.2196/12604.
10
Differences in perception of breast cancer treatment between patients, physicians, and nurses and unmet information needs in Japan.日本的患者、医生和护士对乳腺癌治疗的看法存在差异,以及信息需求未得到满足。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2331-2338. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05029-z. Epub 2019 Sep 3.