• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估胃癌胃切除术的质量与完整性:对来自公共领域手术视频的回顾

Evaluating quality and completeness of gastrectomy for gastric cancer: review of surgical videos from the public domain.

作者信息

Dixon Matthew, Palter Vanessa, Brar Savtaj, Coburn Natalie

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 25;6:57. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.01. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.21037/tgh.2020.01.01
PMID:34805579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8573372/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

YouTube has provided a forum to share surgical videos in the public domain which may be used for education. The quality of surgery and accompanying educational material is unknown. YouTube videos of gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (D2-LND) for gastric cancer were evaluated for quality and completeness.

METHODS

YouTube was searched using the terms "D2 lymphadenectomy" and "Gastric Cancer" for open and laparoscopic videos. The Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgical Society (KLASS) outlined 22 steps that define quality and completeness of D2-LND. These guidelines were used to score D2-LND for each video. Four physician reviewers independently scored each surgical video. Scores were compared using Student's -test.

RESULTS

Ten laparoscopic and 10 open surgery videos were assessed. Each video was scored for quality and completeness and assigned a score out of 22. Mean score for open D2-LND was 15 (95% CI: 12.54-17.46). Mean score for laparoscopic D2-LND was 15.4 (95% CI: 14.34-16.46; P=0.77). The most consistently performed steps were the dissection of lymph node stations 1, 3, 4 and 5. The most commonly omitted steps were the dissection of lymph node station 6: exposure and identification of the lowest anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein; removal of the prepancreatic soft tissues above the lowest anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein; removal of the prepancreatic soft tissues above the level of the bifurcation of the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein and right gastroepiploic vein.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide range of quality and completeness of D2-LND videos. On average, D2-LND videos are only two-thirds complete.

摘要

背景

YouTube提供了一个在公共领域分享手术视频的平台,这些视频可用于教育。手术质量及配套教育材料的质量尚不清楚。对YouTube上有关胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术(D2-LND)的胃切除术视频的质量和完整性进行了评估。

方法

在YouTube上使用“D2淋巴结清扫术”和“胃癌”搜索开放手术和腹腔镜手术视频。韩国腹腔镜胃肠外科学会(KLASS)列出了22个步骤,用于定义D2-LND的质量和完整性。这些指南用于对每个视频的D2-LND进行评分。四位医生评审员独立对每个手术视频进行评分。使用学生t检验比较评分。

结果

评估了10个腹腔镜手术视频和10个开放手术视频。每个视频都进行了质量和完整性评分,并给出了22分制的分数。开放D2-LND的平均得分为15分(95%可信区间:12.54-17.46)。腹腔镜D2-LND的平均得分为15.4分(95%可信区间:14.34-16.46;P=0.77)。最常执行的步骤是第1、3、4和5组淋巴结的清扫。最常遗漏的步骤是第6组淋巴结的清扫:暴露和识别最低的胰十二指肠上前静脉;切除最低的胰十二指肠上前静脉上方的胰前软组织;切除胰十二指肠上前静脉和右胃网膜静脉分叉水平上方的胰前软组织。

结论

D2-LND视频的质量和完整性差异很大。平均而言,D2-LND视频仅完成了三分之二。

相似文献

1
Evaluating quality and completeness of gastrectomy for gastric cancer: review of surgical videos from the public domain.评估胃癌胃切除术的质量与完整性:对来自公共领域手术视频的回顾
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 25;6:57. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.01. eCollection 2021.
2
Standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and surgical quality control (KLASS-02-QC): a prospective, observational, multicenter study [NCT01283893].D2 淋巴结清扫术的标准化和手术质量控制(KLASS-02-QC):一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究 [NCT01283893]。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 19;14:209. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-209.
3
Concerns of quality, utility, and reliability of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in public video sharing platform.公共视频分享平台上关于腹腔镜胃癌切除术的质量、实用性和可靠性的担忧。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(5):196. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.78.
4
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision for advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜完整系膜切除D2淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的短期疗效
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):5138-5139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4847-4. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Factors affecting the quality of laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a cohort study from two randomized controlled trials.影响胃癌腹腔镜 D2 淋巴结清扫质量的因素:来自两项随机对照试验的队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1249-1256. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000290.
6
Surgeon Quality Control and Standardization of D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (KLASS-02-QC).胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术的外科医师质量控制和标准化:一项前瞻性多中心观察研究(KLASS-02-QC)。
Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):315-324. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003883.
7
Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.比较腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术D1+与D2淋巴结清扫的短期疗效。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 May;9(2):116-21. doi: 10.1111/ases.12269. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Pure single-incision laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a novel approach to 11p lymph node dissection (midpancreas mobilization).单纯单切口腹腔镜胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术:一种11p淋巴结清扫(胰腺中段游离)的新方法。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Nov;87(5):279-83. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.5.279. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
9
New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®?胃癌腹腔镜胃切除术的新学习领域:YouTube® 还是 WebSurg®?
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;18(1):129-135. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_300_20.
10
Superior pancreatic lymphadenectomy with portal vein priority posterior common hepatic artery approach in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.腹腔镜根治性胃切除术中门静脉优先后肝总动脉入路的胰上淋巴结清扫术
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Feb 26;10(6):1834-1842. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i6.1834.

引用本文的文献

1
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Social media in surgery: evolving role in research communication and beyond.社交媒体在外科领域的应用:在研究传播及其他领域中的不断演变的角色。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):505-520. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02135-7. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
3
Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.腹腔镜D2淋巴结清扫术式全胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的疗效:KLASS-02多中心随机对照临床试验方案
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 5;15:355. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1365-z.
4
Teaching surgical skills using video internet communication in a resource-limited setting.在资源有限的情况下,使用视频互联网通讯进行外科技能教学。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):127-131. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182964b8c.
5
Defining surgical quality in gastric cancer: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness study.界定胃癌手术质量:一项兰德公司/加州大学洛杉矶分校适用性研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug;217(2):347-57.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.067. Epub 2013 May 8.
6
YouTube: a good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy?YouTube:小儿扁桃体切除术的良好信息来源?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;77(6):972-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
7
YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease.YouTube 作为肾结石疾病信息的来源。
Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):558-62. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
8
Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial.胃癌的外科治疗:随机全国性荷兰 D1D2 试验的 15 年随访结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 May;11(5):439-49. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
9
YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic.YouTube 作为甲型 H1N1 流感大流行信息源。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007.
10
Surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer: Japanese perspective.进展期胃癌的外科治疗:日本视角
Dig Surg. 2007;24(2):101-7. doi: 10.1159/000101896. Epub 2007 Apr 19.