Gan Daniel Z Q, McGillivray Lauren, Han Jin, Christensen Helen, Torok Michelle
Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 4;3:764079. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.764079. eCollection 2021.
Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) present a promising way to address gaps in mental health service provision. However, the relationship between user engagement and outcomes in the context of these interventions has not been established. This study addressed the current state of evidence on the relationship between engagement with DMHIs and mental health outcomes. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EmBASE databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2021. Original or secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they examined the relationship between DMHI engagement and post-intervention outcome(s). Thirty-five studies were eligible for inclusion in the narrative review and 25 studies had sufficient data for meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses indicated that greater engagement was significantly associated with post-intervention mental health improvements, regardless of whether this relationship was explored using correlational [ = 0.24, 95% CI (0.17, 0.32), = 6.29, < 0.001] or between-groups designs [Hedges' = 0.40, 95% CI (0.097, 0.705), = 0.010]. This association was also consistent regardless of intervention type (unguided/guided), diagnostic status, or mental health condition targeted. This is the first review providing empirical evidence that engagement with DMHIs is associated with therapeutic gains. Implications and future directions are discussed. PROSPERO, identifier: CRD 42020184706.
数字心理健康干预措施(DMHIs)为解决心理健康服务提供方面的差距提供了一种很有前景的方法。然而,在这些干预措施的背景下,用户参与度与结果之间的关系尚未确立。本研究探讨了关于参与DMHIs与心理健康结果之间关系的现有证据状况。检索了MEDLINE、PsycINFO和EmBASE数据库,检索时间从数据库创建至2021年8月1日。如果随机对照试验(RCTs)的原始分析或二次分析研究了DMHI参与度与干预后结果之间的关系,则将其纳入。35项研究符合纳入叙述性综述的条件,25项研究有足够的数据进行荟萃分析。随机效应荟萃分析表明,更高的参与度与干预后的心理健康改善显著相关,无论这种关系是使用相关性分析[ = 0.24,95%置信区间(0.17,0.32), = 6.29, < 0.001]还是组间设计[Hedges' = 0.40,95%置信区间(0.097,0.705), = 0.010]进行探讨。无论干预类型(无指导/有指导)、诊断状态或所针对的心理健康状况如何,这种关联都是一致的。这是第一项提供实证证据表明参与DMHIs与治疗效果相关的综述。文中讨论了其意义和未来方向。PROSPERO标识符:CRD 42020184706。