• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为博士后研究员提供结构化的专业发展课程可带来公认的知识增长。

A structured professional development curriculum for postdoctoral fellows leads to recognized knowledge growth.

机构信息

Cell & Developmental Biology Department, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 22;16(11):e0260212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260212. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260212
PMID:34807941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608334/
Abstract

Postdoctoral training enables research independence and professional readiness. National reports have emphasized professional development as a critical component of this training period. In response, many institutions are establishing transferable skills training workshops for postdocs; however, the lack of structured programs and an absence of methods to assess outcomes beyond participant satisfaction surveys are critical gaps in postdoctoral training. To address these shortcomings, we took the approach of structured programming and developed a method for controlled assessment of outcomes. Our program You3 (You, Your Team, Your Project), co-designed by postdoctoral fellows, focused on discussing specific management and leadership skills agnostic of ultimate career path(s) in a structured manner. We then measured outcomes in a controlled manner, by systematically comparing perceived knowledge and growth as indicators of awareness and confidence in participants against that of non-participants as the control group. You3 participants self-rated greater growth in targeted competencies compared to non-participants independent of the number of years of training. This growth was shown by multiple criteria including self-reporting and associative analysis. Correspondingly, You3 participants reported greater knowledge in 75% of the modules when compared to controls. These data indicate that structured learning, where postdocs commit to a curriculum via a cohort-structure, leads to positive outcomes and provides a framework for programs to assess outcomes in a rigorous manner.

摘要

博士后培训使研究人员具备独立性和专业素养。国家报告强调,专业发展是培训期间的关键组成部分。有鉴于此,许多机构正在为博士后设立可转移技能培训研讨会;然而,缺乏结构化的项目和方法来评估除参与者满意度调查之外的结果,这是博士后培训的关键缺陷。为了解决这些不足,我们采取了结构化编程的方法,并开发了一种评估结果的方法。我们的项目 You3(你、你的团队、你的项目)由博士后研究员共同设计,专注于以结构化的方式讨论特定的管理和领导技能,而不考虑最终的职业道路。然后,我们通过系统地比较参与者和对照组(非参与者)的感知知识和增长,以有控制的方式衡量结果,将感知知识和增长作为参与者意识和信心的指标。You3 的参与者自我评估在目标能力方面的增长比非参与者更大,而与培训年限无关。这种增长是通过多种标准包括自我报告和关联分析得出的。相应地,与对照组相比,You3 的参与者在 75%的模块中报告了更多的知识。这些数据表明,通过队列结构让博士后参与课程的结构化学习会带来积极的结果,并为项目提供了一种严格评估结果的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/3a3bbd7aa5ea/pone.0260212.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/5a4e9e48370c/pone.0260212.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/b5eb58c95255/pone.0260212.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/939819150587/pone.0260212.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/b051f3c1a5bd/pone.0260212.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/3a3bbd7aa5ea/pone.0260212.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/5a4e9e48370c/pone.0260212.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/b5eb58c95255/pone.0260212.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/939819150587/pone.0260212.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/b051f3c1a5bd/pone.0260212.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/8608334/3a3bbd7aa5ea/pone.0260212.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A structured professional development curriculum for postdoctoral fellows leads to recognized knowledge growth.为博士后研究员提供结构化的专业发展课程可带来公认的知识增长。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 22;16(11):e0260212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260212. eCollection 2021.
2
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
3
Report of the 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.2018-2019 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7595. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7595.
4
Faculty perceptions and knowledge of career development of trainees in biomedical science: What do we (think we) know?教师对生物医学科学受训者职业发展的看法和认知:我们(认为我们)知道什么?
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0210189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210189. eCollection 2019.
5
Universities without Walls: A Blended Delivery Approach to Training the Next Generation of HIV Researchers in Canada.无墙大学:加拿大培养下一代 HIV 研究人员的混合式交付方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 15;17(12):4265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124265.
6
Problem-based learning at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine: self-assessment of performance in postdoctoral training.哈佛牙医学院基于问题的学习:博士后培训中表现的自我评估
J Dent Educ. 2007 Aug;71(8):1080-9.
7
Alumni perspectives on career preparation during a postdoctoral training program: a qualitative study.博士后培训项目中校友对职业准备的看法:一项定性研究。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):ar1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0102. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
8
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
9
Career planning courses increase career readiness of graduate and postdoctoral trainees.职业规划课程提高研究生和博士后受训者的职业准备程度。
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 13;9:1230. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26025.2. eCollection 2020.
10
The Society of Gynecologic Oncology wellness curriculum pilot: A groundbreaking initiative for fellowship training.妇科肿瘤学学会健康课程试点: fellowship 培训的开创性举措。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):710-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The comprehensive researcher development framework (CRDF): Core learning outcomes for research training.综合研究人员发展框架(CRDF):研究培训的核心学习成果。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332587. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing structural mentoring barriers in postdoctoral training: a qualitative study.解决博士后培训中的结构性指导障碍:一项定性研究。
Stud Grad Postdr Educ. 2025 Jan 2;16(1). doi: 10.1108/sgpe-04-2023-0033. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
A Coaching-Based Leadership Program for Women Postdoctoral Fellows at the National Cancer Institute that Cultivates Self-confidence and Persistence in STEMM.

本文引用的文献

1
Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study.研究生和博士后学习者在职业与专业技能发展中的远程学习障碍与机遇:一项案例研究
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Mar 31;22(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2451. eCollection 2021.
2
Postdocs in crisis: science cannot risk losing the next generation.博士后陷入危机:科学界不能冒险失去下一代。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7824):160. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02541-9.
3
United States National Postdoc Survey results and the interaction of gender, career choice and mentor impact.
国家癌症研究所面向女性博士后研究员的基于辅导的领导力项目,培养 STEMM 领域的自信和坚持精神。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Oct;39(5):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02466-1. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Postdoctoral T32 training is correlated with obtaining an academic primarily research faculty position.博士后 T32 培训与获得主要从事研究的学术教职岗位相关。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0303792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303792. eCollection 2024.
5
A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers.一个国家专业发展计划填补了博士后研究人员的导师空缺。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0275767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275767. eCollection 2023.
6
Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study.研究生和博士后学习者在职业与专业技能发展中的远程学习障碍与机遇:一项案例研究
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Mar 31;22(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2451. eCollection 2021.
美国博士后调查结果以及性别、职业选择和导师影响的相互作用。
Elife. 2018 Dec 18;7:e40189. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40189.
4
A Model for Postdoctoral Education That Promotes Minority and Majority Success in the Biomedical Sciences.促进少数族裔和多数族裔在生物医学科学中取得成功的博士后教育模式。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Winter;16(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-03-0051.
5
The future of graduate and postdoctoral training in the biosciences.生物科学领域研究生和博士后培训的未来。
Elife. 2017 Oct 19;6:e32715. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32715.
6
An evidence-based evaluation of transferrable skills and job satisfaction for science PhDs.对理科博士可转移技能和工作满意度的循证评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0185023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185023. eCollection 2017.
7
"I Can't Get No Satisfaction": Measuring Student Satisfaction in the Age of a Consumerist Higher Education.《无法获得满足感:在消费主义高等教育时代衡量学生满意度》
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 8;8:980. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00980. eCollection 2017.
8
The impact of postdoctoral training on early careers in biomedicine.博士后培训对生物医学早期职业生涯的影响。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 10;35(1):90-94. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3766.
9
Enhancing Graduate and Postdoctoral Education To Create a Sustainable Biomedical Workforce.加强研究生和博士后教育以打造可持续的生物医学劳动力队伍。
Hum Gene Ther. 2016 Nov;27(11):871-879. doi: 10.1089/hum.2016.154.
10
SCIENTIFIC WORKFORCE. Why pursue the postdoc path?科研人员。为何选择博士后之路?
Science. 2016 May 6;352(6286):663-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2061.