• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics.制造利益冲突:烟草业策略的历史。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jan;102(1):63-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300292. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
2
The "father of stress" meets "big tobacco": Hans Selye and the tobacco industry.“压力之父”与“大烟草”会面:汉斯·塞利与烟草业。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Mar;101(3):411-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.177634. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris' efforts to influence a leading scientist.追踪恩斯特·L·温德:菲利普·莫里斯公司40年影响一位顶尖科学家的努力。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Aug;57(8):571-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.8.571.
4
Lessons from the history of tobacco harm reduction: The National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program and the "less hazardous cigarette".烟草危害降低历史的教训:美国国家癌症研究所的吸烟与健康项目及“低危害香烟”
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Oct;7(5):779-89. doi: 10.1080/14622200500262584.
5
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中,关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
6
The cigarette controversy.香烟争议
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1070-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0912.
7
Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany.烟草行业对德国科学及科学家的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jan;96(1):20-32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061507. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
8
The rise and fall of tobacco control media campaigns, 1967 2006.1967 - 2006年烟草控制媒体宣传活动的兴衰
Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1383-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.097006. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
9
Science, industry, and tobacco harm reduction: a case study of tobacco industry scientists' involvement in the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program, 1964-1980.科学、产业与烟草危害降低:以1964年至1980年烟草行业科学家参与美国国家癌症研究所吸烟与健康项目为例
Public Health Rep. 2005 May-Jun;120(3):338-49. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000320.
10
Scientific analysis of second-hand smoke by the tobacco industry, 1929-1972.烟草行业对二手烟的科学分析,1929年至1972年
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Aug;7(4):591-612. doi: 10.1080/14622200500185082.

引用本文的文献

1
Industry sponsorship bias in randomized controlled trials of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a meta-research study based on the 2023 Brazilian guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia in adults.成人失眠数字认知行为疗法随机对照试验中的行业赞助偏差:一项基于2023年巴西成人失眠诊断与治疗指南的元研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1600767. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1600767. eCollection 2025.
2
Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) Guidance for the Management of Electronic Cigarette Use (Vaping) in Adolescents and Adults.澳大利亚和新西兰胸科协会(TSANZ)关于青少年和成年人电子烟使用(雾化)管理的指南。
Respirology. 2025 Jul;30(7):605-622. doi: 10.1111/resp.70066. Epub 2025 May 28.
3
When Facts Become Forbidden: The Past and Present History of Scientific Censorship.当事实成为禁忌:科学审查的过去与现在的历史
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2025 Mar;10(3):402-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2025.02.003. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Lest a Smoky Haze of Doubt Suffocate Progress toward Better Pulse Oximeters.以免怀疑的烟雾笼罩窒息了朝着更好的脉搏血氧仪发展的进程。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Mar;22(3):322-324. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1213ED.
5
Tobacco Industry Engagement in the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee E-Cigarettes Inquiry.烟草行业参与下议院科学与技术特别委员会电子烟调查。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8341. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8341. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
Letter to the editor regarding: "Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?".致编辑的信:关于“质疑因果关系声明中未经证实的假设:燃气灶具会增加儿童患哮喘的风险吗?”
Glob Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 19;8:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100172. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
The opioid industry's use of scientific evidence to advance claims about prescription opioid safety and effectiveness.阿片类药物行业利用科学证据来推进有关处方阿片类药物安全性和有效性的主张。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Oct 24;2(10):qxae119. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae119. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Activity of the Tobacco Industry in Research and Scientific Literature.烟草行业在研究及科学文献方面的活动。
Tob Use Insights. 2024 Aug 19;17:1179173X241271566. doi: 10.1177/1179173X241271566. eCollection 2024.
9
Commercial Tobacco and Nicotine Industry-Funded Research Has No Place in SRNT and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.商业烟草和尼古丁行业资助的研究在烟草研究学会(SRNT)以及《尼古丁与烟草研究》中没有立足之地。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jul 22;26(8):963-965. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae109.
10
Vaping: Public Health, Social Media, and Toxicity.电子烟:公共卫生、社交媒体与毒性
Online J Public Health Inform. 2024 Apr 11;16:e53245. doi: 10.2196/53245.

本文引用的文献

1
The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?忽视历史的危害:大烟草公司行为不端,数百万人丧生。食品巨头与之有多大相似之处呢?
Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):259-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x.
2
The cigarette controversy.香烟争议
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1070-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0912.
3
"Everyone knew but no one had proof": tobacco industry use of medical history expertise in US courts, 1990-2002.“人人皆知却无人能证”:1990 - 2002年美国法庭上烟草行业对医学史专业知识的运用
Tob Control. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv117-25. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009928.
4
Historians' testimony on "common knowledge" of the risks of tobacco use: a review and analysis of experts testifying on behalf of cigarette manufacturers in civil litigation.历史学家关于烟草使用风险“常识”的证词:对在民事诉讼中代表香烟制造商作证的专家的回顾与分析。
Tob Control. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv107-16. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.014076.
5
Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers.引发利益冲突的医疗行业行为:针对学术医疗中心的一项政策提案
JAMA. 2006 Jan 25;295(4):429-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.4.429.
6
Blaming tobacco's victims.指责烟草受害者。
Tob Control. 2002 Sep;11(3):167-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.167.
7
Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking.烟草行业的虚假承诺及其对消费者关于吸烟健康风险的错误认知的影响。
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I110-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i110.
8
Understanding financial conflicts of interest.理解经济利益冲突。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):573-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308193290812.

制造利益冲突:烟草业策略的历史。

Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics.

机构信息

Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2012 Jan;102(1):63-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300292. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300292
PMID:22095331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3490543/
Abstract

Confronted by compelling peer-reviewed scientific evidence of the harms of smoking, the tobacco industry, beginning in the 1950s, used sophisticated public relations approaches to undermine and distort the emerging science. The industry campaign worked to create a scientific controversy through a program that depended on the creation of industry-academic conflicts of interest. This strategy of producing scientific uncertainty undercut public health efforts and regulatory interventions designed to reduce the harms of smoking. A number of industries have subsequently followed this approach to disrupting normative science. Claims of scientific uncertainty and lack of proof also lead to the assertion of individual responsibility for industrially produced health risks.

摘要

面对吸烟危害的有力同行评审科学证据,烟草业从 20 世纪 50 年代开始,采用复杂的公共关系手段来破坏和歪曲新兴科学。该行业的运动通过一个依赖于制造行业-学术利益冲突的计划,努力制造科学争议。这种制造科学不确定性的策略破坏了旨在减少吸烟危害的公共卫生努力和监管干预。随后,许多行业都采用了这种扰乱规范科学的方法。对科学不确定性和缺乏证据的主张也导致了对工业生产的健康风险应由个人负责的断言。