Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Solnavägen 4, SE-11364 Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):321-329. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3860. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
Objectives The aims of this position paper are to (i) summarize research on precarious employment (PE) in the context of occupational health; (ii) develop a theoretical framework that distinguishes PE from related concepts and delineates important contextual factors; and (iii) identify key methodological challenges and directions for future research on PE and health. Methods This position paper is the result of a working group consisting of researchers from the EU, Turkey and the USA, who have discussed the issue over the course of six months (October 2018-April 2019), meeting both online and face-to-face on several occasions. Results The lack of a common theoretical framework of PE hinders it from becoming an established part of occupational and public health research. There are also issues regarding operationalization in surveys and registers. Further, previous research on PE and health suffers from methodological limitations including inadequate study designs and biased assessments of exposure and outcomes. PE is highly dependent on contextual factors and cross-country comparison has proven very difficult. We also point to the uneven social distribution of PE, ie, higher prevalence among women, immigrants, young and low educated. We propose a theoretical framework for understanding precarious employment as a multidimensional construct. Conclusions A generally accepted multidimensional definition of PE should be the highest priority. Future studies would benefit from improved exposure assessment, temporal resolution, and accounting for confounders, as well as testing possible mechanisms, eg, by adopting multi-level and intersectional analytical approaches in order to understand the complexity of PE and its relation to health.
目的 本立场文件的目的是:(i) 总结职业健康背景下的不稳定就业 (PE) 研究;(ii) 制定一个理论框架,区分 PE 与相关概念,并划定重要的背景因素;(iii) 确定 PE 与健康研究的关键方法学挑战和未来研究方向。
方法 本立场文件是由来自欧盟、土耳其和美国的研究人员组成的工作组的成果,他们在 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 4 月期间通过多次在线和面对面会议讨论了这个问题,历时六个月。
结果 缺乏对 PE 的共同理论框架阻碍了它成为职业和公共卫生研究的一个既定部分。在调查和登记中也存在操作化问题。此外,以前关于 PE 和健康的研究存在方法学限制,包括设计不合理和对暴露和结果的评估有偏差。PE 高度依赖于背景因素,跨国比较非常困难。我们还指出了 PE 的社会分配不均,即女性、移民、年轻人和受教育程度低的人患病率更高。我们提出了一个理解不稳定就业的理论框架,将其视为一个多维结构。
结论 应优先考虑普遍接受的多维不稳定就业定义。未来的研究将受益于改善暴露评估、时间分辨率,并考虑混杂因素,以及检验可能的机制,例如通过采用多层次和交叉分析方法,以了解 PE 的复杂性及其与健康的关系。