Cumming Jacqueline, Middleton Lesley, Silwal Pushkar, Tenbensel Tim
Consultant Advisor, Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora - Health Services Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Senior Lecturer, School of Health, Faculty of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Nov 8;21(4):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5679. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
Ten years ago, progress towards integrated care in Aotearoa New Zealand was characterised as slow. Since then, there has been a patchwork of practices occurring under the broad umbrella of integrated care. These include: collective planning approaches (i.e., alliancing), agreed pathways of care, chronic care management initiatives, shared patient information systems, co-located centres and indigenous models of holistic care (e.g., Whānau Ora).
Although integrated care is often mentioned in national policy documents, implementation has been left to regional and local decision making, and very few initiatives have spread beyond their initial locations.
System incentives that preserve organisational "sovereignty" and path-dependent funding have slowed progress towards more integrated care in some areas. There is some evidence about specific initiatives and their impact, but it is difficult to discern significant trends and commonalities around the country.
In the last ten years, the broad range of initiatives designed to achieve integrated care has absorbed regional and local attention and produced some evidence of progress, but the national picture of change is mixed.
十年前,新西兰在综合医疗服务方面的进展被认为较为缓慢。从那时起,在综合医疗服务这一广泛框架下出现了各种不同的做法。这些做法包括:集体规划方法(即结成联盟)、商定的护理路径、慢性病管理举措、共享患者信息系统、联合中心以及整体护理的本土模式(如家庭健康模式)。
尽管国家政策文件中经常提及综合医疗服务,但实施工作留给了地区和地方决策,很少有举措能在其最初实施地点之外推广。
维护组织“主权”的系统激励措施和依赖路径的资金投入在某些领域减缓了向更综合医疗服务发展的进程。有一些关于具体举措及其影响的证据,但很难在全国范围内辨别出显著趋势和共性。
在过去十年中,旨在实现综合医疗服务的一系列广泛举措吸引了地区和地方的关注,并产生了一些进展的证据,但全国范围内的变革情况参差不齐。