Bampidis Vasileios, Azimonti Giovanna, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Christensen Henrik, Fašmon Durjava Mojca, Kouba Maryline, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Marcon Francesca, Mayo Baltasar, Pechová Alena, Petkova Mariana, Ramos Fernando, Sanz Yolanda, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen Ruud, Brantom Paul, Chesson Andrew, Westendorf Johannes, Manini Paola, Pizzo Fabiola, Dusemund Birgit
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 19;19(11):e06891. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6891. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of expressed sweet orange oil and its fractions obtained from the fruit peels of (L.) Osbeck, when used as sensory additives (flavourings) in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The presence of perillaldehyde was identified as a source of potential concern. However, in target species fed citrus by-products as part of daily feed, the use of the expressed orange oil and its fractions was not expected to increase the exposure to perillaldehyde to a relevant extent (< 10%). For dogs, cats, ornamental fish and ornamental birds not normally exposed to citrus by-products, no conclusion can be drawn. For the other species, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additives under assessment are safe at the maximum proposed use levels in complete feed. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use in water for drinking is safe provided that the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the daily amount that is considered safe when consumed via feed. No concerns for consumer safety were identified following the use of the additives up to the maximum proposed use level in feed. The additives under assessment should be considered as irritants to skin and eyes, and as skin and respiratory sensitisers. The use of the additives under the proposed conditions of use in animal feed was not expected to pose a risk for the environment. Expressed orange oil and its fractions were recognised to flavour food. Since their function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
应欧盟委员会的要求,动物饲料添加剂和产品或物质专家小组(FEEDAP)被要求就压榨甜橙油及其从芸香科柑橘属植物(L.)Osbeck的果皮中获得的馏分用作所有动物种类饲料和饮用水的感官添加剂(调味剂)的安全性和有效性发表科学意见。紫苏醛的存在被确定为一个潜在的关注来源。然而,在作为日常饲料一部分喂食柑橘副产品的目标物种中,使用压榨橙油及其馏分预计不会使紫苏醛的暴露量增加到相关程度(<10%)。对于通常不接触柑橘副产品的狗、猫、观赏鱼和观赏鸟,无法得出结论。对于其他物种,FEEDAP小组得出结论,所评估的添加剂在全价饲料中建议的最大使用水平下是安全的。FEEDAP小组认为,只要添加剂的每日总摄入量不超过通过饲料摄入时被认为安全的每日量,在饮用水中的使用就是安全的。在饲料中使用添加剂直至建议的最大使用水平后,未发现对消费者安全的担忧。所评估的添加剂应被视为对皮肤和眼睛有刺激性,以及皮肤和呼吸道致敏剂。在所提议的动物饲料使用条件下使用这些添加剂预计不会对环境构成风险。压榨橙油及其馏分被认可用于食品调味。由于它们在饲料中的功能与在食品中的基本相同,因此无需进一步证明其有效性。