Alagna Laura, Meessen Jennifer M T A, Bellani Giacomo, Albiero Daniela, Caironi Pietro, Principale Irene, Vivona Luigi, Grasselli Giacomo, Motta Francesca, Agnelli Nicolò M, Parrini Vieri, Romagnoli Stefano, Keim Roberto, Di Marzo Capozzi Francesca, Taccone Fabio S, Taccone Walter, Bottazzi Barbara, Bandera Alessandra, Cortegiani Andrea, Latini Roberto
Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute for Pharmacological Research Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy.
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00952-z.
The role of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) during sepsis is controversial, as different trials on IVIG have observed inconsistent survival benefits. We aimed to elucidate the possible association and clinical significance between circulating levels of immunoglobulins.
In a subset of 956 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock of the multicentre, open-label RCT ALBIOS, venous blood samples were serially collected 1, 2, and 7 days after enrolment (or at ICU discharge, whichever came first). IgA, IgG and IgM concentrations were assayed in all patients on day 1 and in a subgroup of 150 patients on days 2 and 7. Ig concentrations were measured employing a turbidimetric assay, OSR61171 system.
IgA on day 1 had a significant predictive value for both 28-day and 90-day mortality (28-day mortality, HR: 1.50 (95% CI 1.18-1.92); 90-day mortality, HR: 1.54 (95% CI 1.25-1.91)). IgG, but not IgM, on day 1 showed similar results for 28-day (HR 1.83 (95% CI 1.33-2.51) and 90-day mortality HR: 1.66 (95% CI 1.23-2.25)). In addition, lower levels of IgG but not of IgA and IgM, at day 1 were associated with significantly higher risk of secondary infections (533 [406-772] vs 600 [452-842] mg/dL, median [Q1-Q3], p = 0.007).
In the largest cohort study of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, we found that high levels of IgA and IgG on the first day of diagnosis were associated with a decreased 90-day survival. No association was found between IgM levels and survival. As such, the assessment of endogenous immunoglobulins could be a useful tool to identify septic patients at high risk of mortality. Trial registration #NCT00707122, Clinicaltrial.gov, registered 30 June 2008.
静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)在脓毒症中的作用存在争议,因为不同的IVIG试验观察到的生存获益并不一致。我们旨在阐明免疫球蛋白循环水平之间可能的关联及其临床意义。
在多中心、开放标签随机对照试验ALBIOS的956例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者亚组中,在入组后1天、2天和7天(或在ICU出院时,以先到者为准)连续采集静脉血样本。在第1天对所有患者以及在第2天和第7天对150例患者亚组测定IgA、IgG和IgM浓度。采用比浊法OSR61171系统测量Ig浓度。
第1天的IgA对28天和90天死亡率均具有显著预测价值(28天死亡率,HR:1.50(95%CI 1.18 - 1.92);90天死亡率,HR:1.54(95%CI 1.25 - 1.91))。第1天的IgG而非IgM对28天(HR 1.83(95%CI 1.33 - 2.51))和90天死亡率(HR:1.66(95%CI 1.23 - 2.25))显示出类似结果。此外,第1天较低的IgG水平而非IgA和IgM水平与继发感染的风险显著升高相关(533[406 - 772]对600[452 - 842]mg/dL,中位数[Q1 - Q3],p = 0.007)。
在这项针对严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的最大队列研究中,我们发现诊断第一天的高水平IgA和IgG与90天生存率降低相关。未发现IgM水平与生存率之间存在关联。因此,评估内源性免疫球蛋白可能是识别高死亡风险脓毒症患者的有用工具。试验注册号#NCT00707122,Clinicaltrial.gov,2008年6月30日注册。