• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际乳腺癌 Ki67 工作组自动 Ki67 评分指南的独立临床验证。

Independent Clinical Validation of the Automated Ki67 Scoring Guideline from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Biomolecules. 2021 Oct 30;11(11):1612. doi: 10.3390/biom11111612.

DOI:10.3390/biom11111612
PMID:34827609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8615770/
Abstract

Ki67 is an important biomarker with prognostic and potential predictive value in breast cancer. However, the lack of standardization hinders its clinical applicability. In this study, we aimed to investigate the reproducibility among pathologists following the guidelines of the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) for Ki67 scoring and to evaluate the prognostic potential of this platform in an independent cohort. Four algorithms were independently built by four pathologists based on our study cohort using an open-source digital image analysis (DIA) platform (QuPath) following the detailed guideline of the IKWG. The algorithms were applied on an ER+ breast cancer study cohort of 157 patients with 15 years of follow-up. The reference Ki67 score was obtained by a DIA algorithm trained on a subset of the study cohort. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure reproducibility. High interobserver reliability was reached with an ICC of 0.938 (CI: 0.920-0.952) among the algorithms and the reference standard. Comparing each machine-read score against relapse-free survival, the hazard ratios were similar (2.593-4.165) and showed independent prognostic potential ( ≤ 0.018, for all comparisons). In conclusion, we demonstrate high reproducibility and independent prognostic potential using the IKWG DIA instructions to score Ki67 in breast cancer. A prospective study is needed to assess the clinical utility of the IKWG DIA Ki67 instructions.

摘要

Ki67 是乳腺癌中具有重要预后和潜在预测价值的生物标志物。然而,缺乏标准化会阻碍其临床应用。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究病理学家在遵循国际乳腺癌 Ki67 工作组(IKWG)Ki67 评分指南时的可重复性,并评估该平台在独立队列中的预后潜力。四位病理学家根据我们的研究队列,使用开源数字图像分析(DIA)平台(QuPath),独立地根据 IKWG 的详细指南为四位病理学家建立了四个算法。该算法应用于一个 ER+乳腺癌研究队列,该队列包含 157 例患者,随访时间为 15 年。通过在研究队列的一个子集上训练的 DIA 算法获得参考 Ki67 评分。采用组内相关系数(ICC)来衡量可重复性。算法之间的 ICC 为 0.938(置信区间:0.920-0.952),观察者之间的可靠性很高。将每个机器读取的评分与无复发生存率进行比较,危险比相似(2.593-4.165),且具有独立的预后潜力(≤0.018,所有比较)。总之,我们使用 IKWG DIA 指南来对乳腺癌中的 Ki67 进行评分,证明了其具有很高的可重复性和独立的预后潜力。需要进行前瞻性研究来评估 IKWG DIA Ki67 指南的临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/463870208cf5/biomolecules-11-01612-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/ad1c6c8a5d15/biomolecules-11-01612-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/41f8dfd3cdb9/biomolecules-11-01612-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/a67cf9a6a8c5/biomolecules-11-01612-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/463870208cf5/biomolecules-11-01612-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/ad1c6c8a5d15/biomolecules-11-01612-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/41f8dfd3cdb9/biomolecules-11-01612-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/a67cf9a6a8c5/biomolecules-11-01612-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9509/8615770/463870208cf5/biomolecules-11-01612-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Independent Clinical Validation of the Automated Ki67 Scoring Guideline from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group.国际乳腺癌 Ki67 工作组自动 Ki67 评分指南的独立临床验证。
Biomolecules. 2021 Oct 30;11(11):1612. doi: 10.3390/biom11111612.
2
Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.利用数字图像分析评估 Ki67 重复性:一项跨平台和跨操作者研究。
Lab Invest. 2019 Jan;99(1):107-117. doi: 10.1038/s41374-018-0123-7. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.Ki67 困境:探究乳腺癌中用于自动 Ki67 评分的预后截止值和可重复性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Aug;207(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07352-4. Epub 2024 May 26.
4
Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Ki67 目测评分应用与目测评估和数字图像分析的可靠性及其在激素受体阳性乳腺癌中的预后意义。
APMIS. 2021 Aug;129(8):489-502. doi: 10.1111/apm.13156. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Evaluation of the international Ki67 working group cut point recommendations for early breast cancer: comparison with 21-gene assay results in a large integrated health care system.评估国际 Ki67 工作组推荐的早期乳腺癌界值点:与大型综合医疗保健系统中 21 基因检测结果的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan;203(2):281-289. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07118-4. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.乳腺癌中自动化 Ki67 评估的预后潜力:不同热点定义与真实全局评分的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;183(1):161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05752-w. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
7
A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌中Ki67标记指数的视觉评估与自动数字图像分析比较
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 29;11(2):e0150505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150505. eCollection 2016.
8
A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.一种通过自动化数字图像分析确保和提高乳腺癌组织中 Ki67 标记指数估计准确性的方法。
Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(2):R35. doi: 10.1186/bcr3639.
9
An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.一项国际多中心研究,旨在评估乳腺癌中 Ki67 自动评分的可重复性。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jan;32(1):59-69. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0109-4. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.基于全组织切片虚拟双重染色的乳腺癌 Ki67 增殖指数的数字图像分析:临床验证和平台间一致性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 May;169(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4669-2. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging-Based Prediction of Ki-67 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.基于影像学的肝细胞癌中Ki-67表达预测:一项回顾性研究
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(4):e70562. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70562.
2
An update on applications of digital pathology: primary diagnosis; telepathology, education and research.数字病理学应用的最新进展:初步诊断;远程病理学、教育与研究。
Diagn Pathol. 2025 Feb 12;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13000-025-01610-9.
3
Relationship between the expressions of DLL3, ASC1, TTF-1 and Ki-67: First steps of precision medicine at SCLC.

本文引用的文献

1
Highlights of the 17th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2021: customising local and systemic therapies.2021年第17届圣加仑国际乳腺癌大会亮点:定制局部和全身治疗方案
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 May 18;15:1236. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1236. eCollection 2021.
2
Variability in Breast Cancer Biomarker Assessment and the Effect on Oncological Treatment Decisions: A Nationwide 5-Year Population-Based Study.乳腺癌生物标志物评估的变异性及其对肿瘤治疗决策的影响:一项基于全国5年人口的研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 9;13(5):1166. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051166.
3
A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
DLL3、ASC1、TTF-1 和 Ki-67 的表达关系:小细胞肺癌精准医学的初探。
Oncotarget. 2024 Oct 11;15:750-763. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28660.
4
Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms.推进乳腺癌中Ki67热点检测:自动数字图像分析算法的比较分析
Histopathology. 2025 Jan;86(2):204-213. doi: 10.1111/his.15294. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Early Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Integrating Histopathology with Artificial Intelligence.早期乳腺癌风险评估:将组织病理学与人工智能相结合
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 23;16(11):1981. doi: 10.3390/cancers16111981.
6
The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.Ki67 困境:探究乳腺癌中用于自动 Ki67 评分的预后截止值和可重复性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Aug;207(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07352-4. Epub 2024 May 26.
7
Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based risk profiling in breast cancer histopathology and comparison to an established multigene assay.深度学习在乳腺癌组织病理学中的风险分析的临床评估,并与已建立的多基因检测方法进行比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;206(1):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07303-z. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
8
Use of a Novel Deep Learning Open-Source Model for Quantification of Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Patients in Pakistan: A Comparative Study between the Manual and Automated Methods.使用新型深度学习开源模型对巴基斯坦乳腺癌患者的Ki-67进行定量分析:手动方法与自动方法的比较研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;13(19):3105. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193105.
9
Identifying the optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 in breast cancer: a single-center experience.Ki-67 在乳腺癌中最佳截断点的确定:单中心经验。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Aug;51(8):3000605231195468. doi: 10.1177/03000605231195468.
10
Comparison Between Manual and Automated Assessment of Ki-67 in Breast Carcinoma: Test of a Simple Method in Daily Practice.Ki-67 在乳腺癌中手动和自动评估的比较:日常实践中简单方法的检验。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231169603. doi: 10.1177/15330338231169603.
一种用于原发性乳腺癌中 Ki67 自动评估的简单数字图像分析系统。
Histopathology. 2021 Aug;79(2):200-209. doi: 10.1111/his.14355. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
Systematic evaluation of scoring methods for Ki67 as a surrogate for 21-gene recurrence score.对Ki67作为21基因复发评分替代指标的评分方法进行系统评价。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Feb 12;7(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00221-z.
5
Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group.乳腺癌中 Ki67 的评估:国际乳腺癌 Ki67 工作组的最新建议。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jul 1;113(7):808-819. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa201.
6
Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.乳腺癌中自动化 Ki67 评估的预后潜力:不同热点定义与真实全局评分的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;183(1):161-175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05752-w. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
7
Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.Ki67 免疫组化在乳腺癌全切除标本中的标准化评分方案的分析验证:一项国际多中心合作。
Histopathology. 2019 Aug;75(2):225-235. doi: 10.1111/his.13880. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Digital quantification of KI-67 in breast cancer.乳腺癌中 KI-67 的数字化定量。
Virchows Arch. 2019 Feb;474(2):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2481-3. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
9
Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.利用数字图像分析评估 Ki67 重复性:一项跨平台和跨操作者研究。
Lab Invest. 2019 Jan;99(1):107-117. doi: 10.1038/s41374-018-0123-7. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.一项国际多中心研究,旨在评估乳腺癌中 Ki67 自动评分的可重复性。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jan;32(1):59-69. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0109-4. Epub 2018 Aug 24.