Quain Anne, Ward Michael P, Mullan Siobhan
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;11(11):3010. doi: 10.3390/ani11113010.
Advanced veterinary care (AVC) of companion animals may yield improved clinical outcomes, improved animal welfare, improved satisfaction of veterinary clients, improved satisfaction of veterinary team members, and increased practice profitability. However, it also raises ethical challenges. Yet, what counts as AVC is difficult to pinpoint due to continuing advancements. We discuss some of the challenges in defining advanced veterinary care (AVC), particularly in relation to a standard of care (SOC). We then review key ethical challenges associated with AVC that have been identified in the veterinary ethics literature, including poor quality of life, dysthanasia and caregiver burden, financial cost and accessibility of veterinary care, conflicts of interest, and the absence of ethical review for some patients undergoing AVC. We suggest some strategies to address these concerns, including prospective ethical review utilising ethical frameworks and decision-making tools, the setting of humane end points, the role of regulatory bodies in limiting acceptable procedures, and the normalisation of quality-of-life scoring. We also suggest a role for retrospective ethical review in the form of ethics rounds and clinical auditing. Our discussion reenforces the need for a spectrum of veterinary care for companion animals.
伴侣动物的高级兽医护理(AVC)可能会带来更好的临床结果、改善动物福利、提高兽医客户满意度、提升兽医团队成员满意度以及增加诊所盈利能力。然而,它也带来了伦理挑战。然而,由于不断进步,很难确切指出什么算作AVC。我们讨论了定义高级兽医护理(AVC)时的一些挑战,特别是与护理标准(SOC)相关的挑战。然后,我们回顾了兽医伦理文献中确定的与AVC相关的关键伦理挑战,包括生活质量差、安乐死和照顾者负担、兽医护理的财务成本和可及性、利益冲突以及一些接受AVC的患者缺乏伦理审查。我们提出了一些应对这些问题的策略,包括利用伦理框架和决策工具进行前瞻性伦理审查、设定人道终点、监管机构在限制可接受程序方面的作用以及生活质量评分的常态化。我们还建议以伦理查房和临床审计的形式进行回顾性伦理审查。我们的讨论强调了为伴侣动物提供一系列兽医护理的必要性。