Bohinc Klemen, Abram Anže, Zore Anamarija, Štukelj Roman, Lenarčič Ana, Vidrih Rajko, Škapin Andrijana Sever
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Zdravstvena pot 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department for Nanostructured Materials, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;14(22):6877. doi: 10.3390/ma14226877.
Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface roughness, hydrophobicity, zeta potential, tensile properties, hardness and CIE color parameters were measured. We found that foamed polymeric materials have higher roughness, higher hydrophobicity, lower Young's modulus, lower maximum tensile strength and lower hardness than solid materials. Bacterial adhesion test measurements based on observation by scanning electron microscopy show much a lower adhesion extent of on solid materials than on foamed materials. The measured biophysical properties could be the key data for users to select the optimal materials.
矫形和假肢材料应具有良好的机械性能和抗菌性能。因此,在我们的研究中,我们考虑了四种常见的泡沫闭孔材料和两种固体聚合物材料的机械性能以及细菌粘附倾向。对于所有材料,均测量了表面粗糙度、疏水性、zeta电位、拉伸性能、硬度和CIE颜色参数。我们发现,与固体材料相比,泡沫聚合物材料具有更高的粗糙度、更高的疏水性、更低的杨氏模量、更低的最大拉伸强度和更低的硬度。基于扫描电子显微镜观察的细菌粘附测试测量结果表明,固体材料上的细菌粘附程度远低于泡沫材料。所测量的生物物理性能可能是用户选择最佳材料的关键数据。