Rajwa Pawel, Huebner Nicolai A, Hostermann Dadjar I, Grossmann Nico C, Schuettfort Victor M, Korn Stephan, Quhal Fahad, König Frederik, Mostafaei Hadi, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Mori Keiichiro, Motlagh Reza Sari, Yanagisawa Takafumi, Aydh Abdulmajeed, Bryniarski Piotr, Pradere Benjamin, Paradysz Andrzej, Baltzer Pascal A, Grubmüller Bernhard, Shariat Shahrokh F
Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Pers Med. 2021 Nov 19;11(11):1231. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111231.
The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of pre-biopsy blood-based markers in patients undergoing a fusion biopsy for suspicious prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We identified 365 consecutive patients who underwent MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy for an MRI scored Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version (PI-RADS) ≥ 3. We evaluated the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR,) de Ritis ratio, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI). Uni- and multivariable logistic models were used to analyze the association of the biomarkers with biopsy findings. The clinical benefits of biomarkers implemented in clinical decision-making were assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA). In total, 69% and 58% of patients were diagnosed with any prostate cancer and Gleason Grade (GG) ≥ 2, respectively. On multivariable analysis, only high dNLR (odds ratio (OR) 2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-5.56, = 0.02) and low PNI (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.88, = 0.02) remained independent predictors for GG ≥ 2. The logistic regression models with biomarkers reached AUCs of 0.824-0.849 for GG ≥ 2. The addition of dNLR and PNI did not enhance the net benefit of a standard clinical model. Finally, we created the nomogram that may help guide biopsy avoidance in patients with suspicious MRI. In patients with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions undergoing MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy, a high dNLR and low PNI were associated with unfavorable biopsy outcomes. Pre-biopsy blood-based biomarkers did not, however, significantly improve the discriminatory power and failed to add a clinical benefit beyond standard clinical factors.
本研究的目的是评估在因前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)可疑而接受融合活检的患者中,活检前基于血液的标志物的预测价值。我们纳入了365例连续接受MRI靶向和系统性前列腺活检的患者,其MRI前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)版本评分≥3。我们评估了中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、衍生中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值(LMR)、德瑞蒂斯比值、改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)和预后营养指数(PNI)。使用单变量和多变量逻辑模型分析生物标志物与活检结果的关联。使用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估在临床决策中应用生物标志物的临床益处。总共分别有69%和58%的患者被诊断为患有任何前列腺癌和 Gleason分级(GG)≥2。在多变量分析中,只有高dNLR(比值比(OR)2.61,95%置信区间(CI)1.23 - 5.56,P = 0.02)和低PNI(OR 0.48,95%CI 0.26 - 0.88,P = 0.02)仍然是GG≥2的独立预测因素。对于GG≥2,包含生物标志物的逻辑回归模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.824 - 0.849。添加dNLR和PNI并未提高标准临床模型的净效益。最后,我们创建了列线图,可能有助于指导对MRI可疑患者避免活检。在接受MRI靶向和系统性活检的PI-RADS≥3病变患者中,高dNLR和低PNI与不良活检结果相关。然而,活检前基于血液的生物标志物并未显著提高鉴别能力,并且未能在标准临床因素之外增加临床益处。