Suppr超能文献

羟乙基淀粉(HES 130/0.4)和 5%人血白蛋白在小儿神经外科容量替代中的比较:一项回顾性单中心研究。

Comparison of hydroxyethylstarch (HES 130/0.4) and 5% human albumin for volume substitution in pediatric neurosurgery: A retrospective, single center study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2021 Nov 27;14(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05836-w.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Colloid solutions are commonly used to maintain perioperative fluid homeostasis. In regard to perioperative infant-centered care, data about the impact of colloids are rare. New data suggest a possible positive effect of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) concerning blood brain barrier. Therefore we conduct a retrospective single center study of children scheduled for neurosurgery, age < five with a blood loss > 10% of body blood volume, receiving either 6% HES 130/0.4 or 5% human albumin (HA).

RESULTS

Out of 913 patients, 86 were included (HES = 30; HA = 56). Compared to HES [16.4 ± 9.2 ml/kg body weight (mean ± SD)] HA group received more colloid volume (25.7 ± 11.3), which had more blood loss [HA 54.8 ± 45.0; HES 30.5 ± 30.0 (%) estimated blood volume] and higher fluid balances. Fibrinogen was decreased and activated partial thromboplastin time was elevated in HA group. Urinary output, creatinine and urea levels did not differ between the two groups. Serum calcium, total protein levels were lower in HES group. HA treated infants tended to have shorter ICU and hospital stays. We conclude that none of the investigated colloid solutions were without leverage to infants. Consequently randomized controlled trials about perioperative goal-directed fluid replacement of children undergoing (neuro)-surgery with major blood loss are needed.

摘要

目的

胶体溶液常用于维持围手术期液体平衡。在以婴儿为中心的围手术期护理方面,关于胶体的影响的数据很少。新数据表明羟乙基淀粉(HES)对血脑屏障可能有积极影响。因此,我们对计划接受神经外科手术、年龄<5 岁、出血量>10%的儿童进行了回顾性单中心研究,这些儿童接受 6%HES 130/0.4 或 5%人白蛋白(HA)治疗。

结果

在 913 名患者中,有 86 名患者入选(HES=30;HA=56)。与 HES[16.4±9.2 ml/kg 体重(均值±标准差)]相比,HA 组接受了更多的胶体容量(25.7±11.3),出血更多[HA 54.8±45.0;HES 30.5±30.0(%估计血容量)],液体平衡更高。HA 组纤维蛋白原减少,部分凝血活酶时间升高。两组的尿量、肌酐和尿素水平无差异。HES 组血清钙、总蛋白水平较低。HA 治疗的婴儿 ICU 和住院时间较短。我们的结论是,没有一种研究中的胶体溶液对婴儿没有优势。因此,需要进行随机对照试验,研究接受(神经)手术且有大量失血的儿童围手术期目标导向液体替代治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ba9/8627096/c6929a3b482c/13104_2021_5836_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

5
Colloids in Cardiac Surgery-Friend or Foe?心脏手术中的胶体——是友还是敌?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Oct;31(5):1639-1648. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
7
[Volume replacement solutions--pharmacology and clinical use].[容量替代溶液——药理学与临床应用]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1998 Jan;33(1):2-17. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994204.

本文引用的文献

3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验